These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26723131)

  • 1. Short communication: The effect of genotyping cows to improve the reliability of genomic predictions for selection candidates.
    Edel C; Pimentel ECG; Plieschke L; Emmerling R; Götz KU
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Mar; 99(3):1999-2004. PubMed ID: 26723131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimization of a genomic breeding program for a moderately sized dairy cattle population.
    Reiner-Benaim A; Ezra E; Weller JI
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Apr; 100(4):2892-2904. PubMed ID: 28189326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genotyping strategies for genomic selection in small dairy cattle populations.
    Jiménez-Montero JA; González-Recio O; Alenda R
    Animal; 2012 Aug; 6(8):1216-24. PubMed ID: 23217224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genomic selection strategies in a small dairy cattle population evaluated for genetic gain and profit.
    Thomasen JR; Egger-Danner C; Willam A; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; Sørensen AC
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(1):458-70. PubMed ID: 24239076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genotyping more cows increases genetic gain and reduces rate of true inbreeding in a dairy cattle breeding scheme using female reproductive technologies.
    Thomasen JR; Liu H; Sørensen AC
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jan; 103(1):597-606. PubMed ID: 31733861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Including different groups of genotyped females for genomic prediction in a Nordic Jersey population.
    Gao H; Madsen P; Nielsen US; Aamand GP; Su G; Byskov K; Jensen J
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Dec; 98(12):9051-9. PubMed ID: 26433419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of enlarging the reference population with (un)genotyped animals on the accuracy of genomic selection in dairy cattle.
    Pszczola M; Mulder HA; Calus MP
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jan; 94(1):431-41. PubMed ID: 21183054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficiency of multi-breed genomic selection for dairy cattle breeds with different sizes of reference population.
    Hozé C; Fritz S; Phocas F; Boichard D; Ducrocq V; Croiseau P
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3918-29. PubMed ID: 24704232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genomic evaluation of Brown Swiss dairy cattle with limited national genotype data and integrated external information.
    Luštrek B; Vandenplas J; Gorjanc G; Potočnik K
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 May; 104(5):5738-5754. PubMed ID: 33685705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Systematic genotyping of groups of cows to improve genomic estimated breeding values of selection candidates.
    Plieschke L; Edel C; Pimentel EC; Emmerling R; Bennewitz J; Götz KU
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Sep; 48(1):73. PubMed ID: 27677439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genomic predictions based on animal models using genotype imputation on a national scale in Norwegian Red cattle.
    Meuwissen TH; Svendsen M; Solberg T; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Oct; 47():79. PubMed ID: 26464226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adding cows to the reference population makes a small dairy population competitive.
    Thomasen JR; Sørensen AC; Lund MS; Guldbrandtsen B
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Sep; 97(9):5822-32. PubMed ID: 24996280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Short communication: Genotyping of cows to speed up availability of genomic estimated breeding values for direct health traits in Austrian Fleckvieh (Simmental) cattle--genetic and economic aspects.
    Egger-Danner C; Schwarzenbacher H; Willam A
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Jul; 97(7):4552-6. PubMed ID: 24835973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs.
    König S; Swalve HH
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5292-303. PubMed ID: 19762847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of selective genotyping on the response to selection using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction.
    Howard JT; Rathje TA; Bruns CE; Wilson-Wells DF; Kachman SD; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Nov; 96(11):4532-4542. PubMed ID: 30107560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of genotyped cows in the reference population on the genomic evaluation of Holstein cattle.
    Uemoto Y; Osawa T; Saburi J
    Animal; 2017 Mar; 11(3):382-393. PubMed ID: 27515004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genomic selection in a pig population including information from slaughtered full sibs of boars within a sib-testing program.
    Samorè AB; Buttazzoni L; Gallo M; Russo V; Fontanesi L
    Animal; 2015 May; 9(5):750-9. PubMed ID: 25510405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genomic selection for tolerance to heat stress in Australian dairy cattle.
    Nguyen TTT; Bowman PJ; Haile-Mariam M; Pryce JE; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Apr; 99(4):2849-2862. PubMed ID: 27037467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Single-step genomic model improved reliability and reduced the bias of genomic predictions in Danish Jersey.
    Ma P; Lund MS; Nielsen US; Aamand GP; Su G
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Dec; 98(12):9026-34. PubMed ID: 26433415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability of genomic evaluations in Holstein-Friesians using haplotypes based on the BovineHD BeadChip.
    Schopen GC; Schrooten C
    J Dairy Sci; 2013; 96(12):7945-51. PubMed ID: 24140319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.