These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Serati M; Bogani G; Sorice P; Braga A; Torella M; Salvatore S; Uccella S; Cromi A; Ghezzi F Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):303-18. PubMed ID: 24631406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surgical Outcomes of Paravaginal Repair After Robotic Sacrocolpopexy. Hoke TP; Goldstein H; Saks EK; Vakili B J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):892-895. PubMed ID: 29371174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing the outcomes and effectiveness of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Chang CL; Chen CH; Chang SJ Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Feb; 33(2):297-308. PubMed ID: 33760992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: efficiency of robotic assistance compared to standard laparoscopy. Evangelopoulos N; Nessi A; Achtari C J Robot Surg; 2024 Feb; 18(1):72. PubMed ID: 38340232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robot-assisted surgery for the management of apical prolapse: a bi-centre prospective cohort study. van Zanten F; Schraffordt Koops SE; O'Sullivan OE; Lenters E; Broeders I; O'Reilly BA BJOG; 2019 Jul; 126(8):1065-1073. PubMed ID: 30924606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique and outcomes at a single high-volume institution. Ploumidis A; Spinoit AF; De Naeyer G; Schatteman P; Gan M; Ficarra V; Volpe A; Mottrie A Eur Urol; 2014 Jan; 65(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 23806518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. White WM; Pickens RB; Elder RF; Firoozi F Urol Clin North Am; 2014 Nov; 41(4):549-57. PubMed ID: 25306166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes. Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical techniques for advanced stage pelvic organ prolapse. Brown DN; Strauchon C; Gonzalez H; Gruber D Minerva Ginecol; 2016 Feb; 68(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 26448444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic sacrocolpopexy. A review. St Louis S; Salamon C Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Jun; 67(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 25697975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Robot-assisted pelvic floor reconstruction: review and own experience]. Sukhikh SO; Kolontarev KB; Vasilyev AO; Pushkar DY Urologiia; 2018 Dec; (6):139-143. PubMed ID: 30742393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surgical techniques for pelvic floor reconstruction: review of the recent literature. Abraham N; Goldman HB Minerva Ginecol; 2013 Feb; 65(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 23412018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cosmetic Appearance of Port-site Scars 1 Year After Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: A Supplementary Study of the ACCESS Clinical Trial. Mueller ER; Kenton K; Anger JT; Bresee C; Tarnay C J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):917-21. PubMed ID: 27180224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perioperative, postoperative and anatomical outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy. Kilic GS; Lee T; Lewis K; Demirkiran C; Dursun F; Unlu BS J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 May; 41(4):651-654. PubMed ID: 33045854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]