These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26723179)

  • 1. Robotic Female Pelvic Floor Reconstruction: A Review.
    Clifton MM; Pizarro-Berdichevsky J; Goldman HB
    Urology; 2016 May; 91():33-40. PubMed ID: 26723179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Role of robotic surgery on pelvic floor reconstruction.
    Giannini A; Russo E; Malacarne E; Cecchi E; Mannella P; Simoncini T
    Minerva Ginecol; 2019 Feb; 71(1):4-17. PubMed ID: 30318878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pelvic floor surgery: Review.
    Daykan Y; Rotem R; O'Reilly BA
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2023 Dec; 91():102418. PubMed ID: 37776580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
    Sajadi KP; Goldman HB
    Nat Rev Urol; 2015 Apr; 12(4):216-24. PubMed ID: 25800401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.
    Serati M; Bogani G; Sorice P; Braga A; Torella M; Salvatore S; Uccella S; Cromi A; Ghezzi F
    Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):303-18. PubMed ID: 24631406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surgical Outcomes of Paravaginal Repair After Robotic Sacrocolpopexy.
    Hoke TP; Goldstein H; Saks EK; Vakili B
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):892-895. PubMed ID: 29371174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing the outcomes and effectiveness of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
    Chang CL; Chen CH; Chang SJ
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Feb; 33(2):297-308. PubMed ID: 33760992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic vs abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 44-month pelvic floor outcomes.
    Geller EJ; Parnell BA; Dunivan GC
    Urology; 2012 Mar; 79(3):532-6. PubMed ID: 22386392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotic approaches to prolapse surgery.
    Rosenblum N
    Curr Opin Urol; 2012 Jul; 22(4):292-6. PubMed ID: 22647648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: efficiency of robotic assistance compared to standard laparoscopy.
    Evangelopoulos N; Nessi A; Achtari C
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Feb; 18(1):72. PubMed ID: 38340232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robot-assisted surgery for the management of apical prolapse: a bi-centre prospective cohort study.
    van Zanten F; Schraffordt Koops SE; O'Sullivan OE; Lenters E; Broeders I; O'Reilly BA
    BJOG; 2019 Jul; 126(8):1065-1073. PubMed ID: 30924606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique and outcomes at a single high-volume institution.
    Ploumidis A; Spinoit AF; De Naeyer G; Schatteman P; Gan M; Ficarra V; Volpe A; Mottrie A
    Eur Urol; 2014 Jan; 65(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 23806518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
    White WM; Pickens RB; Elder RF; Firoozi F
    Urol Clin North Am; 2014 Nov; 41(4):549-57. PubMed ID: 25306166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes.
    Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surgical techniques for advanced stage pelvic organ prolapse.
    Brown DN; Strauchon C; Gonzalez H; Gruber D
    Minerva Ginecol; 2016 Feb; 68(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 26448444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotic sacrocolpopexy. A review.
    St Louis S; Salamon C
    Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Jun; 67(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 25697975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Robot-assisted pelvic floor reconstruction: review and own experience].
    Sukhikh SO; Kolontarev KB; Vasilyev AO; Pushkar DY
    Urologiia; 2018 Dec; (6):139-143. PubMed ID: 30742393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surgical techniques for pelvic floor reconstruction: review of the recent literature.
    Abraham N; Goldman HB
    Minerva Ginecol; 2013 Feb; 65(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 23412018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cosmetic Appearance of Port-site Scars 1 Year After Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: A Supplementary Study of the ACCESS Clinical Trial.
    Mueller ER; Kenton K; Anger JT; Bresee C; Tarnay C
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):917-21. PubMed ID: 27180224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perioperative, postoperative and anatomical outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    Kilic GS; Lee T; Lewis K; Demirkiran C; Dursun F; Unlu BS
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 May; 41(4):651-654. PubMed ID: 33045854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.