These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26723308)

  • 41. Risks of Ear Complaints of Passengers and Drivers While Trains Are Passing Through Tunnels at High Speed: A Numerical Simulation and Experimental Study.
    Xie P; Peng Y; Wang T; Zhang H
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Apr; 16(7):. PubMed ID: 30974822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effects of stimulus frequency on vocal suppression in neonates.
    Watterson T; Riccillo S
    J Aud Res; 1985 Apr; 25(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 3842140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Distortion product emissions in humans. I. Basic properties in normally hearing subjects.
    Lonsbury-Martin BL; Harris FP; Stagner BB; Hawkins MD; Martin GK
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1990 May; 147():3-14. PubMed ID: 2110797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The assessment and evaluation of low-frequency noise near the region of infrasound.
    Ziaran S
    Noise Health; 2014; 16(68):10-7. PubMed ID: 24583675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Total annoyance from an industrial noise source with a main spectral component combined with a background noise.
    Alayrac M; Marquis-Favre C; Viollon S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):189-99. PubMed ID: 21786889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Infants born very preterm react to variations of the acoustic environment in their incubator from a minimum signal-to-noise ratio threshold of 5 to 10 dBA.
    Kuhn P; Zores C; Pebayle T; Hoeft A; Langlet C; Escande B; Astruc D; Dufour A
    Pediatr Res; 2012 Apr; 71(4 Pt 1):386-92. PubMed ID: 22391640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Development of a Linear Acoustic Array for Aero-Acoustic Quantification of Camber-Bladed Vertical Axis Wind Turbine.
    Butt AH; Akbar B; Aslam J; Akram N; Soudagar MEM; García Márquez FP; Younis MY; Uddin E
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Oct; 20(20):. PubMed ID: 33096774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The influence of jet engine noise on hearing of technical staff.
    Konopka W; Pawlaczyk-Luszczyńska M; Śliwińska-Kowalska M
    Med Pr; 2014; 65(5):583-92. PubMed ID: 25812386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Elderly men and women are less responsive to startling noises: N1, P3 and blink evidence.
    Ford JM; Roth WT; Isaacks BG; White PM; Hood SH; Pfefferbaum A
    Biol Psychol; 1995 Feb; 39(2-3):57-80. PubMed ID: 7734630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Acoustic stapedius reflex function in man revisited.
    Aiken SJ; Andrus JN; Bance M; Phillips DP
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):e38-51. PubMed ID: 23403808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Measured wavenumber: frequency spectrum associated with acoustic and aerodynamic wall pressure fluctuations.
    Arguillat B; Ricot D; Bailly C; Robert G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1647-55. PubMed ID: 20968337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Test-retest repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Wagner W; Heppelmann G; Vonthein R; Zenner HP
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):378-91. PubMed ID: 18382378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Evoked response of heart rate variability using short-duration white noise.
    Lee GS; Chen ML; Wang GY
    Auton Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 155(1-2):94-7. PubMed ID: 20071247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The Importance of Reverberation for the Design of Neonatal Incubators.
    Puyana-Romero V; Núñez-Solano D; Fernández-Zacarías F; Jara-Muñoz E; Hernández-Molina R
    Front Pediatr; 2021; 9():584736. PubMed ID: 33898352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Loudness and the acoustic reflex: normal-hearing listeners.
    Keith RW
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1979; 4(4):152-6. PubMed ID: 422427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A less stressful animal model: a conditioned avoidance behaviour task for guineapigs.
    Agterberg MJ; van den Broek M; Philippens IH
    Lab Anim; 2010 Jul; 44(3):206-10. PubMed ID: 20071411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effect of low-frequency random noises on performance of a numeric monitoring task.
    Benignus VA; Otto DA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Feb; 40(1):231-9. PubMed ID: 235116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Echo planar imaging at 4 Tesla with minimum acoustic noise.
    Tomasi DG; Ernst T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18(1):128-30. PubMed ID: 12815648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A study on the contribution of body vibrations to the vibratory sensation induced by high-level, complex low-frequency noise.
    Takahashi Y
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(50):2-8. PubMed ID: 21173481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.