371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26723318)
1. Psychometric functions for sentence recognition in sinusoidally amplitude-modulated noises.
Shen Y; Manzano NK; Richards VM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3613-24. PubMed ID: 26723318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of fluctuating maskers for speech recognition tests.
Francart T; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 21091261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: effect of masker type.
Deroche ML; Culling JF
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL465-70. PubMed ID: 24181992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Binaural speech intelligibility in rooms with variations in spatial location of sources and modulation depth of noise interferers.
Collin B; Lavandier M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1146-59. PubMed ID: 23927114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On the near non-existence of "pure" energetic masking release for speech.
Stone MA; Moore BC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Apr; 135(4):1967-77. PubMed ID: 25234995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of nearby maskers on speech intelligibility in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
Westermann A; Buchholz JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):2214. PubMed ID: 28372143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recognition of synthesized vowel sequences in steady-state and sinusoidally amplitude-modulated noises.
Shen Y; Pearson DV
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1835. PubMed ID: 28372131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of working memory capacity and semantic cues on the intelligibility of speech in noise.
Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Rönnberg J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2225-34. PubMed ID: 23967952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of noise type on speech reception thresholds across four languages measured with matrix sentence tests.
Hochmuth S; Kollmeier B; Brand T; Jürgens T
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():62-70. PubMed ID: 26097982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does it take older adults longer than younger adults to perceptually segregate a speech target from a background masker?
Ben-David BM; Tse VY; Schneider BA
Hear Res; 2012 Aug; 290(1-2):55-63. PubMed ID: 22609772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modulation masking release using the Brazilian-Portuguese HINT: psychometric functions and the effect of speech time compression.
Grose JH; Griz S; Pacífico FA; Advíncula KP; Menezes DC
Int J Audiol; 2015 Apr; 54(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 25630394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of masker modulation depth on speech masking release.
Gnansia D; Jourdes V; Lorenzi C
Hear Res; 2008 May; 239(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 18434049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of periodicity in perceiving speech in quiet and in background noise.
Steinmetzger K; Rosen S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3586-99. PubMed ID: 26723315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The intelligibility of speech in a harmonic masker varying in fundamental frequency contour, broadband temporal envelope, and spatial location.
Leclère T; Lavandier M; Deroche MLD
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():1-10. PubMed ID: 28390253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
Summers V; Molis MR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech recognition in one- and two-talker maskers in school-age children and adults: Development of perceptual masking and glimpsing.
Buss E; Leibold LJ; Porter HL; Grose JH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2650. PubMed ID: 28464682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spatial release from masking based on binaural processing for up to six maskers.
Yost WA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):2093. PubMed ID: 28372135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
