These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26723340)

  • 41. Design and preliminary testing of a visually guided hearing aid.
    Kidd G; Favrot S; Desloge JG; Streeter TM; Mason CR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):EL202-7. PubMed ID: 23464129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Sentence perception in listening conditions having similar speech intelligibility indices.
    Gustafson SJ; Pittman AL
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 21047291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Influence of "omnidirectional" loudspeaker directivity on measured room impulse responses.
    Knüttel T; Witew IB; Vorländer M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):3654-62. PubMed ID: 24180776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Room geometry inference based on spherical microphone array eigenbeam processing.
    Mabande E; Kowalczyk K; Sun H; Kellermann W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2773-89. PubMed ID: 24116416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Energy- and wave-based beam-tracing prediction of room-acoustical parameters using different boundary conditions.
    Yousefzadeh B; Hodgson M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1450-61. PubMed ID: 22978874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Microscopic prediction of speech intelligibility in spatially distributed speech-shaped noise for normal-hearing listeners.
    Geravanchizadeh M; Fallah A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):4004-15. PubMed ID: 26723354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Information-bearing acoustic change outperforms duration in predicting intelligibility of full-spectrum and noise-vocoded sentences.
    Stilp CE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1518-29. PubMed ID: 24606287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The effect of noise envelope modulation on quality judgments of noisy speech.
    Jin IK; Kates JM; Arehart KH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):EL277-83. PubMed ID: 23039565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The potential of onset enhancement for increased speech intelligibility in auditory prostheses.
    Koning R; Wouters J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2569-81. PubMed ID: 23039450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Speech enhancement using a generic noise codebook.
    Srinivasan S; Rao Naidu DH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL161-7. PubMed ID: 22894316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Self-masking and overlap-masking from reverberation using the speech-evoked auditory brainstem response.
    Al Osman R; Dajani HR; Giguère C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Dec; 142(6):EL555. PubMed ID: 29289064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Speech intelligibility in rooms: Effect of prior listening exposure interacts with room acoustics.
    Zahorik P; Brandewie EJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):74. PubMed ID: 27475133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Modeling the effects of a single reflection on binaural speech intelligibility.
    Rennies J; Warzybok A; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1556-67. PubMed ID: 24606290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effect of the division between early and late reflections on intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech.
    Li J; Xia R; Fang Q; Li A; Pan J; Yan Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May; 137(5):2801-10. PubMed ID: 25994708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The effect of spatial separation in distance on the intelligibility of speech in rooms.
    Westermann A; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):757-67. PubMed ID: 25698010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. On the importance of early reflections for speech in rooms.
    Bradley JS; Sato H; Picard M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jun; 113(6):3233-44. PubMed ID: 12822796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Revision, extension, and evaluation of a binaural speech intelligibility model.
    Beutelmann R; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2479-97. PubMed ID: 20370031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Modifying the normalized covariance metric measure to account for nonlinear distortions introduced by noise-reduction algorithms.
    Chen F; Hu Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL405-11. PubMed ID: 23656101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Perceptual effects of noise reduction by time-frequency masking of noisy speech.
    Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2690-9. PubMed ID: 23039461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Recognition memory in noise for speech of varying intelligibility.
    Gilbert RC; Chandrasekaran B; Smiljanic R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):389-99. PubMed ID: 24437779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.