152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26723353)
1. Interpreting attenuation at different excitation amplitudes to estimate strain-dependent interfacial rheological properties of lipid-coated monodisperse microbubbles.
Xia L; Porter TM; Sarkar K
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3994-4003. PubMed ID: 26723353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modeling of nonlinear viscous stress in encapsulating shells of lipid-coated contrast agent microbubbles.
Doinikov AA; Haac JF; Dayton PA
Ultrasonics; 2009 Feb; 49(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 18990417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determination of the interfacial rheological properties of a poly(DL-lactic acid)-encapsulated contrast agent using in vitro attenuation and scattering.
Paul S; Russakow D; Rodgers T; Sarkar K; Cochran M; Wheatley MA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Jul; 39(7):1277-91. PubMed ID: 23643050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modeling complicated rheological behaviors in encapsulating shells of lipid-coated microbubbles accounting for nonlinear changes of both shell viscosity and elasticity.
Li Q; Matula TJ; Tu J; Guo X; Zhang D
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Feb; 58(4):985-98. PubMed ID: 23339902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interfacial Rheological Properties of Contrast Microbubble Targestar P as a Function of Ambient Pressure.
Kumar KN; Sarkar K
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Apr; 42(4):1010-7. PubMed ID: 26777069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterization of ultrasound contrast microbubbles using in vitro experiments and viscous and viscoelastic interface models for encapsulation.
Sarkar K; Shi WT; Chatterjee D; Forsberg F
J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Jul; 118(1):539-50. PubMed ID: 16119373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investigation on the inertial cavitation threshold and shell properties of commercialized ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.
Guo X; Li Q; Zhang Z; Zhang D; Tu J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1622-31. PubMed ID: 23927202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Excitation threshold for subharmonic generation from contrast microbubbles.
Katiyar A; Sarkar K
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3137-47. PubMed ID: 22087942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A model for acoustic vaporization of encapsulated droplets.
Guédra M; Coulouvrat F
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3656-67. PubMed ID: 26723321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic manipulation of the subharmonic scattering of phospholipid-coated microbubbles.
Faez T; Renaud G; Defontaine M; Calle S; de Jong N
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(19):6459-73. PubMed ID: 21934190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of encapsulation damping on the excitation threshold for subharmonic generation from contrast microbubbles.
Katiyar A; Sarkar K
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3576-85. PubMed ID: 23145637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acoustic characterization of monodisperse lipid-coated microbubbles: relationship between size and shell viscoelastic properties.
Parrales MA; Fernandez JM; Perez-Saborid M; Kopechek JA; Porter TM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1077. PubMed ID: 25190383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accounting for the stability of microbubbles to multi-pulse excitation using a lipid-shedding model.
O'Brien JP; Ovenden N; Stride E
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):EL180-5. PubMed ID: 21974489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High-precision acoustic measurements of the nonlinear dilatational elasticity of phospholipid coated monodisperse microbubbles.
Segers T; Gaud E; Versluis M; Frinking P
Soft Matter; 2018 Dec; 14(47):9550-9561. PubMed ID: 30357244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Material characterization of the encapsulation of an ultrasound contrast microbubble and its subharmonic response: strain-softening interfacial elasticity model.
Paul S; Katiyar A; Sarkar K; Chatterjee D; Shi WT; Forsberg F
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jun; 127(6):3846-57. PubMed ID: 20550283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Resonance frequencies of lipid-shelled microbubbles in the regime of nonlinear oscillations.
Doinikov AA; Haac JF; Dayton PA
Ultrasonics; 2009 Feb; 49(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 18977009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nonlinear radial oscillations of encapsulated microbubbles subject to ultrasound: the effect of membrane constitutive law.
Tsiglifis K; Pelekasis NA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4059-70. PubMed ID: 18537358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chirp resonance spectroscopy of single lipid-coated microbubbles using an "acoustical camera".
Renaud G; Bosch JG; van der Steen AF; de Jong N
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):EL470-5. PubMed ID: 23231210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pressure-dependent attenuation and scattering of phospholipid-coated microbubbles at low acoustic pressures.
Emmer M; Vos HJ; Goertz DE; van Wamel A; Versluis M; de Jong N
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Jan; 35(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 18829153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Single Microbubble Measurements of Lipid Monolayer Viscoelastic Properties for Small-Amplitude Oscillations.
Lum JS; Dove JD; Murray TW; Borden MA
Langmuir; 2016 Sep; 32(37):9410-7. PubMed ID: 27552442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
