These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26724460)

  • 41. Impact of Dietary Protein and Gender on Food Reinforcement.
    Casperson SL; Roemmich JN
    Nutrients; 2017 Aug; 9(9):. PubMed ID: 28867766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Impulsivity is associated with food intake, snacking, and eating disorders in a general population.
    Bénard M; Bellisle F; Kesse-Guyot E; Julia C; Andreeva VA; Etilé F; Reach G; Dechelotte P; Tavolacci MP; Hercberg S; Péneau S
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2019 Jan; 109(1):117-126. PubMed ID: 30596882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Lunch-time food choices in preschoolers: Relationships between absolute and relative intakes of different food categories, and appetitive characteristics and weight.
    Carnell S; Pryor K; Mais LA; Warkentin S; Benson L; Cheng R
    Physiol Behav; 2016 Aug; 162():151-60. PubMed ID: 27039281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Relationships between perfectionism, self-report impulsivity measures and delay discounting.
    Wainwright K; Romanowich P; Bibriescas N
    Int J Psychol; 2020 Dec; 55(6):951-958. PubMed ID: 32232870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Focus on the future: Episodic future thinking reduces discount rate and snacking.
    Dassen FCM; Jansen A; Nederkoorn C; Houben K
    Appetite; 2016 Jan; 96():327-332. PubMed ID: 26431684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Cued to Act on Impulse: More Impulsive Choice and Risky Decision Making by Women Susceptible to Overeating after Exposure to Food Stimuli.
    Yeomans MR; Brace A
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0137626. PubMed ID: 26378459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Impulsivity (delay discounting) for food and cocaine in male and female rats selectively bred for high and low saccharin intake.
    Perry JL; Nelson SE; Anderson MM; Morgan AD; Carroll ME
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2007 Apr; 86(4):822-37. PubMed ID: 17498785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Inhibitory control effects in adolescent binge eating and consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and snacks.
    Ames SL; Kisbu-Sakarya Y; Reynolds KD; Boyle S; Cappelli C; Cox MG; Dust M; Grenard JL; Mackinnon DP; Stacy AW
    Appetite; 2014 Oct; 81():180-92. PubMed ID: 24949566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The power of social influence over food intake: examining the effects of attentional bias and impulsivity.
    Hermans RC; Larsen JK; Lochbuehler K; Nederkoorn C; Herman CP; Engels RC
    Br J Nutr; 2013 Feb; 109(3):572-80. PubMed ID: 22571730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effects of daily snack food intake on food reinforcement depend on body mass index and energy density.
    Clark EN; Dewey AM; Temple JL
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2010 Feb; 91(2):300-8. PubMed ID: 20016012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Ecological momentary assessment of obesogenic eating behavior: combining person-specific and environmental predictors.
    Thomas JG; Doshi S; Crosby RD; Lowe MR
    Obesity (Silver Spring); 2011 Aug; 19(8):1574-9. PubMed ID: 21273995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The effect of mindful eating on subsequent intake of a high calorie snack.
    Seguias L; Tapper K
    Appetite; 2018 Feb; 121():93-100. PubMed ID: 29104106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A questionnaire approach to measuring the relative reinforcing efficacy of snack foods.
    Epstein LH; Dearing KK; Roba LG
    Eat Behav; 2010 Apr; 11(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 20188288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Stopping at the sight of food - How gender and obesity impact on response inhibition.
    Mühlberg C; Mathar D; Villringer A; Horstmann A; Neumann J
    Appetite; 2016 Dec; 107():663-676. PubMed ID: 27592420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Behavioral measures of risk tasking, sensation seeking and sensitivity to reward may reflect different motivations for spicy food liking and consumption.
    Byrnes NK; Hayes JE
    Appetite; 2016 Aug; 103():411-422. PubMed ID: 27137410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Delay discounting moderates the effect of food reinforcement on energy intake among non-obese women.
    Rollins BY; Dearing KK; Epstein LH
    Appetite; 2010 Dec; 55(3):420-5. PubMed ID: 20678532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Mindful decision making and inhibitory control training as complementary means to decrease snack consumption.
    Forman EM; Shaw JA; Goldstein SP; Butryn ML; Martin LM; Meiran N; Crosby RD; Manasse SM
    Appetite; 2016 Aug; 103():176-183. PubMed ID: 27083129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The relative-reinforcing value of food under differing levels of food deprivation and restriction.
    Raynor HA; Epstein LH
    Appetite; 2003 Feb; 40(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 12631501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Impulsive choice does not predict binge-like eating in rats.
    Moore CF; Blasio A; Sabino V; Cottone P
    Behav Pharmacol; 2018 Dec; 29(8):726-731. PubMed ID: 30325787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The latent structure of impulsivity: impulsive choice, impulsive action, and impulsive personality traits.
    MacKillop J; Weafer J; C Gray J; Oshri A; Palmer A; de Wit H
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2016 Sep; 233(18):3361-70. PubMed ID: 27449350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.