BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26724647)

  • 1. Approaches to ultra-low radiation dose coronary artery calcium scoring based on 3rd generation dual-source CT: A phantom study.
    McQuiston AD; Muscogiuri G; Schoepf UJ; Meinel FG; Canstein C; Varga-Szemes A; Cannao' PM; Wichmann JL; Allmendinger T; Vliegenthart R; De Cecco CN
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 26724647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Iterative beam-hardening correction with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction in low voltage CT coronary calcium scoring with tin filtration: Impact on coronary artery calcium quantification and image quality.
    Tesche C; De Cecco CN; Schoepf UJ; Duguay TM; Albrecht MH; Caruso D; Varga-Szemes A; Lesslie VW; Ebersberger U; Canstein C; Thilo C; Hoffmann E; Allmendinger T; Nance JW
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(5):354-359. PubMed ID: 28756086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Very low-dose coronary artery calcium scanning with high-pitch spiral acquisition mode: comparison between 120-kV and 100-kV tube voltage protocols.
    Marwan M; Mettin C; Pflederer T; Seltmann M; Schuhbäck A; Muschiol G; Ropers D; Daniel WG; Achenbach S
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2013; 7(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 23333186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determining the radiation dose reduction potential for coronary calcium scanning with computed tomography: an anthropomorphic phantom study comparing filtered backprojection and the adaptive iterative dose reduction algorithm for image reconstruction.
    Blobel J; Mews J; Schuijf JD; Overlaet W
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Dec; 48(12):857-62. PubMed ID: 23917328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of CT radiation dose reduction and iterative reconstruction algorithms from four different vendors on coronary calcium scoring.
    Willemink MJ; Takx RA; de Jong PA; Budde RP; Bleys RL; Das M; Wildberger JE; Prokop M; Buls N; de Mey J; Schilham AM; Leiner T
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Sep; 24(9):2201-12. PubMed ID: 24889996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch coronary angiography with third-generation dual-source CT at 70 kVp tube voltage: feasibility, image quality, radiation dose, and effect of iterative reconstruction.
    Hell MM; Bittner D; Schuhbaeck A; Muschiol G; Brand M; Lell M; Uder M; Achenbach S; Marwan M
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2014; 8(6):418-25. PubMed ID: 25439789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective evaluation of the influence of iterative reconstruction on the reproducibility of coronary calcium quantification in reduced radiation dose 320 detector row CT.
    Choi AD; Leifer ES; Yu J; Shanbhag SM; Bronson K; Arai AE; Chen MY
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 27591767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High-pitch low-voltage CT coronary artery calcium scoring with tin filtration: accuracy and radiation dose reduction.
    Apfaltrer G; Albrecht MH; Schoepf UJ; Duguay TM; De Cecco CN; Nance JW; De Santis D; Apfaltrer P; Eid MH; Eason CD; Thompson ZM; Bauer MJ; Varga-Szemes A; Jacobs BE; Sorantin E; Tesche C
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Jul; 28(7):3097-3104. PubMed ID: 29404770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiation dose reduction at coronary artery calcium scoring by using a low tube current technique and hybrid iterative reconstruction.
    Matsuura N; Urashima M; Fukumoto W; Sunamori H; Tatsugami F; Toyota N; Awai K
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 25319604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Finding the optimal dose reduction and iterative reconstruction level for coronary calcium scoring.
    Willemink MJ; den Harder AM; Foppen W; Schilham AM; Rienks R; Laufer EM; Nieman K; de Jong PA; Budde RP; Nathoe HM; Leiner T
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 26342405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CT coronary calcium scoring with tin filtration using iterative beam-hardening calcium correction reconstruction.
    Tesche C; De Cecco CN; Schoepf UJ; Duguay TM; Albrecht MH; De Santis D; Varga-Szemes A; Lesslie VW; Ebersberger U; Bayer RR; Canstein C; Hoffmann E; Allmendinger T; Nance JW
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Jun; 91():29-34. PubMed ID: 28629567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Submillisievert coronary calcium quantification using model-based iterative reconstruction: A within-patient analysis.
    den Harder AM; Wolterink JM; Willemink MJ; Schilham AMR; de Jong PA; Budde RPJ; Nathoe HM; Išgum I; Leiner T
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 85(11):2152-2159. PubMed ID: 27776671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction on Agatston Coronary Artery Calcium Scores in Comparison to Filtered Back Projection in Native Cardiac CT.
    Obmann VC; Klink T; Heverhagen JT; Stork A; Laqmani A; Adam G; Begemann PG
    Rofo; 2015 May; 187(5):372-9. PubMed ID: 25962672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Low-dose dual-source CT angiography with iterative reconstruction for coronary artery stent evaluation.
    Eisentopf J; Achenbach S; Ulzheimer S; Layritz C; Wuest W; May M; Lell M; Ropers D; Klinghammer L; Daniel WG; Pflederer T
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Apr; 6(4):458-65. PubMed ID: 23498678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D Integrated with Automatic Tube Current Modulation for CT Coronary Artery Calcium Quantification: Comparison to Traditional Filtered Back Projection in an Anthropomorphic Phantom and Patients.
    Tang YC; Liu YC; Hsu MY; Tsai HY; Chen CM
    Acad Radiol; 2018 Aug; 25(8):1010-1017. PubMed ID: 29395796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Iterative reconstruction to preserve image quality and diagnostic accuracy at reduced radiation dose in coronary CT angiography: an intraindividual comparison.
    Yin WH; Lu B; Li N; Han L; Hou ZH; Wu RZ; Wu YJ; Niu HX; Jiang SL; Krazinski AW; Ebersberger U; Meinel FG; Schoepf UJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Dec; 6(12):1239-49. PubMed ID: 24269265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Controversies about effects of low-kilovoltage MDCT acquisition on Agatston calcium scoring.
    Deprez FC; Vlassenbroek A; Ghaye B; Raaijmakers R; Coche E
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2013; 7(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 23333185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Low-concentration contrast medium for 128-slice dual-source CT coronary angiography at a very low radiation dose using prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition.
    Zheng M; Wu Y; Wei M; Liu Y; Zhao H; Li J
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 25457735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Value of knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction in low-kV 256-slice coronary CT angiography.
    Yuki H; Utsunomiya D; Funama Y; Tokuyasu S; Namimoto T; Hirai T; Itatani R; Katahira K; Oshima S; Yamashita Y
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2014; 8(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 24661824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques in quantifying coronary calcium.
    Takahashi M; Kimura F; Umezawa T; Watanabe Y; Ogawa H
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 26276567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.