BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

665 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26724840)

  • 1. Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer Screening: A Pilot Study Within the Göteborg Randomised Screening Trial.
    Grenabo Bergdahl A; Wilderäng U; Aus G; Carlsson S; Damber JE; Frånlund M; Geterud K; Khatami A; Socratous A; Stranne J; Hellström M; Hugosson J
    Eur Urol; 2016 Oct; 70(4):566-573. PubMed ID: 26724840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The GÖTEBORG prostate cancer screening 2 trial: a prospective, randomised, population-based prostate cancer screening trial with prostate-specific antigen testing followed by magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate.
    Kohestani K; Månsson M; Arnsrud Godtman R; Stranne J; Wallström J; Carlsson S; Hellström M; Hugosson J
    Scand J Urol; 2021 Apr; 55(2):116-124. PubMed ID: 33612068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prostate cancer screening using a combination of risk-prediction, MRI, and targeted prostate biopsies (STHLM3-MRI): a prospective, population-based, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.
    Nordström T; Discacciati A; Bergman M; Clements M; Aly M; Annerstedt M; Glaessgen A; Carlsson S; Jäderling F; Eklund M; Grönberg H;
    Lancet Oncol; 2021 Sep; 22(9):1240-1249. PubMed ID: 34391509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomarker vs MRI-Enhanced Strategies for Prostate Cancer Screening: The STHLM3-MRI Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Björnebo L; Discacciati A; Falagario U; Vigneswaran HT; Jäderling F; Grönberg H; Eklund M; Nordström T; Lantz A
    JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Apr; 7(4):e247131. PubMed ID: 38648061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationship Between Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Biopsy Indication, and MRI-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy Outcomes.
    Meng X; Rosenkrantz AB; Mendhiratta N; Fenstermaker M; Huang R; Wysock JS; Bjurlin MA; Marshall S; Deng FM; Zhou M; Melamed J; Huang WC; Lepor H; Taneja SS
    Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):512-7. PubMed ID: 26112001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An Evaluation of Screening Pathways Using a Combination of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-specific Antigen: Results from the IP1-PROSTAGRAM Study.
    Eldred-Evans D; Tam H; Sokhi H; Padhani AR; Connor M; Price D; Gammon M; Klimowska-Nassar N; Burak P; Day E; Winkler M; Fiorentino F; Ahmed HU
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Jun; 6(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 37080821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prostate Cancer Screening with Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Results from the Second Round of the Göteborg Prostate Cancer Screening 2 Trial.
    Wallström J; Geterud K; Kohestani K; Maier SE; Pihl CG; Socratous A; Stranne J; Arnsrud-Godtman R; Månsson M; Hellström M; Hugosson J
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 5(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 34580053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Men's Acceptance of Screening for Prostate Cancer with Prostate-specific Antigen, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Prostate Biopsy.
    Godtman RA; Pettersson C; Svensson L; Kohestani K; Stinesen Bratt K; Wallström J; Månsson M; Hellström M; Hugosson J
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2024 Jun; 7(3):553-562. PubMed ID: 37993370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Population-Based Prostate Cancer Screening With Magnetic Resonance Imaging or Ultrasonography: The IP1-PROSTAGRAM Study.
    Eldred-Evans D; Burak P; Connor MJ; Day E; Evans M; Fiorentino F; Gammon M; Hosking-Jervis F; Klimowska-Nassar N; McGuire W; Padhani AR; Prevost AT; Price D; Sokhi H; Tam H; Winkler M; Ahmed HU
    JAMA Oncol; 2021 Mar; 7(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 33570542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prebiopsy Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined with Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Detecting and Ruling out Gleason 7-10 Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-naïve Men.
    Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 May; 2(3):311-319. PubMed ID: 31200846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies.
    Pokorny MR; de Rooij M; Duncan E; Schröder FH; Parkinson R; Barentsz JO; Thompson LC
    Eur Urol; 2014 Jul; 66(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 24666839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy in Active Surveillance.
    Ma TM; Tosoian JJ; Schaeffer EM; Landis P; Wolf S; Macura KJ; Epstein JI; Mamawala M; Carter HB
    Eur Urol; 2017 Feb; 71(2):174-180. PubMed ID: 27236496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Repeated Prostate Cancer Screening Using Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing and Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Secondary Analysis of the STHLM3-MRI Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Nordström T; Annerstedt M; Glaessgen A; Carlsson S; Clements M; Abbadi A; Grönberg H; Jäderling F; Eklund M; Discacciati A
    JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Feb; 7(2):e2354577. PubMed ID: 38324313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prebiopsy MRI and MRI-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy in Men With Previous Negative Biopsies: Impact on Repeat Biopsy Strategies.
    Mendhiratta N; Meng X; Rosenkrantz AB; Wysock JS; Fenstermaker M; Huang R; Deng FM; Melamed J; Zhou M; Huang WC; Lepor H; Taneja SS
    Urology; 2015 Dec; 86(6):1192-8. PubMed ID: 26335497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Repeat transrectal ultrasound biopsies with additional targeted cores according to results of functional prostate MRI detects high-risk prostate cancer in patients with previous negative biopsy and increased PSA - a pilot study.
    Arsov C; Quentin M; Rabenalt R; Antoch G; Albers P; Blondin D
    Anticancer Res; 2012 Mar; 32(3):1087-92. PubMed ID: 22399637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interim Results from the IMPACT Study: Evidence for Prostate-specific Antigen Screening in BRCA2 Mutation Carriers.
    Page EC; Bancroft EK; Brook MN; Assel M; Hassan Al Battat M; Thomas S; Taylor N; Chamberlain A; Pope J; Raghallaigh HN; Evans DG; Rothwell J; Maehle L; Grindedal EM; James P; Mascarenhas L; McKinley J; Side L; Thomas T; van Asperen C; Vasen H; Kiemeney LA; Ringelberg J; Jensen TD; Osther PJS; Helfand BT; Genova E; Oldenburg RA; Cybulski C; Wokolorczyk D; Ong KR; Huber C; Lam J; Taylor L; Salinas M; Feliubadaló L; Oosterwijk JC; van Zelst-Stams W; Cook J; Rosario DJ; Domchek S; Powers J; Buys S; O'Toole K; Ausems MGEM; Schmutzler RK; Rhiem K; Izatt L; Tripathi V; Teixeira MR; Cardoso M; Foulkes WD; Aprikian A; van Randeraad H; Davidson R; Longmuir M; Ruijs MWG; Helderman van den Enden ATJM; Adank M; Williams R; Andrews L; Murphy DG; Halliday D; Walker L; Liljegren A; Carlsson S; Azzabi A; Jobson I; Morton C; Shackleton K; Snape K; Hanson H; Harris M; Tischkowitz M; Taylor A; Kirk J; Susman R; Chen-Shtoyerman R; Spigelman A; Pachter N; Ahmed M; Ramon Y Cajal T; Zgajnar J; Brewer C; Gadea N; Brady AF; van Os T; Gallagher D; Johannsson O; Donaldson A; Barwell J; Nicolai N; Friedman E; Obeid E; Greenhalgh L; Murthy V; Copakova L; Saya S; McGrath J; Cooke P; Rønlund K; Richardson K; Henderson A; Teo SH; Arun B; Kast K; Dias A; Aaronson NK; Ardern-Jones A; Bangma CH; Castro E; Dearnaley D; Eccles DM; Tricker K; Eyfjord J; Falconer A; Foster C; Gronberg H; Hamdy FC; Stefansdottir V; Khoo V; Lindeman GJ; Lubinski J; Axcrona K; Mikropoulos C; Mitra A; Moynihan C; Rennert G; Suri M; Wilson P; Dudderidge T; ; Offman J; Kote-Jarai Z; Vickers A; Lilja H; Eeles RA
    Eur Urol; 2019 Dec; 76(6):831-842. PubMed ID: 31537406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Population-based randomized trial of screening for clinically significant prostate cancer ProScreen: a pilot study.
    Rannikko A; Leht M; Mirtti T; Kenttämies A; Tolonen T; Rinta-Kiikka I; Kilpeläinen TP; Natunen K; Lilja H; Lehtimäki T; Raitanen J; Kujala P; Ronkainen J; Matikainen M; Petas A; Taari K; Tammela T; Auvinen A
    BJU Int; 2022 Aug; 130(2):193-199. PubMed ID: 34958531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The potential role of prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging combined with prostate-specific antigen density in the detection of prostate cancer.
    Kubota Y; Kamei S; Nakano M; Ehara H; Deguchi T; Tanaka O
    Int J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(4):322-6; discussion 327. PubMed ID: 18380820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy in a Consecutive Cohort of Men with No Previous Biopsy: Reduction of Over Detection through Improved Risk Stratification.
    Mendhiratta N; Rosenkrantz AB; Meng X; Wysock JS; Fenstermaker M; Huang R; Deng FM; Melamed J; Zhou M; Huang WC; Lepor H; Taneja SS
    J Urol; 2015 Dec; 194(6):1601-6. PubMed ID: 26100327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Opportunistic testing versus organized prostate-specific antigen screening: outcome after 18 years in the Göteborg randomized population-based prostate cancer screening trial.
    Arnsrud Godtman R; Holmberg E; Lilja H; Stranne J; Hugosson J
    Eur Urol; 2015 Sep; 68(3):354-60. PubMed ID: 25556937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.