176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26725169)
1. Clinical Evaluation of a 3-D Automatic Annotation Method for Breast Ultrasound Imaging.
Jiang WW; Li C; Li AH; Zheng YP
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Apr; 42(4):870-81. PubMed ID: 26725169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A semi-automated 3-D annotation method for breast ultrasound imaging: system development and feasibility study on phantoms.
Jiang WW; Li AH; Zheng YP
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 40(2):434-46. PubMed ID: 24315389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Whole Breast Ultrasound: Comparison of the Visibility of Suspicious Lesions with Automated Breast Volumetric Scanning Versus Hand-Held Breast Ultrasound.
Kuzmiak CM; Ko EY; Tuttle LA; Steed D; Zeng D; Yoon SC
Acad Radiol; 2015 Jul; 22(7):870-9. PubMed ID: 25872862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interobserver reliability of automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) interpretation and agreement of ABVS findings with hand held breast ultrasound (HHUS), mammography and pathology results.
Golatta M; Franz D; Harcos A; Junkermann H; Rauch G; Scharf A; Schuetz F; Sohn C; Heil J
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 82(8):e332-6. PubMed ID: 23540947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic performance of automated breast ultrasound as a replacement for a hand-held second-look ultrasound for breast lesions detected initially on magnetic resonance imaging.
Chae EY; Shin HJ; Kim HJ; Yoo H; Baek S; Cha JH; Kim HH
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2246-54. PubMed ID: 24035627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automated 3D ultrasound image segmentation to aid breast cancer image interpretation.
Gu P; Lee WM; Roubidoux MA; Yuan J; Wang X; Carson PL
Ultrasonics; 2016 Feb; 65():51-8. PubMed ID: 26547117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast Density Analysis with Automated Whole-Breast Ultrasound: Comparison with 3-D Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Chen JH; Lee YW; Chan SW; Yeh DC; Chang RF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 May; 42(5):1211-20. PubMed ID: 26831342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of eighty-one cases with breast lesions using automated breast volume scanner and comparison with handheld ultrasound.
Lin X; Wang J; Han F; Fu J; Li A
Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):873-8. PubMed ID: 21420814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chest wall segmentation in automated 3D breast ultrasound scans.
Tan T; Platel B; Mann RM; Huisman H; Karssemeijer N
Med Image Anal; 2013 Dec; 17(8):1273-81. PubMed ID: 23273891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An automated 3D annotation method for breast ultrasound imaging.
Jiang WW; Zheng YP
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():488-91. PubMed ID: 23365935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of an automated breast volume ultrasound system for assessment of the pre-operative extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: comparison with a conventional handheld ultrasound examination.
Li N; Jiang YX; Zhu QL; Zhang J; Dai Q; Liu H; Yang Q; Wang HY; Lai XJ; Sun Q
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2255-63. PubMed ID: 24035630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-assisted assessment of ultrasound real-time elastography: initial experience in 145 breast lesions.
Zhang X; Xiao Y; Zeng J; Qiu W; Qian M; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24148563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feasibility Testing: Three-dimensional Tumor Mapping in Different Orientations of Automated Breast Ultrasound.
Lo CM; Chan SW; Yang YW; Chang YC; Huang CS; Jou YS; Chang RF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 May; 42(5):1201-10. PubMed ID: 26825468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interpretation of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) with and without knowledge of mammography: a reader performance study.
Skaane P; Gullien R; Eben EB; Sandhaug M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Stoeblen F
Acta Radiol; 2015 Apr; 56(4):404-12. PubMed ID: 24682405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative study of automated breast 3-D ultrasound and handheld B-mode ultrasound for differentiation of benign and malignant breast masses.
Chen L; Chen Y; Diao XH; Fang L; Pang Y; Cheng AQ; Li WP; Wang Y
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1735-42. PubMed ID: 23849390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adapting content-based image retrieval techniques for the semantic annotation of medical images.
Kumar A; Dyer S; Kim J; Li C; Leong PH; Fulham M; Feng D
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2016 Apr; 49():37-45. PubMed ID: 26890880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Medical breast ultrasound image segmentation by machine learning.
Xu Y; Wang Y; Yuan J; Cheng Q; Wang X; Carson PL
Ultrasonics; 2019 Jan; 91():1-9. PubMed ID: 30029074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automatic mammary duct detection in 3D ultrasound.
Gooding MJ; Mellor M; Shipley JA; Broadbent KA; Goddard DA
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 1):434-41. PubMed ID: 16685875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-Dimensional Assessment of Automated Breast Volume Scanner Compared with Handheld Ultrasound in Pre-Operative Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinomas: A Pilot Study of 51 Cases.
Xu C; Wei S; Xie Y; Guan X; Yang B
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):2089-96. PubMed ID: 27339762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Classification of breast tumors using elastographic and B-mode features: comparison of automatic selection of representative slice and physician-selected slice of images.
Moon WK; Chang SC; Chang JM; Cho N; Huang CS; Kuo JW; Chang RF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Jul; 39(7):1147-57. PubMed ID: 23562018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
