These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26726864)

  • 1. The Development and Preliminary Validation of a Rubric to Assess Medical Students' Written Summary Statements in Virtual Patient Cases.
    Smith S; Kogan JR; Berman NB; Dell MS; Brock DM; Robins LS
    Acad Med; 2016 Jan; 91(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 26726864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The IDEA Assessment Tool: Assessing the Reporting, Diagnostic Reasoning, and Decision-Making Skills Demonstrated in Medical Students' Hospital Admission Notes.
    Baker EA; Ledford CH; Fogg L; Way DP; Park YS
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 25893938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development and Validation of a Tool to Evaluate the Evolution of Clinical Reasoning in Trauma Using Virtual Patients.
    Fleiszer D; Hoover ML; Posel N; Razek T; Bergman S
    J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(3):779-786. PubMed ID: 28927667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fostering and evaluating reflective capacity in medical education: developing the REFLECT rubric for assessing reflective writing.
    Wald HS; Borkan JM; Taylor JS; Anthony D; Reis SP
    Acad Med; 2012 Jan; 87(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 22104060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inter-rater reliability of a reflective rubric to assess pharmacy students' reflective thinking.
    Lucas C; Bosnic-Anticevich S; Schneider CR; Bartimote-Aufflick K; McEntee M; Smith L
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2017 Nov; 9(6):989-995. PubMed ID: 29233396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing students' communication skills: validation of a global rating.
    Scheffer S; Muehlinghaus I; Froehmel A; Ortwein H
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Dec; 13(5):583-92. PubMed ID: 17636371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity evidence for a patient note scoring rubric based on the new patient note format of the United States Medical Licensing Examination.
    Park YS; Lineberry M; Hyderi A; Bordage G; Riddle J; Yudkowsky R
    Acad Med; 2013 Oct; 88(10):1552-7. PubMed ID: 23969362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Writing Across the Curriculum: Reliability Testing of a Standardized Rubric.
    Minnich M; Kirkpatrick AJ; Goodman JT; Whittaker A; Stanton Chapple H; Schoening AM; Khanna MM
    J Nurs Educ; 2018 Jun; 57(6):366-370. PubMed ID: 29863738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Developing Validity Evidence for the Written Pediatric History and Physical Exam Evaluation Rubric.
    King MA; Phillipi CA; Buchanan PM; Lewin LO
    Acad Pediatr; 2017; 17(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 27521461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Rubric to Assess Students' Clinical Reasoning When Encountering Virtual Patients.
    Georg C; Karlgren K; Ulfvarson J; Jirwe M; Welin E
    J Nurs Educ; 2018 Jul; 57(7):408-415. PubMed ID: 29958310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Considerations in the use of reflective writing for student assessment: issues of reliability and validity.
    Moniz T; Arntfield S; Miller K; Lingard L; Watling C; Regehr G
    Med Educ; 2015 Sep; 49(9):901-8. PubMed ID: 26296406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reflection rubric development: evaluating medical students' reflective writing.
    Wald HS; Reis SP; Borkan JM
    Med Educ; 2009 Nov; 43(11):1110-1. PubMed ID: 19799722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Collecting evidence of validity for an assessment tool for Norwegian medical students' non-technical skills (NorMS-NTS): usability and reliability when used by novice raters.
    Prydz K; Dieckmann P; Fagertun H; Musson D; Wisborg T
    BMC Med Educ; 2023 Nov; 23(1):865. PubMed ID: 37968662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development and psychometric testing of a clinical reasoning rubric based on the nursing process.
    Ramazanzadeh N; Ghahramanian A; Zamanzadeh V; Valizadeh L; Ghaffarifar S
    BMC Med Educ; 2023 Feb; 23(1):98. PubMed ID: 36750822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automatic analysis of summary statements in virtual patients - a pilot study evaluating a machine learning approach.
    Hege I; Kiesewetter I; Adler M
    BMC Med Educ; 2020 Oct; 20(1):366. PubMed ID: 33066789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development and Validation of a Rubric to Evaluate Diabetes SOAP Note Writing in APPE.
    Andrus MR; McDonough SLK; Kelley KW; Stamm PL; McCoy EK; Lisenby KM; Whitley HP; Slater N; Carroll DG; Hester EK; Helmer AM; Jackson CW; Byrd DC
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2018 Nov; 82(9):6725. PubMed ID: 30559501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing clinical reasoning abilities of medical students using clinical performance examination.
    Im S; Kim DK; Kong HH; Roh HR; Oh YR; Seo JH
    Korean J Med Educ; 2016 Mar; 28(1):35-47. PubMed ID: 26838567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Developing, evaluating and validating a scoring rubric for written case reports.
    Cyr PR; Smith KA; Broyles IL; Holt CT
    Int J Med Educ; 2014 Feb; 5():18-23. PubMed ID: 25341207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing residents' written learning goals and goal writing skill: validity evidence for the learning goal scoring rubric.
    Lockspeiser TM; Schmitter PA; Lane JL; Hanson JL; Rosenberg AA; Park YS
    Acad Med; 2013 Oct; 88(10):1558-63. PubMed ID: 23969364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can a reflective rubric be applied consistently with raters globally? A study across three countries.
    Lucas C; Smith L; Lonie JM; Hough M; Rogers K; Mantzourani E
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2019 Oct; 11(10):987-994. PubMed ID: 31685182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.