170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26726910)
1. Purity homophily in social networks.
Dehghani M; Johnson K; Hoover J; Sagi E; Garten J; Parmar NJ; Vaisey S; Iliev R; Graham J
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Mar; 145(3):366-75. PubMed ID: 26726910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks.
Brady WJ; Wills JA; Jost JT; Tucker JA; Van Bavel JJ
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Jul; 114(28):7313-7318. PubMed ID: 28652356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Morality-Based Assertion and Homophily on Social Media: A Cultural Comparison Between English and Japanese Languages.
Singh M; Kaur R; Matsuo A; Iyengar SRS; Sasahara K
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():768856. PubMed ID: 34803853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How Moral Perceptions Influence Intergroup Tolerance: Evidence From Lebanon, Morocco, and the United States.
Obeid N; Argo N; Ginges J
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2017 Mar; 43(3):381-391. PubMed ID: 28903690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The MAD Model of Moral Contagion: The Role of Motivation, Attention, and Design in the Spread of Moralized Content Online.
Brady WJ; Crockett MJ; Van Bavel JJ
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2020 Jul; 15(4):978-1010. PubMed ID: 32511060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reconsidering evidence of moral contagion in online social networks.
Burton JW; Cruz N; Hahn U
Nat Hum Behav; 2021 Dec; 5(12):1629-1635. PubMed ID: 34112981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Overperception of moral outrage in online social networks inflates beliefs about intergroup hostility.
Brady WJ; McLoughlin KL; Torres MP; Luo KF; Gendron M; Crockett MJ
Nat Hum Behav; 2023 Jun; 7(6):917-927. PubMed ID: 37037990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Unifying Moral Dyad: Liberals and Conservatives Share the Same Harm-Based Moral Template.
Schein C; Gray K
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1147-63. PubMed ID: 26091912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Purity matters more than harm in moral judgments of suicide: response to Gray (2014).
Rottman J; Kelemen D; Young L
Cognition; 2014 Oct; 133(1):332-4. PubMed ID: 25017511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An ideological asymmetry in the diffusion of moralized content on social media among political leaders.
Brady WJ; Wills JA; Burkart D; Jost JT; Van Bavel JJ
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Oct; 148(10):1802-1813. PubMed ID: 30589291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Strengthening Purity: Moral Purity as a Mediator of Direct and Extended Cross-Group Friendships on Sexual Prejudice.
Vezzali L; Brambilla M; Giovannini D; Paolo Colucci F
J Homosex; 2017; 64(6):716-730. PubMed ID: 27268139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Moralization in social networks and the emergence of violence during protests.
Mooijman M; Hoover J; Lin Y; Ji H; Dehghani M
Nat Hum Behav; 2018 Jun; 2(6):389-396. PubMed ID: 31024159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Moral intuitions and political orientation: similarities and differences between South Korea and the United States.
Kim KR; Kang JS; Yun S
Psychol Rep; 2012 Aug; 111(1):173-85. PubMed ID: 23045859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Online Moral Disengagement, Cyberbullying, and Cyber-Aggression.
Runions KC; Bak M
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2015 Jul; 18(7):400-5. PubMed ID: 26167839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bad guys suffer less (social pain): Moral status influences judgements of others' social suffering.
Riva P; Brambilla M; Vaes J
Br J Soc Psychol; 2016 Mar; 55(1):88-108. PubMed ID: 25891265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is Online Moral Outrage Outrageous? Rethinking the Indignation Machine.
Mihailov E; Voinea C; Vică C
Sci Eng Ethics; 2023 Mar; 29(2):12. PubMed ID: 37000374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The new synthesis in moral psychology.
Haidt J
Science; 2007 May; 316(5827):998-1002. PubMed ID: 17510357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Moral alchemy: How love changes norms.
Magid RW; Schulz LE
Cognition; 2017 Oct; 167():135-150. PubMed ID: 28404207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Social media reduce users' moral sensitivity: Online shaming as a possible consequence.
Ge X
Aggress Behav; 2020 Sep; 46(5):359-369. PubMed ID: 32488967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Liberals and conservatives rely on common moral foundations when making moral judgments about influential people.
Frimer JA; Biesanz JC; Walker LJ; MacKinlay CW
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Jun; 104(6):1040-59. PubMed ID: 23586414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
