BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26726942)

  • 1. Upfront plerixafor plus G-CSF versus cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF for stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: efficacy and cost analysis study.
    Afifi S; Adel NG; Devlin S; Duck E; Vanak J; Landau H; Chung DJ; Lendvai N; Lesokhin A; Korde N; Reich L; Landgren O; Giralt S; Hassoun H
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2016 Apr; 51(4):546-52. PubMed ID: 26726942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. G-CSF plus preemptive plerixafor vs hyperfractionated CY plus G-CSF for autologous stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: effectiveness, safety and cost analysis.
    Antar A; Otrock ZK; Kharfan-Dabaja MA; Ghaddara HA; Kreidieh N; Mahfouz R; Bazarbachi A
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2015 Jun; 50(6):813-7. PubMed ID: 25751646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma patients treat in the novel therapy-era with plerixafor and G-CSF has superior efficacy but significantly higher costs compared to mobilization with low-dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF.
    Chaudhary L; Awan F; Cumpston A; Leadmon S; Watkins K; Tse W; Craig M; Hamadani M
    J Clin Apher; 2013 Oct; 28(5):359-67. PubMed ID: 23765597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost and clinical analysis of autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization with G-CSF and plerixafor compared to G-CSF and cyclophosphamide.
    Shaughnessy P; Islas-Ohlmayer M; Murphy J; Hougham M; MacPherson J; Winkler K; Silva M; Steinberg M; Matous J; Selvey S; Maris M; McSweeney PA
    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2011 May; 17(5):729-36. PubMed ID: 20813198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Plerixafor plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus placebo plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of CD34(+) hematopoietic stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma and low peripheral blood CD34(+) cell count: results of a subset analysis of a randomized trial.
    Nademanee AP; DiPersio JF; Maziarz RT; Stadtmauer EA; Micallef IN; Stiff PJ; Hsu FJ; Bridger G; Bolwell BJ
    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2012 Oct; 18(10):1564-72. PubMed ID: 22683613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost analysis of a randomized stem cell mobilization study in multiple myeloma.
    Varmavuo V; Silvennoinen R; Anttila P; Säily M; Sankelo M; Putkonen M; Ahonen J; Mahlamäki E; Mäntymaa P; Savolainen ER; Remes K; Jantunen E
    Ann Hematol; 2016 Oct; 95(10):1653-9. PubMed ID: 27485453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of chemo-free strategy with G-CSF plus plerixafor on demand versus intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF as PBSC mobilization in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: An Italian explorative cost Analysis.
    Laszlo D; Marcacci GP; Martino M; Radice D; Rabascio C; Lucchetti B; Magarò A; Caime A; Menna S; Lionetti MT; Bertolini F
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2020 Oct; 59(5):102819. PubMed ID: 32499108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Plerixafor: A chemokine receptor-4 antagonist for mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells for transplantation after high-dose chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or multiple myeloma.
    Steinberg M; Silva M
    Clin Ther; 2010 May; 32(5):821-43. PubMed ID: 20685493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparable efficacy and lower cost of PBSC mobilization with intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF compared with plerixafor and G-CSF in patients with multiple myeloma treated with novel therapies.
    Awan F; Kochuparambil ST; Falconer DE; Cumpston A; Leadmon S; Watkins K; Deremer D; Jillella A; Craig M; Hamadani M
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2013 Oct; 48(10):1279-84. PubMed ID: 23584435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Plerixafor on-demand combined with chemotherapy and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: significant improvement in peripheral blood stem cells mobilization and harvest with no increase in costs.
    Milone G; Martino M; Spadaro A; Leotta S; Di Marco A; Scalzulli P; Cupri A; Di Martina V; Schinocca E; Spina E; Tripepi G
    Br J Haematol; 2014 Jan; 164(1):113-23. PubMed ID: 24138497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Pilot, Exploratory, Randomized, Phase II Safety Study Evaluating Tumor Cell Mobilization and Apheresis Product Contamination in Patients Treated with Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Alone or Plus Plerixafor.
    Nahi H; Celanovic M; Liu Q; Lund J; Peceliunas V
    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2019 Jan; 25(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 30149148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Low-Dose Cyclophosphamide versus Intermediate-High-Dose Cyclophosphamide versus Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Alone for Stem Cell Mobilization in Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Novel Agents: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.
    Zannetti BA; Saraceni F; Cellini C; Fabbri E; Monaco F; Guarini A; Laszlo D; Martino M; Olivieri A; Imola M; Tosi P; Chiarucci M; Zuffa E; Lanza F
    Transplant Cell Ther; 2021 Mar; 27(3):244.e1-244.e8. PubMed ID: 33781522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rescue stem cell mobilization with plerixafor economizes leukapheresis in patients with multiple myeloma.
    Hundemer M; Engelhardt M; Bruckner T; Kraeker S; Schmitt A; Sauer S; Neben K; Witzens-Harig M; Goldschmidt H; Ho AD; Wuchter P
    J Clin Apher; 2014 Dec; 29(6):299-304. PubMed ID: 24771277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness and cost analysis of "just-in-time" salvage plerixafor administration in autologous transplant patients with poor stem cell mobilization kinetics.
    Li J; Hamilton E; Vaughn L; Graiser M; Renfroe H; Lechowicz MJ; Langston A; Prichard JM; Anderson D; Gleason C; Lonial S; Flowers CR; Kaufman JL; Waller EK
    Transfusion; 2011 Oct; 51(10):2175-82. PubMed ID: 21492180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Upfront use of plerixafor and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (GCSF) for stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma: efficacy and analysis of risk factors associated with poor stem cell collection efficiency.
    Ogunniyi A; Rodriguez M; Devlin S; Adel N; Landau H; Chung DJ; Lendvai N; Lesokhin A; Koehne G; Mailankody S; Korde N; Reich L; Landgren O; Giralt S; Hassoun H
    Leuk Lymphoma; 2017 May; 58(5):1123-1129. PubMed ID: 27735212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization with "just-in-time" plerixafor approach is a cost-effective alternative to routine plerixafor use.
    Veltri L; Cumpston A; Shillingburg A; Wen S; Luo J; Leadmon S; Watkins K; Craig M; Hamadani M; Kanate AS
    Cytotherapy; 2015 Dec; 17(12):1785-92. PubMed ID: 26475754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A combination of low-dose cyclophosphamide and colony-stimulating factors is more cost-effective than granulocyte-colony-stimulating factors alone in mobilizing peripheral blood stem and progenitor cells.
    Meisenberg B; Brehm T; Schmeckel A; Miller W; McMillan R
    Transfusion; 1998 Feb; 38(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 9531956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized cross-over trial of progenitor-cell mobilization: high-dose cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus G-CSF.
    Koç ON; Gerson SL; Cooper BW; Laughlin M; Meyerson H; Kutteh L; Fox RM; Szekely EM; Tainer N; Lazarus HM
    J Clin Oncol; 2000 May; 18(9):1824-30. PubMed ID: 10784622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Plerixafor and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with lymphoma and multiple myeloma previously failing mobilization with G-CSF with or without chemotherapy for autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization: the Austrian experience on a named patient program.
    Worel N; Rosskopf K; Neumeister P; Kasparu H; Nachbaur D; Russ G; Namberger K; Witt V; Schloegl E; Zojer N; Linkesch W; Kalhs P; Greinix HT
    Transfusion; 2011 May; 51(5):968-75. PubMed ID: 20880037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcomes and costs of autologous stem cell mobilization with chemotherapy plus G-CSF vs G-CSF alone.
    Sung AD; Grima DT; Bernard LM; Brown S; Carrum G; Holmberg L; Horwitz ME; Liesveld JL; Kanda J; McClune B; Shaughnessy P; Tricot GJ; Chao NJ
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2013 Nov; 48(11):1444-9. PubMed ID: 23749109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.