211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26726942)
21. Patients' outcome after rescue plerixafor administration for autologous stem cell mobilization: a single-center retrospective analysis.
Spoerl S; Peter R; Wäscher D; Götze K; Verbeek M; Peschel C; Krackhardt AM
Transfusion; 2017 Jan; 57(1):115-121. PubMed ID: 27859332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cost-effectiveness of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization strategies including plerixafor in multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients.
Tichopád A; Vítová V; Kořístek Z; Lysák D
J Clin Apher; 2013 Dec; 28(6):395-403. PubMed ID: 23922227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Stem Cell Mobilization in Multiple Myeloma: Comparing Safety and Efficacy of Cyclophosphamide +/- Plerixafor versus Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor +/- Plerixafor in the Lenalidomide Era.
Johnsrud A; Ladha A; Muffly L; Shiraz P; Goldstein G; Osgood V; Shizuru JA; Johnston L; Arai S; Weng WK; Lowsky R; Rezvani AR; Meyer EH; Frank MJ; Negrin RS; Miklos DB; Sidana S
Transplant Cell Ther; 2021 Jul; 27(7):590.e1-590.e8. PubMed ID: 33915323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Beyond CD34+ cell dose: impact of method of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilization (granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF], G-CSF plus plerixafor, or cyclophosphamide G-CSF/granulocyte-macrophage [GM]-CSF) on number of colony-forming unit-GM, engraftment, and Day +100 hematopoietic graft function.
Alexander ET; Towery JA; Miller AN; Kramer C; Hogan KR; Squires JE; Stuart RK; Costa LJ
Transfusion; 2011 Sep; 51(9):1995-2000. PubMed ID: 21392017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Plerixafor in combination with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor after chemotherapy increases mobilization efficiency in patients with lymphoma or myeloma: results of a Phase II clinical trial.
Jagirdar N; Harvey RD; Nooka A; Flowers C; Kaufman J; Lonial S; Lechowicz MJ; Langston A; Lipscomb C; Gaylor C; Waller EK
Transfusion; 2015 Oct; 55(10):2351-7. PubMed ID: 26331348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of the efficiency, safety, and survival outcomes in two stem cell mobilization regimens with cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF or G-CSF alone in multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis.
Wang L; Xiang H; Yan Y; Deng Z; Li H; Li X; Liu J
Ann Hematol; 2021 Feb; 100(2):563-573. PubMed ID: 33404694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Plerixafor injection: a hematopoietic stem cell mobilizer in non-Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma.
Jantunen E; Varmavuo V; Valtola J
Expert Rev Hematol; 2016 Aug; 9(8):723-32. PubMed ID: 27355397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Impact of mobilization and remobilization strategies on achieving sufficient stem cell yields for autologous transplantation.
Pusic I; Jiang SY; Landua S; Uy GL; Rettig MP; Cashen AF; Westervelt P; Vij R; Abboud CN; Stockerl-Goldstein KE; Sempek DS; Smith AL; DiPersio JF
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2008 Sep; 14(9):1045-1056. PubMed ID: 18721768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Chemotherapy-based versus chemotherapy-free stem cell mobilization (± plerixafor) in multiple myeloma patients: an Italian cost-effectiveness analysis.
Lazzaro C; Castagna L; Lanza F; Laszlo D; Milone G; Pierelli L; Saccardi R
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2021 Aug; 56(8):1876-1887. PubMed ID: 33753907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma.
Lin TL; Wang PN; Kuo MC; Hung YH; Chang H; Tang TC
J Clin Apher; 2016 Oct; 31(5):423-8. PubMed ID: 26340986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Plerixafor as first- and second-line strategies for autologous stem cell mobilization in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or multiple myeloma.
Lor KW; Helmons PJ; Belew H; Lane JR; Ball ED
Pharmacotherapy; 2012 Jul; 32(7):596-603. PubMed ID: 22760691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Peripheral blood CD34+ cell monitoring after cyclophosphamide and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor: an algorithm for the pre-emptive use of plerixafor.
Farina L; Spina F; Guidetti A; Longoni P; Ravagnani F; Dodero A; Montefusco V; Carlo-Stella C; Corradini P
Leuk Lymphoma; 2014 Feb; 55(2):331-6. PubMed ID: 23656194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. CD34+ cell subclasses and lymphocyte subsets in blood grafts collected after various mobilization methods in myeloma patients.
Varmavuo V; Mäntymaa P; Silvennoinen R; Nousiainen T; Kuittinen T; Jantunen E
Transfusion; 2013 May; 53(5):1024-32. PubMed ID: 22897584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Intermediate-dose versus low-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma treated with novel induction therapies.
Hamadani M; Kochuparambil ST; Osman S; Cumpston A; Leadmon S; Bunner P; Watkins K; Morrison D; Speir E; Deremer D; Kota V; Jillella A; Craig M; Awan F
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2012 Jul; 18(7):1128-35. PubMed ID: 22248715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Randomized comparison of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus intensive chemotherapy for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma.
Arora M; Burns LJ; Barker JN; Miller JS; Defor TE; Olujohungbe AB; Weisdorf DJ
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2004 Jun; 10(6):395-404. PubMed ID: 15148493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical and cost outcomes of pre-emptive plerixafor administration in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing stem cell mobilization.
Andritsos LA; Huang Y; Abraham I; Huff K; Scrape SR; Fan T; Alkhatib N; Hofmeister CC; Drea E; McBride A
Leuk Res; 2019 Oct; 85():106215. PubMed ID: 31470355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Impact of Single-Dose Plerixafor as an Adjunct to Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor-Based Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization on the Graft Composition and Outcome for T Cell-Replete Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide: A Comparative Study.
Jaiswal SR; Bhakuni P; Joy A; Murli N; Bharadwaj P; Zaman S; Nedunchezian M; Chakrabarti S
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2018 Mar; 24(3):542-548. PubMed ID: 29191663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Retrospective comparison of filgrastim plus plerixafor to other regimens for remobilization after primary mobilization failure: clinical and economic outcomes.
Perkins JB; Shapiro JF; Bookout RN; Yee GC; Anasetti C; Janssen WE; Fernandez HF
Am J Hematol; 2012 Jul; 87(7):673-7. PubMed ID: 22674468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Pharmacoeconomic impact of up-front use of plerixafor for autologous stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma.
Kim SS; Renteria AS; Steinberg A; Banoff K; Isola L
Cytotherapy; 2014 Nov; 16(11):1584-1589. PubMed ID: 24927717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Successful stem cell remobilization using plerixafor (mozobil) plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with non-hodgkin lymphoma: results from the plerixafor NHL phase 3 study rescue protocol.
Micallef IN; Stiff PJ; DiPersio JF; Maziarz RT; McCarty JM; Bridger G; Calandra G
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2009 Dec; 15(12):1578-86. PubMed ID: 19896082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
