305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26727552)
1. Dynamic Management of NOx and SO2 Emissions in the Texas and Mid-Atlantic Electric Power Systems and Implications for Air Quality.
McDonald-Buller E; Kimura Y; Craig M; McGaughey G; Allen D; Webster M
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Feb; 50(3):1611-9. PubMed ID: 26727552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Expected ozone benefits of reducing nitrogen oxide (NO
Vinciguerra T; Bull E; Canty T; He H; Zalewsky E; Woodman M; Aburn G; Ehrman S; Dickerson RR
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Mar; 67(3):279-291. PubMed ID: 27650304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Flexible NO(x) abatement from power plants in the eastern United States.
Sun L; Webster M; McGaughey G; McDonald-Buller EC; Thompson T; Prinn R; Ellerman AD; Allen DT
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 May; 46(10):5607-15. PubMed ID: 22432925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spatially and Temporally Resolved Analysis of Environmental Trade-Offs in Electricity Generation.
Peer RA; Garrison JB; Timms CP; Sanders KT
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Apr; 50(8):4537-45. PubMed ID: 26967826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recent increases in nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from coal-fired electric generating units equipped with selective catalytic reduction.
McNevin TF
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Jan; 66(1):66-75. PubMed ID: 26563500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implications of near-term coal power plant retirement for SO2 and NOX and life cycle GHG emissions.
Venkatesh A; Jaramillo P; Griffin WM; Matthews HS
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 46(18):9838-45. PubMed ID: 22888978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effective reduction of NOx emissions from electricity generation.
Burtraw D; Palmer K; Bharvirkar R; Paul A
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2001 Oct; 51(10):1476-89. PubMed ID: 11686253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Economics of an integrated approach to control SO2, NOX, HCl, and particulate emissions from power plants.
Shemwell BE; Ergut A; Levendis YA
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2002 May; 52(5):521-34. PubMed ID: 12022692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Health and air quality benefits of policies to reduce coal-fired power plant emissions: a case study in North Carolina.
Li YR; Gibson JM
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Sep; 48(17):10019-27. PubMed ID: 25046689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modeling the effects of changes in new source review on national SO2 and NOx emissions from electricity-generating units.
Evans DA; Hobbs BF; Oren C; Palmer KL
Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Jan; 42(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 18284129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Are renewables portfolio standards cost-effective emission abatement policy?
Dobesova K; Apt J; Lave LB
Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Nov; 39(22):8578-83. PubMed ID: 16323750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Benefits of current and future policies on emissions of China's coal-fired power sector indicated by continuous emission monitoring.
Zhang Y; Bo X; Zhao Y; Nielsen CP
Environ Pollut; 2019 Aug; 251():415-424. PubMed ID: 31103001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Temporalization of peak electric generation particulate matter emissions during high energy demand days.
Farkas CM; Moeller MD; Felder FA; Baker KR; Rodgers M; Carlton AG
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Apr; 49(7):4696-704. PubMed ID: 25705922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Regional ozone impacts of increased natural gas use in the Texas power sector and development in the Eagle Ford shale.
Pacsi AP; Kimura Y; McGaughey G; McDonald-Buller EC; Allen DT
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Mar; 49(6):3966-73. PubMed ID: 25723953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Air quality co-benefits of subnational carbon policies.
Thompson TM; Rausch S; Saari RK; Selin NE
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Oct; 66(10):988-1002. PubMed ID: 27216236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Emissions impacts of wind and energy storage in a market environment.
Sioshansi R
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Dec; 45(24):10728-35. PubMed ID: 22044253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The London low emission zone baseline study.
Kelly F; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Anderson HR; Barratt B; Beevers S; Cook D; Green D; Derwent D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Nov; (163):3-79. PubMed ID: 22315924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Air quality and health benefits from potential coal power plant closures in Texas.
Strasert B; Teh SC; Cohan DS
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2019 Mar; 69(3):333-350. PubMed ID: 30339492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ozone monitoring instrument observations of interannual increases in SO2 emissions from Indian coal-fired power plants during 2005-2012.
Lu Z; Streets DG; de Foy B; Krotkov NA
Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Dec; 47(24):13993-4000. PubMed ID: 24274462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
