These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2672764)
1. Cardiovascular effects of contrast agents. Dawson P Am J Cardiol; 1989 Sep; 64(9):2E-9E. PubMed ID: 2672764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the cardiovascular responses to carotid injections of ionic and nonionic contrast media. Morris TW; Francis M; Fischer HW Invest Radiol; 1979; 14(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 468493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of ionic and nonionic contrast media on cardiohemodynamics and quality of radiographic image during canine angiography. Nakamura H; Kurata M; Haruta K; Takeda K J Vet Med Sci; 1994 Feb; 56(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 8204767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects in man of a new nonionic contrast agent (iohexol): advantages over standard ionic agents. Mancini GB; Bloomquist JN; Bhargava V; Stein JB; Lew W; Slutsky RA; Shabetai R; Higgins CB Am J Cardiol; 1983 Apr; 51(7):1218-22. PubMed ID: 6837464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of intra-arterial injection of radiopaque contrast media on coronary blood flow. TALBERT JL; JOYCE EE; SABISTON DC Surgery; 1959 Aug; 46(2):400-6. PubMed ID: 13675972 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the hemodynamic effects of intravenous administration of ionic and nonionic contrast materials. Implications for deriving physiologic measurements from computed tomography and digital cardiovascular imaging. Higgins CB; Gerber KH; Mattrey RF; Slutsky RA Radiology; 1982 Mar; 142(3):681-6. PubMed ID: 7063684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of contrast media on pulmonary hemodynamics: comparison of ionic and non-ionic agents. Peck WW; Slutsky RA; Hackney DB; Mancini GB; Higgins CB Radiology; 1983 Nov; 149(2):371-4. PubMed ID: 6622678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative effects of ionic anc nonionic contrast materials on coronary and peripheral blood flow. Gerber KH; Higgins CB Invest Radiol; 1982; 17(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 7118518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hemodynamic characteristics, myocardial kinetics and microvascular rheology of FS-069, a second-generation echocardiographic contrast agent capable of producing myocardial opacification from a venous injection. Skyba DM; Camarano G; Goodman NC; Price RJ; Skalak TC; Kaul S J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Nov; 28(5):1292-300. PubMed ID: 8890829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Acute cardiac side effects of iodecol, a new nonionic dimer roentgen contrast medium, in intracoronary injection]. Schräder R; Hoeft A; Hoeft T; Korb H; Wolpers HG; Kober G; Hellige G Z Kardiol; 1985 Oct; 74(10):604-10. PubMed ID: 4072332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrocardiographic evidence of collateral supply to myocardium through pericardial splenosis. Movitz D Am J Cardiol; 1969 Sep; 24(3):369-75. PubMed ID: 5805197 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Pharmacologic action of current x-ray contrast media used in experimental and clinical coronarography (review of the literature)]. Sviridov NK; Varfolomeeva VN Farmakol Toksikol; 1981; 44(3):376-81. PubMed ID: 7286192 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Systemic and coronary vascular effects of the 2- and the 5-mononitrate esters of isosorbide. Wendt RL J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1972 Mar; 180(3):732-42. PubMed ID: 4622308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]