BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

606 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26730526)

  • 1. Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy in the Revision Versus Primary Adult Spinal Deformity Patient: Is There a Difference in Correction and Complications?
    Gupta MC; Ferrero E; Mundis G; Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Schwab F; Kim HJ; Boachie-Adjei O; Lafage V; Bess S; Hostin R; Burton DC; Ames CP; Kebaish K; Klineberg E;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Nov; 40(22):E1169-75. PubMed ID: 26730526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Posterior global malalignment after osteotomy for sagittal plane deformity: it happens and here is why.
    Blondel B; Schwab F; Bess S; Ames C; Mummaneni PV; Hart R; Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Burton D; Boachie-Adjei O; Lafage V
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Apr; 38(7):E394-401. PubMed ID: 23324927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiographic outcome and complications after single-level lumbar extended pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal malalignment: a retrospective analysis of 55 adult spinal deformity patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up.
    Buell TJ; Nguyen JH; Mazur MD; Mullin JP; Garces J; Taylor DG; Yen CP; Shaffrey ME; Shaffrey CI; Smith JS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Nov; 30(2):242-252. PubMed ID: 30497176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does vertebral level of pedicle subtraction osteotomy correlate with degree of spinopelvic parameter correction?
    Lafage V; Schwab F; Vira S; Hart R; Burton D; Smith JS; Boachie-Adjei O; Shelokov A; Hostin R; Shaffrey CI; Gupta M; Akbarnia BA; Bess S; Farcy JP
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Feb; 14(2):184-91. PubMed ID: 21184642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective multicenter assessment of risk factors for rod fracture following surgery for adult spinal deformity.
    Smith JS; Shaffrey E; Klineberg E; Shaffrey CI; Lafage V; Schwab FJ; Protopsaltis T; Scheer JK; Mundis GM; Fu KM; Gupta MC; Hostin R; Deviren V; Kebaish K; Hart R; Burton DC; Line B; Bess S; Ames CP;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):994-1003. PubMed ID: 25325175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of spinopelvic morphology on the short-term outcome of pedicle subtraction osteotomy in 104 patients.
    Eskilsson K; Sharma D; Johansson C; Hedlund R
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Jul; 27(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 28452632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Utility of multilevel lateral interbody fusion of the thoracolumbar coronal curve apex in adult deformity surgery in combination with open posterior instrumentation and L5-S1 interbody fusion: a case-matched evaluation of 32 patients.
    Theologis AA; Mundis GM; Nguyen S; Okonkwo DO; Mummaneni PV; Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Fessler R; Bess S; Schwab F; Diebo BG; Burton D; Hart R; Deviren V; Ames C;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):208-219. PubMed ID: 27767682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correction of severe spinopelvic mismatch: decreased blood loss with lateral hyperlordotic interbody grafts as compared with pedicle subtraction osteotomy.
    Leveque JC; Yanamadala V; Buchlak QD; Sethi RK
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E15. PubMed ID: 28760028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lateral interbody fusion combined with open posterior surgery for adult spinal deformity.
    Strom RG; Bae J; Mizutani J; Valone F; Ames CP; Deviren V
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):697-705. PubMed ID: 27341052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mini-open pedicle subtraction osteotomy as a treatment for severe adult spinal deformities: case series with initial clinical and radiographic outcomes.
    Wang MY; Bordon G
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 May; 24(5):769-76. PubMed ID: 26745348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a comprehensive analysis in 104 patients. Does the cause of deformity influence the outcome?
    Eskilsson K; Sharma D; Johansson C; Hedlund R
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Jul; 27(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 28475018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The likelihood of reaching minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit at 2 years following a 3-column osteotomy: analysis of 140 patients.
    Fakurnejad S; Scheer JK; Lafage V; Smith JS; Deviren V; Hostin R; Mundis GM; Burton DC; Klineberg E; Gupta M; Kebaish K; Shaffrey CI; Bess S; Schwab F; Ames CP;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 26091440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective multicenter assessment of perioperative and minimum 2-year postoperative complication rates associated with adult spinal deformity surgery.
    Smith JS; Klineberg E; Lafage V; Shaffrey CI; Schwab F; Lafage R; Hostin R; Mundis GM; Errico TJ; Kim HJ; Protopsaltis TS; Hamilton DK; Scheer JK; Soroceanu A; Kelly MP; Line B; Gupta M; Deviren V; Hart R; Burton DC; Bess S; Ames CP;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jul; 25(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 26918574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Complication rates associated with 3-column osteotomy in 82 adult spinal deformity patients: retrospective review of a prospectively collected multicenter consecutive series with 2-year follow-up.
    Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Klineberg E; Lafage V; Schwab F; Lafage R; Kim HJ; Hostin R; Mundis GM; Gupta M; Liabaud B; Scheer JK; Diebo BG; Protopsaltis TS; Kelly MP; Deviren V; Hart R; Burton D; Bess S; Ames CP;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):444-457. PubMed ID: 28291402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sagittal alignment and complications following lumbar 3-column osteotomy: does the level of resection matter?
    Ferrero E; Liabaud B; Henry JK; Ames CP; Kebaish K; Mundis GM; Hostin R; Gupta MC; Boachie-Adjei O; Smith JS; Hart RA; Obeid I; Diebo BG; Schwab FJ; Lafage V
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Nov; 27(5):560-569. PubMed ID: 28885128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spontaneous improvement of cervical alignment after correction of global sagittal balance following pedicle subtraction osteotomy.
    Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Lafage V; Blondel B; Schwab F; Hostin R; Hart R; O'Shaughnessy B; Bess S; Hu SS; Deviren V; Ames CP;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Oct; 17(4):300-7. PubMed ID: 22860879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in thoracic kyphosis negatively impact sagittal alignment after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a comprehensive radiographic analysis.
    Lafage V; Ames C; Schwab F; Klineberg E; Akbarnia B; Smith J; Boachie-Adjei O; Burton D; Hart R; Hostin R; Shaffrey C; Wood K; Bess S;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Feb; 37(3):E180-7. PubMed ID: 21673626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preliminary results of anterior lumbar interbody fusion, anterior column realignment for the treatment of sagittal malalignment.
    Hosseini P; Mundis GM; Eastlack RK; Bagheri R; Vargas E; Tran S; Akbarnia BA
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Dec; 43(6):E6. PubMed ID: 29191100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multilevel Schwab grade II osteotomies for sagittal plane correction in the management of adult spinal deformity.
    Ghobrial GM; Lebwohl NH; Green BA; Gjolaj JP
    Spine J; 2017 Nov; 17(11):1594-1600. PubMed ID: 28502881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Maintenance of radiographic correction at 2 years following lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy is superior with upper thoracic compared with thoracolumbar junction upper instrumented vertebra.
    Scheer JK; Lafage V; Smith JS; Deviren V; Hostin R; McCarthy IM; Mundis GM; Burton DC; Klineberg E; Gupta M; Kebaish K; Shaffrey CI; Bess S; Schwab F; Ames CP;
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Jan; 24 Suppl 1():S121-30. PubMed ID: 24880236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.