These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 267313)

  • 21. Dimensional accuracy of improved dental stone and epoxy resin die materials. Part II: Complete arch form.
    Chaffee NR; Bailey JH; Sherrard DJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Mar; 77(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 9069076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of linear-linear and hyperbranched-linear dental composite.
    Darmawati MY; Ismarul N; Fuad Y; Fazan F
    Med J Malaysia; 2004 May; 59 Suppl B():27-8. PubMed ID: 15468802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Isosit, a new filling material].
    Mannerberg F
    Quintessenz; 1977 Apr; 28(4):33-42. PubMed ID: 273265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Comparison between physical properties of resin materials and those of gypsum materials for dental models and dies (author's transl)].
    Hirasawa T; Nagamitsu T
    Shika Rikogaku Zasshi; 1976 May; 17(38):139-44. PubMed ID: 1066406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Application of 4-META on adhesive opaque resin. (Part 1) Adhesive strength and the stability (author's transl)].
    Tanaka T; Nagata K; Nakabayashi N; Masuhara E
    Shika Rikogaku Zasshi; 1979 Apr; 20(50):79-84. PubMed ID: 385794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Compatibility of a new epoxy resin with impression materials.
    Schelb E; Baracat SA; Almaguer R
    Am J Dent; 1990 Aug; 3(4):171-4. PubMed ID: 2076244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Characteristics and properties of an epoxy resin used for dies].
    Ribas LM; Macchi RL
    Rev Asoc Odontol Argent; 1983 Jun; 71(2):58-60. PubMed ID: 6587455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Acryloxide--a new filling material].
    Ivanov VS; Rybakov AI; Afans'eva MI; Karal'nik DM; Dan'shina GS; Shteĭngart MZ; Gorovoi BIa; Bliakhman EM; Kondaurov VN; Pochivalin VP
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1971; 50(6):18-20. PubMed ID: 4943117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Absorption of water by different restorative resins].
    Santos A; Ribeiro SA; Steagall L
    Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent; 1977; 31(5):282-5. PubMed ID: 276009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Restorative resins].
    Flim GJ
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1971 Dec; 78(12):429-38. PubMed ID: 5290354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Composite and non-composite plastic materials used for incisor fillings by the etching technic].
    Christensen JL; Engsig CJ; Fejerskov O
    Tandlaegebladet; 1973 Sep; 77(9):857-60. PubMed ID: 4616410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of pre-heated composites and flowable liners on Class II gingival margin gap formation.
    Sabatini C; Blunck U; Denehy G; Munoz C
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):663-71. PubMed ID: 21180006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
    Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of storage time on the accuracy and dimensional stability of reversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Schleier PE; Gardner FM; Nelson SK; Pashley DH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 11552162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Distance alterations of dies in sagittal direction in dependence of the die material.
    Schäffer H; Dumfahrt H; Gausch K
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Jun; 61(6):684-8. PubMed ID: 2657025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A strain gauge analysis of microstrain induced by various splinting methods and acrylic resin types for implant impressions.
    Cerqueira NM; Ozcan M; Gonçalves M; da Rocha DM; Vasconcellos DK; Bottino MA; Yener-Salihoğlu E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):341-5. PubMed ID: 22442773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of accuracy of multiple dental implant impressions using various splinting materials.
    Hariharan R; Shankar C; Rajan M; Baig MR; Azhagarasan NS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 20209185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.
    Rashidan N; Alikhasi M; Samadizadeh S; Beyabanaki E; Kharazifard MJ
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19804420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Methods for reinforcing acrylic resins].
    Chiru-Mocanu M; Vlad I; Ciubotaru S; Mihalache C; Teodorescu T; Buţureanu E
    Stomatologia (Bucur); 1972; 19(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 4504874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Long-term effects of storage and thermal cycling on the marginal adaptation of provisional resin crowns: a pilot study.
    Ehrenberg D; Weiner GI; Weiner S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 16543021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.