394 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26731414)
1. Sexual Conflict and Gender Gap Effects: Associations between Social Context and Sex on Rated Attractiveness and Economic Status.
Gouda-Vossos A; Dixson BJ; Brooks RC
PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146269. PubMed ID: 26731414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The perception of sexual attractiveness: sex differences in variability.
Townsend JM; Wasserman T
Arch Sex Behav; 1997 Jun; 26(3):243-68. PubMed ID: 9146813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Interplay Between Economic Status and Attractiveness, and the Importance of Attire in Mate Choice Judgments.
Gouda-Vossos A; Brooks RC; Dixson BJW
Front Psychol; 2019; 10():462. PubMed ID: 30949084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sexual dimorphism of male face shape, partnership status and the temporal context of relationship sought modulate women's preferences for direct gaze.
Conway CA; Jones BC; DeBruine LM; Little AC
Br J Psychol; 2010 Feb; 101(Pt 1):109-21. PubMed ID: 19460236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lip colour affects perceived sex typicality and attractiveness of human faces.
Stephen ID; McKeegan AM
Perception; 2010; 39(8):1104-10. PubMed ID: 20942361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Judging the differences between women's attractiveness and health: is there really a difference between judgments made by men and women?
Stephen ID; Perera AT
Body Image; 2014 Mar; 11(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 24405818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The mere presence of opposite-sex others on judgments of sexual and romantic desirability: opposite effects for men and women.
Hill SE; Buss DM
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 May; 34(5):635-47. PubMed ID: 18303129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The masculinity paradox: facial masculinity and beardedness interact to determine women's ratings of men's facial attractiveness.
Dixson BJ; Sulikowski D; Gouda-Vossos A; Rantala MJ; Brooks RC
J Evol Biol; 2016 Nov; 29(11):2311-2320. PubMed ID: 27488414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Environmental convergence in facial preferences: a cross-group comparison of Asian Vietnamese, Czech Vietnamese, and Czechs.
Pavlovič O; Fiala V; Kleisner K
Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):550. PubMed ID: 33436663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Discriminating males and unpredictable females: males differentiate self-similar facial cues more than females in the judgment of opposite-sex attractiveness.
Zhuang JY; Zhang S; Xu J; Hu D
PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e90493. PubMed ID: 24594644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perception of men's beauty and attractiveness by women with low sexual desire.
Ferdenzi C; Delplanque S; Vorontsova-Wenger O; Pool E; Bianchi-Demicheli F; Sander D
J Sex Med; 2015 Apr; 12(4):946-55. PubMed ID: 25496510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sex differences in judgments of physical attractiveness: a social relations analysis.
Marcus DK; Miller RS
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Mar; 29(3):325-35. PubMed ID: 15273010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Miscalibrations in judgements of attractiveness with cosmetics.
Jones AL; Kramer RS; Ward R
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Oct; 67(10):2060-8. PubMed ID: 24670156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sex differences in sexual attraction for aesthetics, resources and personality across age.
Whyte S; Brooks RC; Chan HF; Torgler B
PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0250151. PubMed ID: 34010298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of partner beauty on opposite-sex attractiveness judgments.
Little AC; Caldwell CA; Jones BC; DeBruine LM
Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Dec; 40(6):1119-27. PubMed ID: 21901646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection.
Li NP; Yong JC; Tov W; Sng O; Fletcher GJ; Valentine KA; Jiang YF; Balliet D
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Nov; 105(5):757-76. PubMed ID: 23915041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of gender, rape-supportive attitudes, and explicit instruction on perceptions of women's momentary sexual interest.
Treat TA; Church EK; Viken RJ
Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):979-986. PubMed ID: 27753046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating self and partner physical attractiveness.
Swami V; Furnham A; Georgiades C; Pang L
Body Image; 2007 Mar; 4(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 18089256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of manipulated prestige-car ownership on both sex attractiveness ratings.
Dunn MJ; Searle R
Br J Psychol; 2010 Feb; 101(Pt 1):69-80. PubMed ID: 19302732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Individual differences in valuing mates' physical attractiveness.
Mathes EW; Bielser A; Cassell T; Summers S; Witowski A
Psychol Rep; 2006 Oct; 99(2):502-11. PubMed ID: 17153821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
