134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2673152)
1. Molecular dosimetry of genotoxic damage.
Baan RA; Fichtinger-Schepman AM; Roza L; van der Schans GP
Arch Toxicol Suppl; 1989; 13():66-82. PubMed ID: 2673152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Single cell gel electrophoresis assay in the earthworm for the detection of genotoxic compounds in soils.
Verschaeve L; Gilles J
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 1995 Jan; 54(1):112-9. PubMed ID: 7756773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. International Commission for Protection Against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. The subtlety of alkylating agents in reactions with biological macromolecules.
Vogel EW; Nivard MJ
Mutat Res; 1994 Feb; 305(1):13-32. PubMed ID: 7508544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Studies on the potential for genotoxic carcinogenicity of fragrances and other chemicals.
Rosenkranz HS; Zhang YP; Klopman G
Food Chem Toxicol; 1998 Aug; 36(8):687-96. PubMed ID: 9734719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Molecular dosimetry of chemical mutagens. Relationship between DNA adduct formation and genetic changes analyzed at the molecular level.
van Zeeland AA
Mutat Res; 1996 Jun; 353(1-2):123-50. PubMed ID: 8692189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Frontier orbital energies, hydrophobicity and steric factors as physical QSAR descriptors of molecular mutagenicity. A review with a case study: MX compounds.
Tuppurainen K
Chemosphere; 1999 Jun; 38(13):3015-30. PubMed ID: 10230045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of short-term tests for the detection of genotoxic activity in body fluids and excreta.
Venitt S
Mutat Res; 1988; 205(1-4):331-53. PubMed ID: 3285194
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of co-exposure to extremely low frequency (50 Hz) magnetic fields and xenobiotics determined in vitro by the alkaline comet assay.
Villarini M; Moretti M; Scassellati-Sforzolini G; Boccioli B; Pasquini R
Sci Total Environ; 2006 May; 361(1-3):208-19. PubMed ID: 15979690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of Styrax camporum and of Chemical Markers (Egonol and Homoegonol) on DNA Damage Induced by Mutagens with Different Mechanisms of Action.
de Oliveira PF; Damasceno JL; Nicolella HD; Bertanha CS; Pauletti PM; Tavares DC
Biol Pharm Bull; 2016; 39(11):1839-1845. PubMed ID: 27803455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bioluminescence test for genotoxic agents.
Ulitzur S
Methods Enzymol; 1986; 133():264-74. PubMed ID: 3821539
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Structures of fecapentaenes, the mutagens of bacterial origin isolated from human feces.
Gupta I; Baptista J; Bruce WR; Che CT; Furrer R; Gingerich JS; Grey AA; Marai L; Yates P; Krepinsky JJ
Biochemistry; 1983 Jan; 22(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 6824628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of genotoxic components in diesel engine emissions.
Hsieh LL; Wong D; Heisig V; Santella RM; Mauderly JL; Mitchell CE; Wolff RK; Jeffrey AM
Dev Toxicol Environ Sci; 1986; 13():223-32. PubMed ID: 2435489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. International Commission for Protection Against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. Oxidative DNA damage--the effects of certain genotoxic and operationally non-genotoxic carcinogens.
Clayson DB; Mehta R; Iverson F
Mutat Res; 1994 Feb; 317(1):25-42. PubMed ID: 7507571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genotoxic effect of exposure to metal(loid)s. A molecular epidemiology survey of populations living and working in Panasqueira mine area, Portugal.
Coelho P; García-Lestón J; Costa S; Costa C; Silva S; Dall'Armi V; Zoffoli R; Bonassi S; de Lima JP; Gaspar JF; Pásaro E; Laffon B; Teixeira JP
Environ Int; 2013 Oct; 60():163-70. PubMed ID: 24036326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Using method of DNA microelectrophoresis for the assessment of genotoxic effects of mutagens in cultured human hemopoietic cells].
Chernenko VIu; Lukash LL; Matsevich LL; Kochubeĭ TP; Elesichev AA; Klimenko EA; Gorban' LN
Tsitol Genet; 2004; 38(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 15098445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genotoxic chemical carcinogens target inducible genes in vivo.
Hamilton JW; McCaffrey J; Caron RM; Louis CA; Treadwell MD; Hunt SR; Reed MJ; Doherty KA
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1994 Jul; 726():343-5. PubMed ID: 8092700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk assessment of genotoxic mutagens with thresholds: a brief introduction.
Kirsch-Volders M; Gonzalez L; Carmichael P; Kirkland D
Mutat Res; 2009 Aug; 678(2):72-5. PubMed ID: 19442759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [DNA modification and carcinogenesis--early events caused by a heterocyclic aromatic amine, Glu-P-1].
Shudo K; Hashimoto Y
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1989 Mar; 16(3 Pt 2):445-50. PubMed ID: 2650626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Overall impact of the regulatory requirements for genotoxic impurities on the drug development process.
Giordani A; Kobel W; Gally HU
Eur J Pharm Sci; 2011 May; 43(1-2):1-15. PubMed ID: 21420491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The potential of 1,1'-hexamethylenebis [3-(3,5-dichloro-4-pyridyl)] urea to modify genotoxic actions of chemical mutagens in various test-systems].
Chankova SG; Ionova PA; Gateva SP; Iovchev G; Stergios ML; Mekhandzhiev AD; Shevchenko VA
Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2006; 46(4):410-4. PubMed ID: 17020088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
