These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26731709)

  • 1. Relevant Anatomic and Morphological Measurements of the Rat Spine: Considerations for Rodent Models of Human Spine Trauma.
    Jaumard NV; Leung J; Gokhale AJ; Guarino BB; Welch WC; Winkelstein BA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Oct; 40(20):E1084-92. PubMed ID: 26731709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Cervical Spine Anatomy in Calves, Pigs and Humans.
    Sheng SR; Xu HZ; Wang YL; Zhu QA; Mao FM; Lin Y; Wang XY
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148610. PubMed ID: 26866593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of spine morphology on intervertebral disc loads and stresses in asymptomatic adults: implications for the ideal spine.
    Keller TS; Colloca CJ; Harrison DE; Harrison DD; Janik TJ
    Spine J; 2005; 5(3):297-309. PubMed ID: 15863086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Young investigator award winner: validation of the mouse and rat disc as mechanical models of the human lumbar disc.
    Elliott DM; Sarver JJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Apr; 29(7):713-22. PubMed ID: 15087791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Congenital lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective, control-matched, cohort radiographic analysis.
    Singh K; Samartzis D; Vaccaro AR; Nassr A; Andersson GB; Yoon ST; Phillips FM; Goldberg EJ; An HS
    Spine J; 2005; 5(6):615-22. PubMed ID: 16291100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anatomy of the sheep spine and its comparison to the human spine.
    Wilke HJ; Kettler A; Wenger KH; Claes LE
    Anat Rec; 1997 Apr; 247(4):542-55. PubMed ID: 9096794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of advanced age on the morphometry and degenerative state of the cervical spine in a rat model.
    Laing AC; Cox R; Tetzlaff W; Oxland T
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2011 Aug; 294(8):1326-36. PubMed ID: 21714115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Disc spaces, vertebral dimensions, and angle values at the lumbar region: a radioanatomical perspective in spines with L5-S1 transitions: clinical article.
    Mahato NK
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Oct; 15(4):371-9. PubMed ID: 21740126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative anatomical dimensions of the complete human and porcine spine.
    Busscher I; Ploegmakers JJ; Verkerke GJ; Veldhuizen AG
    Eur Spine J; 2010 Jul; 19(7):1104-14. PubMed ID: 20186441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative morphometry of L4 vertebrae: comparison of large animal models for the human lumbar spine.
    McLain RF; Yerby SA; Moseley TA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Apr; 27(8):E200-6. PubMed ID: 11935119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Thoracic spine morphology of a pseudo-biped animal model (kangaroo) and comparisons with human and quadruped animals.
    Balasubramanian S; Peters JR; Robinson LF; Singh A; Kent RW
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Dec; 25(12):4140-4154. PubMed ID: 27704284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Anatomical background of low back pain: variability and degeneration of the lumbar spinal canal and intervertebral disc].
    van Roy P; Barbaix E; Clarijs JP; Mense S
    Schmerz; 2001 Dec; 15(6):418-24. PubMed ID: 11793145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Test-retest repeatability of lumbar sagittal alignment and disc height measurements with or without axial loading: a computed tomography study.
    Hioki A; Miyamoto K; Shimizu K; Inoue N
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Apr; 24(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 21430497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The biomechanics of spinal injuries.
    Sances A; Myklebust JB; Maiman DJ; Larson SJ; Cusick JF; Jodat RW
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1984; 11(1):1-76. PubMed ID: 6373138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anatomy of large animal spines and its comparison to the human spine: a systematic review.
    Sheng SR; Wang XY; Xu HZ; Zhu GQ; Zhou YF
    Eur Spine J; 2010 Jan; 19(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 19876658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham BW; Hayes V; Sidiqi F; Dabbah M; Sefter JC; Hu N; Beatson H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19 Suppl):S152-60. PubMed ID: 16946633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of animals used in disc research to human lumbar disc geometry.
    O'Connell GD; Vresilovic EJ; Elliott DM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Feb; 32(3):328-33. PubMed ID: 17268264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Midlumbar lateral flexion stability measured in healthy volunteers by in vivo fluoroscopy.
    Mellor FE; Muggleton JM; Bagust J; Mason W; Thomas PW; Breen AC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):E811-7. PubMed ID: 19829245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A rat osteoporotic spine model for the evaluation of bioresorbable bone cements.
    Wang ML; Massie J; Perry A; Garfin SR; Kim CW
    Spine J; 2007; 7(4):466-74. PubMed ID: 17630145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vertebral endplate and disc changes in the aging sand rat lumbar spine: cross-sectional analyses of a large male and female population.
    Gruber HE; Gordon B; Williams C; Norton HJ; Hanley EN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(23):2529-36. PubMed ID: 17978650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.