These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26731853)

  • 1. [Instructions for aggregated evidence: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses (part 1)].
    Schindler B; Briel M; Günther J
    Med Monatsschr Pharm; 2015 Sep; 38(9):350-7. PubMed ID: 26731853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.
    Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L
    J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Instructions for aggregated evidence: About reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses (part 2)].
    Günther J; Briel M; Schindler B
    Med Monatsschr Pharm; 2015 Oct; 38(10):401-8. PubMed ID: 26731858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. "Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews in radiation oncology: A systematic review".
    Hasan H; Muhammed T; Yu J; Taguchi K; Samargandi OA; Howard AF; Lo AC; Olson R; Goddard K
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2017 Oct; 50(Pt A):141-149. PubMed ID: 28915472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A critical appraisal of the methodology and quality of evidence of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traditional Chinese medical nursing interventions: a systematic review of reviews.
    Jin YH; Wang GH; Sun YR; Li Q; Zhao C; Li G; Si JH; Li Y; Lu C; Shang HC
    BMJ Open; 2016 Nov; 6(11):e011514. PubMed ID: 28186925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meta-analyses: what they can and cannot do.
    Nordmann AJ; Kasenda B; Briel M
    Swiss Med Wkly; 2012; 142():w13518. PubMed ID: 22407741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: when they are useful and when to be careful.
    Noordzij M; Hooft L; Dekker FW; Zoccali C; Jager KJ
    Kidney Int; 2009 Dec; 76(11):1130-6. PubMed ID: 19727062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: studies of studies.
    Engberg S
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2008; 35(3):258-65. PubMed ID: 18496080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Primer: strengths and weaknesses of meta-analysis.
    Finckh A; Tramèr MR
    Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol; 2008 Mar; 4(3):146-52. PubMed ID: 18227829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How to use a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
    Tseng TY; Dahm P; Poolman RW; Preminger GM; Canales BJ; Montori VM
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1249-56. PubMed ID: 18707741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Systematic reviews and meta-analysis in laboratory medicine: principles and methods].
    Watine J
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2004; 62(6):611-27. PubMed ID: 15563420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methodological issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies in orthopaedic research.
    Simunovic N; Sprague S; Bhandari M
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 May; 91 Suppl 3():87-94. PubMed ID: 19411505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The application of knowledge synthesis methods in agri-food public health: recent advancements, challenges and opportunities.
    Young I; Waddell L; Sanchez J; Wilhelm B; McEwen SA; Rajić A
    Prev Vet Med; 2014 Mar; 113(4):339-55. PubMed ID: 24485274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Montori VM; Swiontkowski MF; Cook DJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Aug; (413):43-54. PubMed ID: 12897595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematic Reviews in Sports Medicine.
    DiSilvestro KJ; Tjoumakaris FP; Maltenfort MG; Spindler KP; Freedman KB
    Am J Sports Med; 2016 Feb; 44(2):533-8. PubMed ID: 25899433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Types of clinical studies. Systematic reviews.
    Varandas T; Carneiro AV
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2006 Feb; 25(2):233-46. PubMed ID: 16673653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
    Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What is Wrong With Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: If You Want the Right Answer, Ask the Right Question!
    Thoma A; Eaves FF
    Aesthet Surg J; 2016 Nov; 36(10):1198-1201. PubMed ID: 27756743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.