152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26732319)
21. State-Mandated (Mis)Information and Women's Endorsement of Common Abortion Myths.
Berglas NF; Gould H; Turok DK; Sanders JN; Perrucci AC; Roberts SC
Womens Health Issues; 2017; 27(2):129-135. PubMed ID: 28131389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Knowledge of state-level abortion laws and policies among front-line staff at facilities providing abortion services.
Dodge LE; Haider S; Hacker MR
Womens Health Issues; 2012 Sep; 22(5):e415-20. PubMed ID: 22944899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Abortion and compelled physician speech.
Orentlicher D
J Law Med Ethics; 2015; 43(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 25846035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Overview.
Alan Guttmacher Institute AGI
State Reprod Health Monit; 1993 Feb; 4(1):i-. PubMed ID: 12344861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Knowledge of state-level abortion laws and regulations among reproductive health care providers.
Dodge LE; Haider S; Hacker MR
Womens Health Issues; 2013; 23(5):e281-6. PubMed ID: 23910426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Legislation on contraception and abortion for adolescents.
Roemer R
Stud Fam Plann; 1985; 16(5):241-51. PubMed ID: 4060209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Bare court majority reaffirms Roe, but standard for reviewing state laws is relaxed.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Jul; (11):1-3. PubMed ID: 12286280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Justice Blackmun and the good physician: patients, populations, and the paradox of medicine.
Alpers A
Hastings Constit Law Q; 1998; 26(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 12666686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The Supreme Court, liberty, and abortion.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 1992 Aug; 327(9):651-4. PubMed ID: 1640971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Casey meets the crisis pregnancy centers.
Hill BJ
J Law Med Ethics; 2015; 43(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 25846039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. New abortion laws introduce informed and parental consent.
Family Plan World; 1991; 1(2):25. PubMed ID: 12284517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Overview.
Alan Guttmacher Institute AGI
State Reprod Health Monit; 1992 Dec; 3(4):i-. PubMed ID: 12317963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Casey, Bray and beyond: religious liberty and the abortion debate.
Simmons PD
St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):467-88. PubMed ID: 11656618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Abortion rights after South Dakota.
McDonagh E
Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Supreme Court preserves right to abortion, but allows restrictions. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
Swisher KN; Berriman GS
J Healthc Risk Manag; 1992; 12(4):50-2. PubMed ID: 10183733
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The first amendment and physician speech in reproductive decision making.
Suter SM
J Law Med Ethics; 2015; 43(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 25846036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prohibiting consent: what are the costs of denying permanent contraception concurrent with abortion care?
Krashin JW; Edelman AB; Nichols MD; Allen AJ; Caughey AB; Rodriguez MI
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 211(1):76.e1-76.e10. PubMed ID: 24799310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Air Force women's access to abortion services and the erosion of 10 U.S.C., section 1093.
Wilde ML
William Mary J Women Law; 2003; 9(3):351-412. PubMed ID: 15977327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
Peterfy A
J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Act No. 64 of 1989, 17 November 1989.
United States. Pennsylvania
Annu Rev Popul Law; 1989; 16():45, 324-33. PubMed ID: 12344427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
