These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26732319)

  • 41. Reproductive choices and informed consent: fetal interests, women's identity, and relational autonomy.
    Laufer-Ukeles P
    Am J Law Med; 2011; 37(4):567-623. PubMed ID: 22292213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Legal issues in the provision of medical abortion.
    Borgmann CE; Jones BS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Aug; 183(2 Suppl):S84-94. PubMed ID: 10944373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court.
    Bertz RC
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Public Law No. 262, 25 March 1988.
    United States. Pennsylvania
    Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():51, 336-48. PubMed ID: 12289591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues.
    Bryant MD
    Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Respecting women's rights and fetal value: reflections on the question of fetal anesthesia.
    Catholics for a Free Choice
    Conscience; 2005; 26(3):39-40. PubMed ID: 16604733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Federal court holds first live evidentiary hearing on mandatory delay since Casey.
    Reprod Freedom News; 1994 Jun; 3(12):2-3. PubMed ID: 12345510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Defining minors' abortion rights.
    Rhodes AM
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1988; 13(5):321. PubMed ID: 3139955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Beyond consent to sterilization: facing up to the full range of barriers to post-abortion contraception.
    Sonfield A; Gold RB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 211(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 24972529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Court gets stark arguments on abortion.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Apr; ():A1, B10-11. PubMed ID: 11646254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: constitutional principles and political turbulence.
    Bigel AI
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1993; 18(3):733-62. PubMed ID: 11659777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The impact of Mississippi's mandatory delay law on the timing of abortion.
    Joyce T; Kaestner R
    Fam Plann Perspect; 2000; 32(1):4-13. PubMed ID: 10710701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The summer of our discontent.
    O'Connor J
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(5):28-9. PubMed ID: 1428832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Fetal pain legislation: is it viable?
    Collett TS
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 2003 Jan; 30(2):161-84. PubMed ID: 15237508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. U.S. abortion policy since Roe v. Wade.
    Mcfarlane DR
    Am J Gynecol Health; 1993; 7(4):98-106. PubMed ID: 12288251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Abortion legislation after Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: model statutes and commentaries.
    Smolin DM
    Cumberland Law Rev; 1989-1990; 20(1):71-163. PubMed ID: 15999438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Woman's Right to Know Act: a legislative history.
    Stam P
    Issues Law Med; 2012; 28(1):3-67. PubMed ID: 22953381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Workability of the undue burden test.
    Schneider EA
    Temple Law Rev; 1993; 66(3):1003-37. PubMed ID: 11659882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: the reaffirmation of Roe or the beginning of the end?
    Henry KS
    Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1993-1994 Winter; 32(1):93-113. PubMed ID: 11660011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Does The Danish Health Act discriminate by requiring special consent for induced abortion, sterilization and fertility treatment?].
    Wøjdemann KR; Kesmodel US
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2016 May; 178(20):. PubMed ID: 27189102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.