These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26732319)

  • 61. Easing abortion's pain: the new fight to help the unborn.
    Kolenc AB
    America (NY); 2005 Sep; 193(8):18-21. PubMed ID: 16302322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Abortion in adolescents: epidemiology, confidentiality, and methods.
    Davis AR; Beasley AD
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 21(5):390-5. PubMed ID: 19623068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Double roadblock to reproductive rights.
    Farmer A
    Reprod Freedom News; 2000 May; 9(5):4-5. PubMed ID: 12349609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Abortion and informed consent.
    Kapp MB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Mar; 145(5):644. PubMed ID: 6829645
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Over two-thirds of fertility-related state laws enacted in 1979 regulate abortion.
    Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1980 Feb; 9(1):15-6. PubMed ID: 12278415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. High court hears clinic blockade case, as appeals court upholds abortion law.
    Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1991 Oct; (17):2-3. PubMed ID: 12284473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Distinctions in Disclosure: Mandated Informed Consent in Abortion and ART.
    Daar J
    J Law Med Ethics; 2015; 43(2):255-8. PubMed ID: 26242946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Abortion laws may compromise transparency and accountability.
    Bhattacharya D
    Contraception; 2009 Nov; 80(5):493-4. PubMed ID: 19835727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Implementing a prospective study of women seeking abortion in the United States: understanding and overcoming barriers to recruitment.
    Dobkin LM; Gould H; Barar RE; Ferrari M; Weiss EI; Foster DG
    Womens Health Issues; 2014; 24(1):e115-23. PubMed ID: 24439937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Privacy II: state attempts to regulate abortion.
    Prall S
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):385-427. PubMed ID: 11652657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Supreme Court refuses South Dakota appeal in parental notice case.
    Reprod Freedom News; 1996 May; 5(9):2. PubMed ID: 12291324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. What women want from abortion counseling in the United States: a qualitative study of abortion patients in 2008.
    Moore AM; Frohwirth L; Blades N
    Soc Work Health Care; 2011; 50(6):424-42. PubMed ID: 21774585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. When states regulate emergency contraceptives like abortion, what should guide disclosure?
    Flynn CO; Wilson RF
    J Law Med Ethics; 2015; 43(1):72-86. PubMed ID: 25846040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Characteristics of patients having telemedicine versus in-person informed consent visits before abortion in Utah.
    Daniel S; Raifman S; Kaller S; Grossman D
    Contraception; 2020 Jan; 101(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 31493381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Consent for trainee participation in abortion care: A qualitative study of patient experiences and preferences in the United States.
    Crystal-Ornelas L; Sarnaik S; Dianat S; Dehlendorf C; Holt K
    Contraception; 2023 May; 121():109974. PubMed ID: 36758737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Rose Acuna v. Sheldon C. Turkish, M.D.
    Issues Law Med; 2003; 19(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 12926404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Quantifying the impact of targeted regulation of abortion provider laws on US abortion rates: a multi-state assessment.
    Austin N; Harper S
    Contraception; 2019 Nov; 100(5):374-379. PubMed ID: 31202816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Abortion decisions and the duty to screen: clinical, ethical, and legal implications of predictive risk factors of post-abortion maladjustment.
    Reardon DC
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2003; 20(1):33-114. PubMed ID: 15067928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Can Requiring a Woman to Obtain the Consent of the Father before Receiving an Abortion Really Be Constitutional? Brief Answer: No.
    Ozment VA
    J Leg Med; 2017; 37(3-4):559-578. PubMed ID: 29473808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Constructing a longitudinal database of targeted regulation of abortion providers laws.
    Austin N; Harper S
    Health Serv Res; 2019 Oct; 54(5):1084-1089. PubMed ID: 31206632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.