120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26733349)
1. A review of biomechanically informed breast image registration.
Hipwell JH; Vavourakis V; Han L; Mertzanidou T; Eiben B; Hawkes DJ
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jan; 61(2):R1-31. PubMed ID: 26733349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast lesion co-localisation between X-ray and MR images using finite element modelling.
Lee AW; Rajagopal V; Babarenda Gamage TP; Doyle AJ; Nielsen PM; Nash MP
Med Image Anal; 2013 Dec; 17(8):1256-64. PubMed ID: 23860392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A complete software application for automatic registration of x-ray mammography and magnetic resonance images.
Solves-Llorens JA; Rupérez MJ; Monserrat C; Feliu E; García M; Lloret M
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081903. PubMed ID: 25086534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automatic multimodal 2D/3D breast image registration using biomechanical FEM models and intensity-based optimization.
Hopp T; Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Kreisel P; Kaiser WA; Gemmeke H; Ruiter NV
Med Image Anal; 2013 Feb; 17(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 23265802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modeling breast biomechanics for multi-modal image analysis--successes and challenges.
Rajagopal V; Nielsen PMF; Nash MP
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med; 2010; 2(3):293-304. PubMed ID: 20836030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Symmetric Biomechanically Guided Prone-to-Supine Breast Image Registration.
Eiben B; Vavourakis V; Hipwell JH; Kabus S; Buelow T; Lorenz C; Mertzanidou T; Reis S; Williams NR; Keshtgar M; Hawkes DJ
Ann Biomed Eng; 2016 Jan; 44(1):154-73. PubMed ID: 26577254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast image analysis for risk assessment, detection, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer.
Giger ML; Karssemeijer N; Schnabel JA
Annu Rev Biomed Eng; 2013; 15():327-57. PubMed ID: 23683087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fully Automated Quantitative Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density from Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images: Preliminary Results and Comparison with Digital Mammography and MR Imaging.
Pertuz S; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Conant EF; Kontos D
Radiology; 2016 Apr; 279(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 26491909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Realization of a biomechanical model-assisted image guidance system for breast cancer surgery using supine MRI.
Conley RH; Meszoely IM; Weis JA; Pheiffer TS; Arlinghaus LR; Yankeelov TE; Miga MI
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Dec; 10(12):1985-96. PubMed ID: 26092657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of nonrigid image registration using finite-element methods: application to breast MR images.
Schnabel JA; Tanner C; Castellano-Smith AD; Degenhard A; Leach MO; Hose DR; Hill DL; Hawkes DJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Feb; 22(2):238-47. PubMed ID: 12716000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Deformable mapping technique to correlate lesions in digital breast tomosynthesis and automated breast ultrasound images.
Green CA; Goodsitt MM; Brock KK; Davis CL; Larson ED; Lau JH; Carson PL
Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4402-4417. PubMed ID: 30066340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging.
Gong X; Glick SJ; Liu B; Vedula AA; Thacker S
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1041-52. PubMed ID: 16696481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MRI to X-ray mammography registration using a volume-preserving affine transformation.
Mertzanidou T; Hipwell J; Cardoso MJ; Zhang X; Tanner C; Ourselin S; Bick U; Huisman H; Karssemeijer N; Hawkes D
Med Image Anal; 2012 Jul; 16(5):966-75. PubMed ID: 22513136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative evaluation of free-form deformation registration for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
Tanner C; Schnabel JA; Hill DL; Hawkes DJ; Degenhard A; Leach MO; Hose DR; Hall-Craggs MA; Usiskin SI
Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1221-33. PubMed ID: 17500454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast image registration and deformation modeling.
Boehler T; Zoehrer F; Harz M; Hahn HK
Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 2012; 40(3):235-58. PubMed ID: 22694202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tomosynthesis-detected Architectural Distortion: Management Algorithm with Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation.
Durand MA; Wang S; Hooley RJ; Raghu M; Philpotts LE
Radiographics; 2016; 36(2):311-21. PubMed ID: 26963448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phantom validation of coregistration of PET and CT for image-guided radiotherapy.
Lavely WC; Scarfone C; Cevikalp H; Li R; Byrne DW; Cmelak AJ; Dawant B; Price RR; Hallahan DE; Fitzpatrick JM
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1083-92. PubMed ID: 15191296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors influencing the accuracy of biomechanical breast models.
Tanner C; Schnabel JA; Hill DL; Hawkes DJ; Leach MO; Hose DR
Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1758-69. PubMed ID: 16872083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recent advances in breast-specific imaging.
Berman CG
Cancer Control; 2007 Oct; 14(4):338-49. PubMed ID: 17914334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
