These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26733349)

  • 21. Current status of digital mammography for screening and diagnosis of breast cancer.
    Van Ongeval C; Bosmans H; Van Steen A
    Curr Opin Oncol; 2006 Nov; 18(6):547-54. PubMed ID: 16988574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Digital mammography for screening and diagnosis of breast cancer: an overview.
    Van Ongeval Ch
    JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(3):163-6. PubMed ID: 17696081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Imaging: How Does It Fit into Preoperative Evaluation and Surveillance?
    Eghtedari M; Tsai C; Robles J; Blair SL; Ojeda-Fournier H
    Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2018 Jan; 27(1):33-49. PubMed ID: 29132564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluating an optical-flow-based registration algorithm for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast.
    Martel AL; Froh MS; Brock KK; Plewes DB; Barber DC
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3803-16. PubMed ID: 17664578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Narrow band deformable registration of prostate magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, and computed tomography studies.
    Schreibmann E; Xing L
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jun; 62(2):595-605. PubMed ID: 15890605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Breast MRI, digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis: comparison of three methods for early detection of breast cancer.
    Roganovic D; Djilas D; Vujnovic S; Pavic D; Stojanov D
    Bosn J Basic Med Sci; 2015 Nov; 15(4):64-8. PubMed ID: 26614855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Computer-aided detection/diagnosis of breast cancer in mammography and ultrasound: a review.
    Jalalian A; Mashohor SB; Mahmud HR; Saripan MI; Ramli AR; Karasfi B
    Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(3):420-6. PubMed ID: 23153689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Towards a more realistic biomechanical modelling of breast malignant tumours.
    Wessel C; Schnabel JA; Brady M
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Feb; 57(3):631-48. PubMed ID: 22241544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A GPU based high-resolution multilevel biomechanical head and neck model for validating deformable image registration.
    Neylon J; Qi X; Sheng K; Staton R; Pukala J; Manon R; Low DA; Kupelian P; Santhanam A
    Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):232-43. PubMed ID: 25563263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Validation of biomechanical deformable image registration in the abdomen, thorax, and pelvis in a commercial radiotherapy treatment planning system.
    Velec M; Moseley JL; Svensson S; Hårdemark B; Jaffray DA; Brock KK
    Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3407-3417. PubMed ID: 28453911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A 3D global-to-local deformable mesh model based registration and anatomy-constrained segmentation method for image guided prostate radiotherapy.
    Zhou J; Kim S; Jabbour S; Goyal S; Haffty B; Chen T; Levinson L; Metaxas D; Yue NJ
    Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1298-308. PubMed ID: 20384267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [New trends and novel possibilities in the diagnostic imaging of breast cancer].
    Bidlek M; Kovács E; Fehér K; Gõdény M
    Magy Onkol; 2015 Mar; 59(1):44-55. PubMed ID: 25763913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. 3D breast image registration--a review.
    Sivaramakrishna R
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2005 Feb; 4(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 15649086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Computed-aided diagnosis (CAD) in the detection of breast cancer.
    Dromain C; Boyer B; Ferré R; Canale S; Delaloge S; Balleyguier C
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Mar; 82(3):417-23. PubMed ID: 22939365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Addition of tomosynthesis to conventional digital mammography: effect on image interpretation time of screening examinations.
    Dang PA; Freer PE; Humphrey KL; Halpern EF; Rafferty EA
    Radiology; 2014 Jan; 270(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 24354377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Non-rigid registration of a 3D ultrasound and a MR image data set of the female pelvic floor using a biomechanical model.
    Verhey JF; Wisser J; Warfield SK; Rexilius J; Kikinis R
    Biomed Eng Online; 2005 Mar; 4():19. PubMed ID: 15777475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Two-view and single-view tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: high-resolution X-ray imaging observer study.
    Wallis MG; Moa E; Zanca F; Leifland K; Danielsson M
    Radiology; 2012 Mar; 262(3):788-96. PubMed ID: 22274840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fusion of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography at 3.0T with X-ray mammograms: pilot study evaluation using dedicated semi-automatic registration software.
    Dietzel M; Hopp T; Ruiter N; Zoubi R; Runnebaum IB; Kaiser WA; Baltzer PA
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Aug; 79(2):e98-e102. PubMed ID: 21570793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Site-specific deformable imaging registration algorithm selection using patient-based simulated deformations.
    Nie K; Chuang C; Kirby N; Braunstein S; Pouliot J
    Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041911. PubMed ID: 23556905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Stereotactic mammography imaging combined with 3D US imaging for image guided breast biopsy.
    Surry KJ; Mills GR; Bevan K; Downey DB; Fenster A
    Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4348-58. PubMed ID: 18072500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.