212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26734113)
1. Roughness Analysis on Composite Materials (Microfilled, Nanofilled and Silorane) After Different Finishing and Polishing Procedures.
Pettini F; Corsalini M; Savino MG; Stefanachi G; Di Venere D; Pappalettere C; Monno G; Boccaccio A
Open Dent J; 2015; 9():357-67. PubMed ID: 26734113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials.
Attar N
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 17211502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of toothbrushing on surface characteristics of microhybrid and nanofilled resin composites following different finishing and polishing procedures.
Daud A; Adams AJ; Shawkat A; Gray G; Wilson NHF; Lynch CD; Blum IR
J Dent; 2020 Aug; 99():103376. PubMed ID: 32470566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of microfilled, hybrid and packable composite resins.
Barbosa SH; Zanata RL; Navarro MF; Nunes OB
Braz Dent J; 2005; 16(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 16113932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of the different finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of three different posterior composite resins.
Sahbaz C; Bahsi E; Ince B; Bakir EP; Cellik O
Scanning; 2016 Sep; 38(5):448-454. PubMed ID: 26752718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the Effect of Surface Polishing, Oral Beverages and Food Colorants on Color Stability and Surface Roughness of Nanocomposite Resins.
Kumari RV; Nagaraj H; Siddaraju K; Poluri RK
J Int Oral Health; 2015 Jul; 7(7):63-70. PubMed ID: 26229373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of different finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of different composite restorative materials.
Uçtaşli MB; Arisu HD; Omürlü H; Eligüzeloğlu E; Ozcan S; Ergun G
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 17277831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness of Resin Composite and Enamel: An
Bansal K; Gupta S; Nikhil V; Jaiswal S; Jain A; Aggarwal N
Int J Appl Basic Med Res; 2019; 9(3):154-158. PubMed ID: 31392178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomised controlled study on the use of finishing and polishing systems on different resin composites using 3D contact optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy.
Daud A; Gray G; Lynch CD; Wilson NHF; Blum IR
J Dent; 2018 Apr; 71():25-30. PubMed ID: 29360492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro evaluation of the effect of different polishing techniques on the surface roughness of composite resins submitted to at-home and in-office bleaching procedures.
de Oliveira Lima M; Catelan A; Hernandes NM; Giorgi MC; Ambrosano GM; Lima DA
J Conserv Dent; 2015; 18(6):483-7. PubMed ID: 26752845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surface texture of four nanofilled and one hybrid composite after finishing.
Jung M; Sehr K; Klimek J
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 17288328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surface roughness and microhardness evaluation of composite resin restorations subjected to three different polishing systems immediately and after 24 h: An
Chowdhury D; Mukherjee S; Maity I; Mazumdar P
J Conserv Dent Endod; 2023; 26(6):639-645. PubMed ID: 38292743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of four different finishing and polishing systems on resin composites: roughness surface and gloss retention evaluations.
Tosco V; Monterubbianesi R; Orilisi G; Procaccini M; Grandini S; Putignano A; Orsini G
Minerva Stomatol; 2020 Aug; 69(4):207-214. PubMed ID: 31633320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Techniques on the Surface Roughness and the Color of Nanocomposite Resin Restorative Materials.
Avsar A; Yuzbasioglu E; Sarac D
Adv Clin Exp Med; 2015; 24(5):881-90. PubMed ID: 26768641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of surface roughness of glass-ionomer cements and compomer.
Pedrini D; Candido MS; Rodrigues AL
J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Jul; 30(7):714-9. PubMed ID: 12791157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surface geometry of four nanofiller and one hybrid composite after one-step and multiple-step polishing.
Jung M; Eichelberger K; Klimek J
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(4):347-55. PubMed ID: 17695607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conventional polishing techniques versus a nanofilled surface sealer: preliminary findings regarding surface roughness changes and analysis.
Jefferies SR; Boston DW
J Clin Dent; 2010; 21(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 20527508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of finishing/polishing techniques and time on surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials.
Madhyastha PS; Hegde S; Srikant N; Kotian R; Iyer SS
Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2017; 14(5):326-330. PubMed ID: 29109747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of different polishing systems and speeds on the surface roughness of resin composites.
Tepe H; Erdılek AD; Sahın M; Efes BG; Yaman BC
J Conserv Dent; 2023; 26(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 36908727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surface Roughness, Microhardness, and Microleakage of a Silorane-Based Composite Resin after Immediate or Delayed Finishing/Polishing.
Lins FC; Ferreira RC; Silveira RR; Pereira CN; Moreira AN; Magalhães CS
Int J Dent; 2016; 2016():8346782. PubMed ID: 26977150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
