These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26734511)

  • 1. Kelvin probe force microscopy for local characterisation of active nanoelectronic devices.
    Wagner T; Beyer H; Reissner P; Mensch P; Riel H; Gotsmann B; Stemmer A
    Beilstein J Nanotechnol; 2015; 6():2193-206. PubMed ID: 26734511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measurement of electrostatic tip-sample interactions by time-domain Kelvin probe force microscopy.
    Ritz C; Wagner T; Stemmer A
    Beilstein J Nanotechnol; 2020; 11():911-921. PubMed ID: 32596095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Force gradient sensitive detection in lift-mode Kelvin probe force microscopy.
    Ziegler D; Stemmer A
    Nanotechnology; 2011 Feb; 22(7):075501. PubMed ID: 21233549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High-speed digitization of the amplitude and frequency in open-loop sideband frequency-modulation Kelvin probe force microscopy.
    Stan G
    Nanotechnology; 2020 Jun; 31(38):385706. PubMed ID: 32516761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Open-loop amplitude-modulation Kelvin probe force microscopy operated in single-pass PeakForce tapping mode.
    Stan G; Namboodiri P
    Beilstein J Nanotechnol; 2021; 12():1115-1126. PubMed ID: 34703722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High resolution atomic force and Kelvin probe force microscopy image data of InAs(001) surface using frequency modulation method.
    Park YM; Park JS; Chung CH; Lee S
    Data Brief; 2020 Apr; 29():105177. PubMed ID: 32055662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Know your full potential: Quantitative Kelvin probe force microscopy on nanoscale electrical devices.
    Axt A; Hermes IM; Bergmann VW; Tausendpfund N; Weber SAL
    Beilstein J Nanotechnol; 2018; 9():1809-1819. PubMed ID: 29977714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The stray capacitance effect in Kelvin probe force microscopy using FM, AM and heterodyne AM modes.
    Ma ZM; Kou L; Naitoh Y; Li YJ; Sugawara Y
    Nanotechnology; 2013 Jun; 24(22):225701. PubMed ID: 23633495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Kelvin probe force microscopy in application to biomolecular films: frequency modulation, amplitude modulation, and lift mode.
    Moores B; Hane F; Eng L; Leonenko Z
    Ultramicroscopy; 2010 May; 110(6):708-11. PubMed ID: 20363077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Current and potential characterization on InAs nanowires by contact-mode atomic force microscopy and Kelvin probe force microscopy.
    On S; Takeuchi M; Takahashi T
    Ultramicroscopy; 2002 May; 91(1-4):127-32. PubMed ID: 12211460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Potential sensitivities in frequency modulation and heterodyne amplitude modulation Kelvin probe force microscopes.
    Ma ZM; Mu JL; Tang J; Xue H; Zhang H; Xue CY; Liu J; Li YJ
    Nanoscale Res Lett; 2013 Dec; 8(1):532. PubMed ID: 24350866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Note: Quantitative (artifact-free) surface potential measurements using Kelvin force microscopy.
    Mélin T; Barbet S; Diesinger H; Théron D; Deresmes D
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2011 Mar; 82(3):036101. PubMed ID: 21456803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tip-to-sample distance dependence of an electrostatic force in KFM measurements.
    Takahashi T; Ono S
    Ultramicroscopy; 2004 Aug; 100(3-4):287-92. PubMed ID: 15231321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preventing probe induced topography correlated artifacts in Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy.
    Polak L; Wijngaarden RJ
    Ultramicroscopy; 2016 Dec; 171():158-165. PubMed ID: 27690346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the relevance of the atomic-scale contact potential difference by amplitude-modulation and frequency-modulation Kelvin probe force microscopy.
    Nony L; Bocquet F; Loppacher C; Glatzel T
    Nanotechnology; 2009 Jul; 20(26):264014. PubMed ID: 19509441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Kelvin force microscopy at the second cantilever resonance: an out-of-vacuum crosstalk compensation setup.
    Diesinger H; Deresmes D; Nys JP; Mélin T
    Ultramicroscopy; 2008 Jul; 108(8):773-81. PubMed ID: 18342448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improvement of KFM performance by intermittent bias application method and by sampling detection of cantilever deflection.
    Takahashi T; Matsumoto T; Ono S
    Ultramicroscopy; 2009 Jul; 109(8):963-7. PubMed ID: 19345495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pulsed Force Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy.
    Jakob DS; Wang H; Xu XG
    ACS Nano; 2020 Apr; 14(4):4839-4848. PubMed ID: 32283008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative 3D-KPFM imaging with simultaneous electrostatic force and force gradient detection.
    Collins L; Okatan MB; Li Q; Kravenchenko II; Lavrik NV; Kalinin SV; Rodriguez BJ; Jesse S
    Nanotechnology; 2015 May; 26(17):175707. PubMed ID: 25851168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reconstruction of surface potential from Kelvin probe force microscopy images.
    Cohen G; Halpern E; Nanayakkara SU; Luther JM; Held C; Bennewitz R; Boag A; Rosenwaks Y
    Nanotechnology; 2013 Jul; 24(29):295702. PubMed ID: 23807266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.