354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26734678)
1. Evaluation of Microtensile Bond Strength and Microleakage of a Self-adhering Flowable Composite.
Yuan H; Li M; Guo B; Gao Y; Liu H; Li J
J Adhes Dent; 2015 Dec; 17(6):535-43. PubMed ID: 26734678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of elastic cavity wall and occlusal loading on microleakage and dentin bond strength.
Pongprueksa P; Kuphasuk W; Senawongse P
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):466-75. PubMed ID: 17910223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bonding and sealing ability of a new self-adhering flowable composite resin in class I restorations.
Vichi A; Margvelashvili M; Goracci C; Papacchini F; Ferrari M
Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jul; 17(6):1497-506. PubMed ID: 23086332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives.
Duarte S; de Freitas CR; Saad JR; Sadan A
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19573687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of occlusal loading on the microleakage of class V restorations.
Arisu HD; Uçtasli MB; Eligüzeloglu E; Ozcan S; Omürlü H
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 18435186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of 3-month Simulated Pulpal Pressure on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Simplified Resin Luting Systems.
Bacchi A; Abuna G; Babbar A; Sinhoreti MA; Feitosa VP
J Adhes Dent; 2015 Jun; 17(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 26159130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microtensile Bond Strength and Micromorphology of Bur-cut Enamel Using Five Adhesive Systems.
Vinagre A; Ramos J; Messias A; Marques F; Caramelo F; Mata A
J Adhes Dent; 2015 Apr; 17(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 25911962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. "No-bottle" vs "multi-bottle" dentin adhesives--a microtensile bond strength and morphological study.
Frankenberger R; Perdigão J; Rosa BT; Lopes M
Dent Mater; 2001 Sep; 17(5):373-80. PubMed ID: 11445203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation between degree of conversion, resin-dentin bond strength and nanoleakage of simplified etch-and-rinse adhesives.
Hass V; Dobrovolski M; Zander-Grande C; Martins GC; Gordillo LA; Rodrigues Accorinte Mde L; Gomes OM; Loguercio AD; Reis A
Dent Mater; 2013 Sep; 29(9):921-8. PubMed ID: 23830512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microtensile bond strength of adhesive systems to dentin with or without application of an intermediate flowable resin layer.
De Goes MF; Giannini M; Di Hipólito V; Carrilho MR; Daronch M; Rueggeberg FA
Braz Dent J; 2008; 19(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 18438560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of microleakage in cervical margins of various posterior restorative systems.
Bedran de Castro AK; Pimenta LA; Amaral CM; Ambrosano GM
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2002; 14(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 12008798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Two-year bond strengths of "all-in-one" adhesives to dentine.
Walter R; Swift EJ; Nagaoka H; Chung Y; Bartholomew W; Braswell KM; Pereira PN
J Dent; 2012 Jul; 40(7):549-55. PubMed ID: 22429926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Enamel-resin bond durability of self-etch and etch & rinse adhesives.
Osorio R; Monticelli F; Moreira MA; Osorio E; Toledano M
Am J Dent; 2009 Dec; 22(6):371-5. PubMed ID: 20178215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the influence of three different temperatures on microleakage of two self-etch and one total-etch adhesives.
Akbarian S; Sharafeddin F; Akbarian G
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Mar; 16(3):178-82. PubMed ID: 26057914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Shear bond strength of three different nano-restorative materials to dentin.
Korkmaz Y; Gurgan S; Firat E; Nathanson D
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 20166411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microleakage of Class II restorations and microtensile bond strength to dentin of low-shrinkage composites.
Juloski J; Carrabba M; Aragoneses JM; Forner L; Vichi A; Ferrari M
Am J Dent; 2013 Oct; 26(5):271-7. PubMed ID: 24479279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gingival microleakage of class V composite restorations with fiber inserts.
Ahmed W; El-Badrawy W; Kulkarni G; Prakki A; El-Mowafy O
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):622-8. PubMed ID: 24309339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
