These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26735594)

  • 21. On the Information Obtainable from Comparative Judgments.
    Bürkner PC
    Psychometrika; 2022 Dec; 87(4):1439-1472. PubMed ID: 35133553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A Multidimensional Item Response Theory Model for Continuous and Graded Responses With Error in Persons and Items.
    Ferrando PJ; Navarro-González D
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Dec; 81(6):1029-1053. PubMed ID: 34552274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The assessment of pain quality: an item response theory analysis.
    Waterman C; Victor TW; Jensen MP; Gould EM; Gammaitoni AR; Galer BS
    J Pain; 2010 Mar; 11(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 20211439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Factor Analytic Procedures for Assessing Social Desirability in Binary Items.
    Ferrando PJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2005; 40(3):331-49. PubMed ID: 26794687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Empirical Scenarios of Fake Data Analysis: The Sample Generation by Replacement (SGR) Approach.
    Pastore M; Nucci M; Bobbio A; Lombardi L
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():482. PubMed ID: 28469584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A test of the International Personality Item Pool representation of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory and development of a 120-item IPIP-based measure of the five-factor model.
    Maples JL; Guan L; Carter NT; Miller JD
    Psychol Assess; 2014 Dec; 26(4):1070-84. PubMed ID: 24932643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of positive impression management on the NEO Personality Inventory--Revised in a clinical population.
    Ballenger JF; Caldwell-Andrews A; Baer RA
    Psychol Assess; 2001 Jun; 13(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 11433800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An IRT Modeling Approach for Assessing Item and Person Discrimination in Binary Personality Responses.
    Ferrando PJ
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 May; 40(3):218-232. PubMed ID: 29881049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. To Fake or Not to Fake: Antecedents to Interview Faking, Warning Instructions, and Its Impact on Applicant Reactions.
    Law SJ; Bourdage J; O'Neill TA
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1771. PubMed ID: 27895609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Gender-based measurement invariance of the substance use risk profile scale.
    Memetovic J; Ratner PA; Richardson CG
    Addict Behav; 2014 Mar; 39(3):690-4. PubMed ID: 24296151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparing Simple Scoring With IRT Scoring of Personality Measures: The Navy Computer Adaptive Personality Scales.
    Oswald FL; Shaw A; Farmer WL
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Mar; 39(2):144-154. PubMed ID: 29880999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Exaggeration is harder than understatement, but practice makes perfect!
    Röhner J; Schröder-Abé M; Schütz A
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(6):464-72. PubMed ID: 21592941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Challenging response latencies in faking detection: The case of few items and no warnings.
    Röhner J; Holden RR
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Feb; 54(1):324-333. PubMed ID: 34173217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Individual differences in faking integrity tests.
    Brown RD; Cothern CM
    Psychol Rep; 2002 Dec; 91(3 Pt 1):691-702. PubMed ID: 12530710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Edinburgh Handedness Inventory - Short Form: a revised version based on confirmatory factor analysis.
    Veale JF
    Laterality; 2014; 19(2):164-77. PubMed ID: 23659650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparing Traditional and IRT Scoring of Forced-Choice Tests.
    Hontangas PM; de la Torre J; Ponsoda V; Leenen I; Morillo D; Abad FJ
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Nov; 39(8):598-612. PubMed ID: 29881030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An Approach to Scoring and Equating Tests With Binary Items: Piloting With Large-Scale Assessments.
    Dimitrov DM
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Dec; 76(6):954-975. PubMed ID: 29795895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21: measurement and structural invariance across ratings of men and women.
    Gomez R; Summers M; Summers A; Wolf A; Summers J
    Assessment; 2014 Aug; 21(4):418-26. PubMed ID: 24486523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessing meaningful within-person variability in Likert-scale rated personality descriptions: An IRT tree approach.
    Lang JWB; Lievens F; De Fruyt F; Zettler I; Tackett JL
    Psychol Assess; 2019 Apr; 31(4):474-487. PubMed ID: 30855158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Applying multilevel item response theory to vision-related quality of life in Dutch visually impaired elderly.
    van Nispen RM; Knol DL; Langelaan M; de Boer MR; Terwee CB; van Rens GH
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Aug; 84(8):710-20. PubMed ID: 17700335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.