121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26736287)
1. Anisotropic phantoms in Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Krzyzak A; Klodowski K; Raszewski Z
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():414-7. PubMed ID: 26736287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Innovative anisotropic phantoms for calibration of diffusion tensor imaging sequences.
Kłodowski K; Krzyżak AT
Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 May; 34(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 26707852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The b matrix calculation using the anisotropic phantoms for DWI and DTI experiments.
Krzyzak AT; Klodowski K
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():418-21. PubMed ID: 26736288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A theoretical validation of the B-matrix spatial distribution approach to diffusion tensor imaging.
Borkowski K; Kłodowski K; Figiel H; Krzyżak AT
Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Feb; 36():1-6. PubMed ID: 27742435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Theoretical analysis of phantom rotations in BSD-DTI.
Krzyzak A; Borkowski K
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():410-3. PubMed ID: 26736286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving the accuracy of PGSE DTI experiments using the spatial distribution of b matrix.
Krzyżak AT; Olejniczak Z
Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Apr; 33(3):286-95. PubMed ID: 25460327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of the systematic errors caused by diffusion gradient inhomogeneity in DTI-computer simulations.
Borkowski K; Krzyżak AT
NMR Biomed; 2019 Nov; 32(11):e4130. PubMed ID: 31343807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of anisotropic phantoms using wood and fiber materials for diffusion tensor imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging.
Suzuki M; Moriya S; Hata J; Tachibana A; Senoo A; Niitsu M
MAGMA; 2019 Oct; 32(5):539-547. PubMed ID: 31144164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Towards the precise microstructural mapping. Testing new anisotropic phantoms with layered and capillary geometries
Mazur W; Krzyzak AT; Raszewski Z
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():2835-2839. PubMed ID: 31946483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simulating cardiac ultrasound image based on MR diffusion tensor imaging.
Qin X; Wang S; Shen M; Lu G; Zhang X; Wagner MB; Fei B
Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5144-56. PubMed ID: 26328966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigation of anisotropic fishing line-based phantom as tool in quality control of diffusion tensor imaging.
de Souza EM; Costa ET; Castellano G
Radiol Phys Technol; 2019 Jun; 12(2):161-171. PubMed ID: 30877555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The design of anisotropic diffusion phantoms for the validation of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging.
Fieremans E; De Deene Y; Delputte S; Ozdemir MS; Achten E; Lemahieu I
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Oct; 53(19):5405-19. PubMed ID: 18765890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Distribution-aware estimation of the minimum achievable uncertainty in diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI).
Duggento A; Giannelli M; Tessa C; Lanzafame S; Guerrisi M; Toschi N
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():5541-5544. PubMed ID: 28269512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combining MR elastography and diffusion tensor imaging for the assessment of anisotropic mechanical properties: a phantom study.
Qin EC; Sinkus R; Geng G; Cheng S; Green M; Rae CD; Bilston LE
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Jan; 37(1):217-26. PubMed ID: 22987805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Five Conductivity Tensor Models and Image Reconstruction Methods Using MRI.
Katoch N; Choi BK; Park JA; Ko IO; Kim HJ
Molecules; 2021 Sep; 26(18):. PubMed ID: 34576970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of MR parameter changes on the quantification of diffusion anisotropy and apparent diffusion coefficient in diffusion tensor imaging: evaluation using a diffusional anisotropic phantom.
Kim SJ; Choi CG; Kim JK; Yun SC; Jahng GH; Jeong HK; Kim EJ
Korean J Radiol; 2015; 16(2):297-303. PubMed ID: 25741191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Software Toolbox for Low-Frequency Conductivity and Current Density Imaging Using MRI.
Sajib SZK; Katoch N; Kim HJ; Kwon OI; Woo EJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 64(11):2505-2514. PubMed ID: 28767360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A review of anisotropic conductivity models of brain white matter based on diffusion tensor imaging.
Wu Z; Liu Y; Hong M; Yu X
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2018 Aug; 56(8):1325-1332. PubMed ID: 29855784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Condition number as a measure of noise performance of diffusion tensor data acquisition schemes with MRI.
Skare S; Hedehus M; Moseley ME; Li TQ
J Magn Reson; 2000 Dec; 147(2):340-52. PubMed ID: 11097823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative study of different level interpolations for improving spatial resolution in diffusion tensor imaging.
Yang F; Zhu YM; Luo JH; Robini M; Liu J; Croisille P
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2014 Jul; 18(4):1317-27. PubMed ID: 25014936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
