BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26736857)

  • 1. Effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on otoacoustic emissions induced by swept tones.
    Shixiong Chen ; Yanbing Jin ; Lisheng Xu ; Guanglin Li
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():2733-6. PubMed ID: 26736857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efferent-mediated reduction in cochlear gain does not alter tuning estimates from stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission group delays.
    Bhagat SP; Kilgore C
    Neurosci Lett; 2014 Jan; 559():132-5. PubMed ID: 24333175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency specificity and left-ear advantage of medial olivocochlear efferent modulation: a study based on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission.
    Xing D; Gong Q
    Neuroreport; 2017 Sep; 28(13):775-778. PubMed ID: 28538522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrically Evoked Medial Olivocochlear Efferent Effects on Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions in Guinea Pigs.
    Berezina-Greene MA; Guinan JJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 18(1):153-163. PubMed ID: 27798720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions evoked by swept tones.
    Chen S; Deng J; Bian L; Li G
    Hear Res; 2013 Dec; 306():104-14. PubMed ID: 24113114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frequency tuning of medial-olivocochlear-efferent acoustic reflexes in humans as functions of probe frequency.
    Lilaonitkul W; Guinan JJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Mar; 107(6):1598-611. PubMed ID: 22190630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medial olivocochlear efferent reflex in humans: otoacoustic emission (OAE) measurement issues and the advantages of stimulus frequency OAEs.
    Guinan JJ; Backus BC; Lilaonitkul W; Aharonson V
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2003 Dec; 4(4):521-40. PubMed ID: 12799992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medial olivocochlear efferent system in humans studied with amplitude-modulated tones.
    Maison S; Micheyl C; Collet L
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Apr; 77(4):1759-68. PubMed ID: 9114234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of olivocochlear bundle section on otoacoustic emissions in humans: efferent effects in comparison with control subjects.
    Williams EA; Brookes GB; Prasher DK
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1994 Mar; 114(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 8203191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contralateral acoustic suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions--activation of the medial olivocochlear system.
    Komazec Z; Filipović D; Milosević D
    Med Pregl; 2003; 56(3-4):124-30. PubMed ID: 12899075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of contralateral pure tone stimulation on distortion emissions suggests a frequency-specific functioning of the efferent cochlear control.
    Althen H; Wittekindt A; Gaese B; Kössl M; Abel C
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Apr; 107(7):1962-9. PubMed ID: 22262828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Musicianship enhances ipsilateral and contralateral efferent gain control to the cochlea.
    Bidelman GM; Schneider AD; Heitzmann VR; Bhagat SP
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():275-283. PubMed ID: 27964936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Medial olivocochlear suppression in musicians versus non-musicians.
    Bulut E; Öztürk G; Taş M; Türkmen MT; Gülmez ZD; Öztürk L
    Physiol Int; 2019 Jun; 106(2):151-157. PubMed ID: 31262207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efferent Modulation of Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emission Fine Structure.
    Zhao W; Dewey JB; Boothalingam S; Dhar S
    Front Syst Neurosci; 2015; 9():168. PubMed ID: 26696843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Spatial Origins of Cochlear Amplification Assessed by Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions.
    Goodman SS; Lee C; Guinan JJ; Lichtenhan JT
    Biophys J; 2020 Mar; 118(5):1183-1195. PubMed ID: 31968228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Swept-Tone Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions in Human Newborns.
    Abdala C; Luo P; Guardia Y
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519889226. PubMed ID: 31789131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distortion products in humans.
    Moulin A; Collet L; Duclaux R
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):193-210. PubMed ID: 8458751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acoustic stimulation of human medial olivocochlear efferents reduces stimulus-frequency and click-evoked otoacoustic emission delays: Implications for cochlear filter bandwidths.
    Francis NA; Guinan JJ
    Hear Res; 2010 Aug; 267(1-2):36-45. PubMed ID: 20430088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Repeatability of click-evoked otoacoustic emission-based medial olivocochlear efferent assay.
    Mishra SK; Lutman ME
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):789-98. PubMed ID: 23739244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measuring stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions using swept tones.
    Kalluri R; Shera CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):356-68. PubMed ID: 23862813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.