BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26736926)

  • 1. Computer aided analysis of prostate histopathology images Gleason grading especially for Gleason score 7.
    Ren J; Sadimin ET; Wang D; Epstein JI; Foran DJ; Qi X
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():3013-6. PubMed ID: 26736926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma using tissue microarrays.
    De la Taille A; Viellefond A; Berger N; Boucher E; De Fromont M; Fondimare A; Molinié V; Piron D; Sibony M; Staroz F; Triller M; Peltier E; Thiounn N; Rubin MA
    Hum Pathol; 2003 May; 34(5):444-9. PubMed ID: 12792917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interobserver variability in Gleason histological grading of prostate cancer.
    Ozkan TA; Eruyar AT; Cebeci OO; Memik O; Ozcan L; Kuskonmaz I
    Scand J Urol; 2016 Dec; 50(6):420-424. PubMed ID: 27416104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A grading dilemma; Gleason scoring system: Are we sufficiently compatible? A multi center study.
    Dere Y; Çelik ÖI; Çelik SY; Ekmekçi S; Evcim G; Pehlivan F; Ağalar A; Deliktaş H; Çulhacı N
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2020 Feb; 63(Supplement):S25-S29. PubMed ID: 32108622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. WeGleNet: A weakly-supervised convolutional neural network for the semantic segmentation of Gleason grades in prostate histology images.
    Silva-Rodríguez J; Colomer A; Naranjo V
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2021 Mar; 88():101846. PubMed ID: 33485056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma among general pathologists.
    Singh RV; Agashe SR; Gosavi AV; Sulhyan KR
    Indian J Cancer; 2011; 48(4):488-95. PubMed ID: 22293266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer aided analysis of prostate histopathology images to support a refined Gleason grading system.
    Ren J; Sadimin E; Foran DJ; Qi X
    Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2017 Jan; 10133():. PubMed ID: 30828124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System.
    Pierconti F; Martini M; Cenci T; Petrone GL; Ricci R; Sacco E; Bassi PF; Larocca LM
    Prostate; 2017 May; 77(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 28144985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inter-observer reproducibility before and after web-based education in the Gleason grading of the prostate adenocarcinoma among the Iranian pathologists.
    Abdollahi A; Sheikhbahaei S; Meysamie A; Bakhshandeh M; Hosseinzadeh H
    Acta Med Iran; 2014; 52(5):370-4. PubMed ID: 24902017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Persistent Homology for the Quantitative Evaluation of Architectural Features in Prostate Cancer Histology.
    Lawson P; Sholl AB; Brown JQ; Fasy BT; Wenk C
    Sci Rep; 2019 Feb; 9(1):1139. PubMed ID: 30718811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inter/intra-observer reproducibility of Gleason scoring in prostate adenocarcinoma in Iranian pathologists.
    Abdollahi A; Meysamie A; Sheikhbahaei S; Ahmadi A; Moradi-Tabriz H; Bakhshandeh M; Hosseinzadeh H
    Urol J; 2012; 9(2):486-90. PubMed ID: 22641492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: urologic pathologists.
    Allsbrook WC; Mangold KA; Johnson MH; Lane RB; Lane CG; Amin MB; Bostwick DG; Humphrey PA; Jones EC; Reuter VE; Sakr W; Sesterhenn IA; Troncoso P; Wheeler TM; Epstein JI
    Hum Pathol; 2001 Jan; 32(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 11172298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automatic grading of prostate cancer in digitized histopathology images: Learning from multiple experts.
    Nir G; Hor S; Karimi D; Fazli L; Skinnider BF; Tavassoli P; Turbin D; Villamil CF; Wang G; Wilson RS; Iczkowski KA; Lucia MS; Black PC; Abolmaesumi P; Goldenberg SL; Salcudean SE
    Med Image Anal; 2018 Dec; 50():167-180. PubMed ID: 30340027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gleason grade 4 prostate adenocarcinoma patterns: an interobserver agreement study among genitourinary pathologists.
    Kweldam CF; Nieboer D; Algaba F; Amin MB; Berney DM; Billis A; Bostwick DG; Bubendorf L; Cheng L; Compérat E; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Evans AJ; Hansel DE; Humphrey PA; Kristiansen G; van der Kwast TH; Magi-Galluzzi C; Montironi R; Netto GJ; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; Tan PH; Varma M; Zhou M; van Leenders GJ
    Histopathology; 2016 Sep; 69(3):441-9. PubMed ID: 27028587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automated gleason grading on prostate biopsy slides by statistical representations of homology profile.
    Yan C; Nakane K; Wang X; Fu Y; Lu H; Fan X; Feldman MD; Madabhushi A; Xu J
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Oct; 194():105528. PubMed ID: 32470903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of Grading Gleason Score 7 Prostatic Adenocarcinoma on Needle Biopsy: Influence of Percent Pattern 4 and Other Histological Factors.
    Meliti A; Sadimin E; Diolombi M; Khani F; Epstein JI
    Prostate; 2017 May; 77(6):681-685. PubMed ID: 28155999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prostate cancer grading: use of graph cut and spatial arrangement of nuclei.
    Nguyen K; Sarkar A; Jain AK
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2014 Dec; 33(12):2254-70. PubMed ID: 25029379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Deep Learning-Based Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Histopathology Images-Role of Multiscale Decision Aggregation and Data Augmentation.
    Karimi D; Nir G; Fazli L; Black PC; Goldenberg L; Salcudean SE
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2020 May; 24(5):1413-1426. PubMed ID: 31567104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The updated grading system of prostate carcinoma: an inter-observer agreement study among general pathologists in an academic practice.
    Al Nemer AM; Elsharkawy T; Elshawarby M; Al-Tamimi D; Kussaibi H; Ahmed A
    APMIS; 2017 Nov; 125(11):957-961. PubMed ID: 28913842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploring automatic prostate histopathology image Gleason grading via local structure modeling.
    Wang D; Foran DJ; Ren J; Zhong H; Kim IY; Qi X
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():2649-52. PubMed ID: 26736836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.