These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26736926)

  • 21. Epithelium segmentation and automated Gleason grading of prostate cancer via deep learning in label-free multiphoton microscopic images.
    Yang Q; Xu Z; Liao C; Cai J; Huang Y; Chen H; Tao X; Huang Z; Chen J; Dong J; Zhu X
    J Biophotonics; 2020 Feb; 13(2):e201900203. PubMed ID: 31710780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading in prostate biopsy samples].
    Bori R; Salamon F; Móczár C; Cserni G
    Orv Hetil; 2013 Aug; 154(31):1219-25. PubMed ID: 23895990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Objective grading of prostate carcinoma based on fractal dimensions: Gleason 3 + 4= 7a ≠ Gleason 4 + 3 =7b].
    Waliszewski P; Wagenlehner F; Kribus S; Schafhauser W; Weidner W; Gattenlöhner S
    Urologe A; 2014 Oct; 53(10):1504-11. PubMed ID: 25015793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: general pathologist.
    Allsbrook WC; Mangold KA; Johnson MH; Lane RB; Lane CG; Epstein JI
    Hum Pathol; 2001 Jan; 32(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 11172299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Diagnosis of Gleason pattern 5 prostate adenocarcinoma on core needle biopsy: an interobserver reproducibility study among urologic pathologists.
    Shah RB; Li J; Cheng L; Egevad L; Deng FM; Fine SW; Kunju LP; Melamed J; Mehra R; Osunkoya AO; Paner GP; Shen SS; Tsuzuki T; Trpkov K; Tian W; Yang XJ; Zhou M
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2015 Sep; 39(9):1242-9. PubMed ID: 25929349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Foamy gland adenocarcinoma of the prostate: incidence, Gleason grade, and early clinical outcome.
    Hudson J; Cao D; Vollmer R; Kibel AS; Grewal S; Humphrey PA
    Hum Pathol; 2012 Jul; 43(7):974-9. PubMed ID: 22221706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Improving the reproducibility of the Gleason scores in small foci of prostate cancer--suggestion of diagnostic criteria for glandular fusion.
    Helpap B; Kristiansen G; Beer M; Köllermann J; Oehler U; Pogrebniak A; Fellbaum Ch
    Pathol Oncol Res; 2012 Jul; 18(3):615-21. PubMed ID: 22179685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A web-based tutorial improves practicing pathologists' Gleason grading of images of prostate carcinoma specimens obtained by needle biopsy: validation of a new medical education paradigm.
    Kronz JD; Silberman MA; Allsbrook WC; Epstein JI
    Cancer; 2000 Oct; 89(8):1818-23. PubMed ID: 11042578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.
    Epstein JI; Egevad L; Amin MB; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA;
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Feb; 40(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 26492179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Prognostic significance of histologic grading in patients with prostate carcinoma who are assessed by the Gleason and World Health Organization grading systems in needle biopsies obtained prior to radiotherapy.
    Lilleby W; Torlakovic G; Torlakovic E; Skovlund E; Fosså SD
    Cancer; 2001 Jul; 92(2):311-9. PubMed ID: 11466684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparative study of the inter-observer variability on Gleason grading against Deep Learning-based approaches for prostate cancer.
    Marrón-Esquivel JM; Duran-Lopez L; Linares-Barranco A; Dominguez-Morales JP
    Comput Biol Med; 2023 Jun; 159():106856. PubMed ID: 37075600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Correlation between visual clues, objective architectural features, and interobserver agreement in prostate cancer.
    di Loreto C; Fitzpatrick B; Underhill S; Kim DH; Dytch HE; Galera-Davidson H; Bibbo M
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1991 Jul; 96(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 2069137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Gleason grading of prostate cancer: level of concordance between pathologists at the University Hospital of the West Indies.
    Coard KC; Freeman VL
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2004 Sep; 122(3):373-6. PubMed ID: 15362366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Self-Learning for Weakly Supervised Gleason Grading of Local Patterns.
    Silva-Rodriguez J; Colomer A; Dolz J; Naranjo V
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2021 Aug; 25(8):3094-3104. PubMed ID: 33621184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate with Gleason pattern 5 on core biopsy: frequency of diagnosis, morphologic subpatterns, and relation to pattern distribution based on the modified Gleason grading system.
    Shah RB; Tadros Y
    Hum Pathol; 2014 Nov; 45(11):2263-9. PubMed ID: 25228336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Ultrasonographic pathological grading of prostate cancer using automatic region-based Gleason grading network.
    Lu X; Zhang S; Liu Z; Liu S; Huang J; Kong G; Li M; Liang Y; Cui Y; Yang C; Zhao S
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2022 Dec; 102():102125. PubMed ID: 36257091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Foamy gland carcinoma of the prostate in needle biopsy: incidence, Gleason grade, and comparative α-methylacyl-CoA racemase vs. ERG expression.
    Warrick JI; Humphrey PA
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2013 Nov; 37(11):1709-14. PubMed ID: 23797726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spatially varying accuracy and reproducibility of prostate segmentation in magnetic resonance images using manual and semiautomated methods.
    Shahedi M; Cool DW; Romagnoli C; Bauman GS; Bastian-Jordan M; Gibson E; Rodrigues G; Ahmad B; Lock M; Fenster A; Ward AD
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):113503. PubMed ID: 25370674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Interobserver variation in prostate cancer Gleason scoring: are there implications for the design of clinical trials and treatment strategies?
    McLean M; Srigley J; Banerjee D; Warde P; Hao Y
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 1997; 9(4):222-5. PubMed ID: 9315395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. High-grade foamy gland prostatic adenocarcinoma on biopsy or transurethral resection: a morphologic study of 55 cases.
    Zhao J; Epstein JI
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2009 Apr; 33(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 19033862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.