These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26737036)

  • 1. Effects of prosthesis use on the capability to control myoelectric robotic prosthetic hands.
    Atzori M; Hager AG; Elsig S; Giatsidis G; Bassetto F; Muller H
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():3456-9. PubMed ID: 26737036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Locomotor Adaptation by Transtibial Amputees Walking With an Experimental Powered Prosthesis Under Continuous Myoelectric Control.
    Huang S; Wensman JP; Ferris DP
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2016 May; 24(5):573-81. PubMed ID: 26057851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of clinical parameters on the control of myoelectric robotic prosthetic hands.
    Atzori M; Gijsberts A; Castellini C; Caputo B; Hager AG; Elsig S; Giatsidis G; Bassetto F; Müller H
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2016; 53(3):345-58. PubMed ID: 27272750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning from demonstration: Teaching a myoelectric prosthesis with an intact limb via reinforcement learning.
    Vasan G; Pilarski PM
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():1457-1464. PubMed ID: 28814025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of real-time machine learning to myoelectric prosthesis control: A case series in adaptive switching.
    Edwards AL; Dawson MR; Hebert JS; Sherstan C; Sutton RS; Chan KM; Pilarski PM
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Oct; 40(5):573-81. PubMed ID: 26423106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Soft Robotics Enables Neuroprosthetic Hand Design.
    Gu G; Zhang N; Chen C; Xu H; Zhu X
    ACS Nano; 2023 Jun; 17(11):9661-9672. PubMed ID: 37196348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Non-Invasive, Temporally Discrete Feedback of Object Contact and Release Improves Grasp Control of Closed-Loop Myoelectric Transradial Prostheses.
    Clemente F; D'Alonzo M; Controzzi M; Edin BB; Cipriani C
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2016 Dec; 24(12):1314-1322. PubMed ID: 26584497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deep learning-based artificial vision for grasp classification in myoelectric hands.
    Ghazaei G; Alameer A; Degenaar P; Morgan G; Nazarpour K
    J Neural Eng; 2017 Jun; 14(3):036025. PubMed ID: 28467317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differences in quality of movements made with body-powered and myoelectric prostheses during activities of daily living.
    Engdahl SM; Gates DH
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2021 Apr; 84():105311. PubMed ID: 33812199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Functional comparison of upper extremity amputees using myoelectric and conventional prostheses.
    Stein RB; Walley M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1983 Jun; 64(6):243-8. PubMed ID: 6860093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Functional Assessment of a Myoelectric Postural Controller and Multi-Functional Prosthetic Hand by Persons With Trans-Radial Limb Loss.
    Segil JL; Huddle SA; Weir RFF
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2017 Jun; 25(6):618-627. PubMed ID: 27390181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of vibrotactile and joint-torque feedback in a myoelectric upper-limb prosthesis.
    Thomas N; Ung G; McGarvey C; Brown JD
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2019 Jun; 16(1):70. PubMed ID: 31186005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Real-time myoelectric control of a multi-fingered hand prosthesis using principal components analysis.
    Matrone GC; Cipriani C; Carrozza MC; Magenes G
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2012 Jun; 9():40. PubMed ID: 22703711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Upper- and lower-limb amputees show reduced levels of eeriness for images of prosthetic hands.
    Buckingham G; Parr J; Wood G; Day S; Chadwell A; Head J; Galpin A; Kenney L; Kyberd P; Gowen E; Poliakoff E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1295-1302. PubMed ID: 31183744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Motor control and learning with lower-limb myoelectric control in amputees.
    Alcaide-Aguirre RE; Morgenroth DC; Ferris DP
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2013; 50(5):687-98. PubMed ID: 24013916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differences in myoelectric and body-powered upper-limb prostheses: Systematic literature review.
    Carey SL; Lura DJ; Highsmith MJ; ;
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2015; 52(3):247-62. PubMed ID: 26230500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of compensatory movements between body-powered and myoelectric prosthesis users during activities of daily living.
    Engdahl SM; Lee C; Gates DH
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2022 Jul; 97():105713. PubMed ID: 35809535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Getting a Grip on the Impact of Incidental Feedback From Body-Powered and Myoelectric Prostheses.
    Gonzalez MA; Lee C; Kang J; Gillespie RB; Gates DH
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2021; 29():1905-1912. PubMed ID: 34516377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EMG-driven shared human-robot compliant control for in-hand object manipulation in hand prostheses.
    Khadivar F; Mendez V; Correia C; Batzianoulis I; Billard A; Micera S
    J Neural Eng; 2022 Dec; 19(6):. PubMed ID: 36384035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visuomotor behaviours when using a myoelectric prosthesis.
    Sobuh MM; Kenney LP; Galpin AJ; Thies SB; McLaughlin J; Kulkarni J; Kyberd P
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Apr; 11():72. PubMed ID: 24758375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.