176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26737132)
1. An experimental phantom study on the effect of calcifications on ultrasound shear wave elastography.
Gregory A; Bayat M; Denis M; Mehrmohammadi M; Fatemi M; Alizad A
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():3843-6. PubMed ID: 26737132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of Calcifications on Breast Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography: An Investigational Study.
Gregory A; Mehrmohammadi M; Denis M; Bayat M; Stan DL; Fatemi M; Alizad A
PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0137898. PubMed ID: 26368939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two-dimensional shear-wave elastography on conventional ultrasound scanners with time-aligned sequential tracking (TAST) and comb-push ultrasound shear elastography (CUSE).
Song P; Macdonald M; Behler R; Lanning J; Wang M; Urban M; Manduca A; Zhao H; Callstrom M; Alizad A; Greenleaf J; Chen S
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 Feb; 62(2):290-302. PubMed ID: 25643079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comb-push ultrasound shear elastography (CUSE): a novel method for two-dimensional shear elasticity imaging of soft tissues.
Song P; Zhao H; Manduca A; Urban MW; Greenleaf JF; Chen S
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Sep; 31(9):1821-32. PubMed ID: 22736690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comb-push ultrasound shear elastography (CUSE) with various ultrasound push beams.
Song P; Urban MW; Manduca A; Zhao H; Greenleaf JF; Chen S
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2013 Aug; 32(8):1435-47. PubMed ID: 23591479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multi-source and multi-directional shear wave generation with intersecting steered ultrasound push beams.
Nabavizadeh A; Song P; Chen S; Greenleaf JF; Urban MW
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 Apr; 62(4):647-62. PubMed ID: 25881343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A new shear wave imaging system for ultrasound elastography.
Qiu W; Wang C; Xiao Y; Qian M; Zheng H
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():3847-50. PubMed ID: 26737133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of 2 shear wave elastography systems in reproducibility and accuracy using an elasticity phantom.
Woo JH; Ko EY; Han BK
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Apr; 100(15):e24921. PubMed ID: 33847610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Scholte wave approach for ultrasonic surface acoustic wave elastography.
Liu J; Leer J; Aglayomov SR; Emelianov SY
Med Phys; 2023 Jul; 50(7):4138-4150. PubMed ID: 36971512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Motion effects on the measurement of stiffness on ultrasound shear wave elastography: a moving liver fibrosis phantom study.
Shin HJ; Kim MJ; Yoon CS; Lee K; Lee KS; Park JC; Lee MJ; Yoon H
Med Ultrason; 2018 Feb; 1(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 29400362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography for Liver Disease. A Critical Appraisal of the Many Actors on the Stage.
Piscaglia F; Salvatore V; Mulazzani L; Cantisani V; Schiavone C
Ultraschall Med; 2016 Feb; 37(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 26871407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of ultrasound elastography, magnetic resonance elastography and finite element model to quantify nonlinear shear modulus.
Pagé G; Bied M; Garteiser P; Van Beers B; Etaix N; Fraschini C; Bel-Brunon A; Gennisson JL
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Oct; 68(20):. PubMed ID: 37703895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Monitoring MR-guided high intensity focused ultrasound therapy using transient supersonic shear wave MR-elastography.
Ishak O; Breton E; Choquet K; Josset A; Cabras P; Vappou J
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Jan; 68(3):. PubMed ID: 36595333
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of viscosity estimation for oil-in-gelatin phantom in shear wave based ultrasound elastography.
Zhu Y; Dong C; Yin Y; Chen X; Guo Y; Zheng Y; Shen Y; Wang T; Zhang X; Chen S
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Feb; 41(2):601-9. PubMed ID: 25542484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A New Criterion for Shear Wave Elastometric Assessment Using Modulus of Stiffness Difference between Object and Environment.
Demin IY; Rykhtik PI; Spivak АE; Safonov DV
Sovrem Tekhnologii Med; 2022; 14(5):5-13. PubMed ID: 37181832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 2-D Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography With Multi-Sphere-Source External Mechanical Vibration: Preliminary Phantom Results.
Yang H; Carrascal CA; Xie H; Shamdasani V; Anthony BW
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Sep; 46(9):2505-2519. PubMed ID: 32513435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of Reconstruction Parameters for 2-D Comb-Push Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography.
Racedo J; Urban MW
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2019 Feb; 66(2):254-263. PubMed ID: 30507530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In Vitro Comparison of Five Different Elastography Systems for Clinical Applications, Using Strain and Shear Wave Technology.
Mulabecirovic A; Vesterhus M; Gilja OH; Havre RF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 42(11):2572-2588. PubMed ID: 27570209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High-Resolution Elastography for Thin-Layer Mechanical Characterization: Toward Skin Investigation.
Chartier C; Mofid Y; Bastard C; Miette V; Maruani A; Machet L; Ossant F
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 43(3):670-681. PubMed ID: 28043724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Supersonic transient magnetic resonance elastography for quantitative assessment of tissue elasticity.
Liu Y; Liu J; Fite BZ; Foiret J; Ilovitsh A; Leach JK; Dumont E; Caskey CF; Ferrara KW
Phys Med Biol; 2017 May; 62(10):4083-4106. PubMed ID: 28426437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
