These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26737186)

  • 21. An advanced boundary element method (BEM) implementation for the forward problem of electromagnetic source imaging.
    Akalin-Acar Z; Gençer NG
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Nov; 49(21):5011-28. PubMed ID: 15584534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dipole estimation errors due to not incorporating anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
    Hallez H; Staelens S; Lemahieu I
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(20):6079-93. PubMed ID: 19779215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for anisotropic inhomogeneous head tissue conductivity in human head modelling.
    Bashar MR; Li Y; Wen P
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2010 Jun; 33(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 20502999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of boundary element methods for the EEG forward problem: effect of linear interpolation.
    Schlitt HA; Heller L; Aaron R; Best E; Ranken DM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1995 Jan; 42(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 7851930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Use of the isolated problem approach for multi-compartment BEM models of electro-magnetic source imaging.
    Gençer NG; Akalin-Acar Z
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 50(13):3007-22. PubMed ID: 15972977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods.
    Mosher JC; Leahy RM; Lewis PS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 Mar; 46(3):245-59. PubMed ID: 10097460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A Finite-Difference Solution for the EEG Forward Problem in Inhomogeneous Anisotropic Media.
    Cuartas Morales E; Acosta-Medina CD; Castellanos-Dominguez G; Mantini D
    Brain Topogr; 2019 Mar; 32(2):229-239. PubMed ID: 30341590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Using reciprocity for relating the simulation of transcranial current stimulation to the EEG forward problem.
    Wagner S; Lucka F; Vorwerk J; Herrmann CS; Nolte G; Burger M; Wolters CH
    Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 140():163-73. PubMed ID: 27125841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Three-dimensional finite-difference EEG forward problem solution on high performance computers.
    Mininel S; Vatta F; Collaone A; Bruno P; Inchingolo P
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():1114-7. PubMed ID: 17946444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fast multipole acceleration of the MEG/EEG boundary element method.
    Kybic J; Clerc M; Faugeras O; Keriven R; Papadopoulo T
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(19):4695-710. PubMed ID: 16177498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Generalized head models for MEG/EEG: boundary element method beyond nested volumes.
    Kybic J; Clerc M; Faugeras O; Keriven R; Papadopoulo T
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(5):1333-46. PubMed ID: 16481698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A Finite Element Solution of the Forward Problem in EEG for Multipolar Sources.
    Beltrachini L
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2019 Mar; 27(3):368-377. PubMed ID: 30561347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
    Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Concentration maximization and local basis expansions (LBEX) for linear inverse problems.
    Mitra PP; Maniar H
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 53(9):1775-82. PubMed ID: 16941833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Use of anisotropic modelling in electrical impedance tomography: description of method and preliminary assessment of utility in imaging brain function in the adult human head.
    Abascal JF; Arridge SR; Atkinson D; Horesh R; Fabrizi L; De Lucia M; Horesh L; Bayford RH; Holder DS
    Neuroimage; 2008 Nov; 43(2):258-68. PubMed ID: 18694835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. EEG human head modelling based on heterogeneous tissue conductivity.
    Wen P; Li Y
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2006 Sep; 29(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 17058584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A realistic, accurate and fast source modeling approach for the EEG forward problem.
    Miinalainen T; Rezaei A; Us D; Nüßing A; Engwer C; Wolters CH; Pursiainen S
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jan; 184():56-67. PubMed ID: 30165251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Rapidly recomputable EEG forward models for realistic head shapes.
    Ermer JJ; Mosher JC; Baillet S; Leah RM
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Apr; 46(4):1265-81. PubMed ID: 11324964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A global sensitivity analysis of three- and four-layer EEG conductivity models.
    Vallaghé S; Clerc M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Apr; 56(4):988-95. PubMed ID: 19272874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A method for localizing EEG sources in realistic head models.
    Cuffin BN
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1995 Jan; 42(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 7851932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.