These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26737307)

  • 1. Preliminary evaluation of the tactile feedback system based on artificial skin and electrotactile stimulation.
    Franceschi M; Seminara L; Pinna L; Dosen S; Farina D; Valle M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():4554-7. PubMed ID: 26737307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Embedded Electrotactile Feedback System for Hand Prostheses Using Matrix Electrode and Electronic Skin.
    Abbass Y; Saleh M; Dosen S; Valle M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst; 2021 Oct; 15(5):912-925. PubMed ID: 34432633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A System for Electrotactile Feedback Using Electronic Skin and Flexible Matrix Electrodes: Experimental Evaluation.
    Franceschi M; Seminara L; Dosen S; Strbac M; Valle M; Farina D
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2017; 10(2):162-172. PubMed ID: 27775538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Somatotopical feedback versus non-somatotopical feedback for phantom digit sensation on amputees using electrotactile stimulation.
    Zhang D; Xu H; Shull PB; Liu J; Zhu X
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 May; 12():44. PubMed ID: 25929589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A sensory feedback system for prosthetic hand based on evoked tactile sensation.
    Liu XX; Chai GH; Qu HE; Lan N
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():2493-6. PubMed ID: 26736798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An Experimental Protocol for Evaluating Pulse Width Modulation Ranges of Evoked Tactile Sensory Feedback in Amputees
    Yang F; Hao MZ; Zhang J; Chou CH; Lan N
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():3869-3872. PubMed ID: 33018845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fusion of dual modalities of non-invasive sensory feedback for object profiling with prosthetic hands.
    Zhang J; Chou CH; Hao M; Li Y; Yu Y; Lan N
    Front Neurorobot; 2023; 17():1298176. PubMed ID: 38162892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Developing Non-Somatotopic Phantom Finger Sensation to Comparable Levels of Somatotopic Sensation through User Training With Electrotactile Stimulation.
    Chai G; Zhang D; Zhu X
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2017 May; 25(5):469-480. PubMed ID: 27323369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Substitutive proprioception feedback of a prosthetic wrist by electrotactile stimulation.
    Han Y; Lu Y; Zuo Y; Song H; Chou CH; Wang X; Li X; Li L; Niu CM; Hou W
    Front Neurosci; 2023; 17():1135687. PubMed ID: 36895418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensory feedback from a prosthetic hand based on air-mediated pressure from the hand to the forearm skin.
    Antfolk C; Björkman A; Frank SO; Sebelius F; Lundborg G; Rosen B
    J Rehabil Med; 2012 Jul; 44(8):702-7. PubMed ID: 22729800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Non-Invasive Stable Sensory Feedback for Closed-Loop Control of Hand Prosthesis.
    Zhang J; Chou CH; Wu X; Pei W; Lan N
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2022 Jul; 2022():2344-2347. PubMed ID: 36086109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of electrode size and spacing on sensory modalities in the phantom thumb perception area for the forearm amputees.
    Li P; Chai GH; Zhu KH; Lan N; Sui XH
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():3383-6. PubMed ID: 26737018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Towards optimizing the non-invasive sensory feedback interfaces in a neural prosthetic control.
    Su S; Chai G; Meng J; Sheng X; Mouraux A; Zhu X
    J Neural Eng; 2022 Feb; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 35073525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Artificial tactile and proprioceptive feedback improves performance and confidence on object identification tasks.
    Schiefer MA; Graczyk EL; Sidik SM; Tan DW; Tyler DJ
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0207659. PubMed ID: 30517154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intensity Discriminability of Electrocutaneous and Intraneural Stimulation Pulse Frequency in Intact Individuals and Amputees.
    George JA; Brinton MR; Colgan PC; Colvin GK; Bensmaia SJ; Clark GA
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():3893-3896. PubMed ID: 33018851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Full-hand electrotactile feedback using electronic skin and matrix electrodes for high-bandwidth human-machine interfacing.
    Abbass Y; Dosen S; Seminara L; Valle M
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2022 Jul; 380(2228):20210017. PubMed ID: 35762222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of Different Tactile Feedback on Myoelectric Closed-Loop Control for Grasping Based on Electrotactile Stimulation.
    Xu H; Zhang D; Huegel JC; Xu W; Zhu X
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2016 Aug; 24(8):827-36. PubMed ID: 26372430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Object discrimination using electrotactile feedback.
    Arakeri TJ; Hasse BA; Fuglevand AJ
    J Neural Eng; 2018 Aug; 15(4):046007. PubMed ID: 29629874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characterization of evoked tactile sensation in forearm amputees with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.
    Chai G; Sui X; Li S; He L; Lan N
    J Neural Eng; 2015 Dec; 12(6):066002. PubMed ID: 26401550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of vibration characteristics and vibror arrangement on the tactile perception of the upper arm in healthy subjects and upper limb amputees.
    Guemann M; Bouvier S; Halgand C; Paclet F; Borrini L; Ricard D; Lapeyre E; Cattaert D; Rugy A
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2019 Nov; 16(1):138. PubMed ID: 31722740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.