These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26737622)

  • 1. Electrohysterographic detection of uterine contractions in term pregnancy.
    Bajlekov GI; Rabotti C; Oei SG; Mischi M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():5851-4. PubMed ID: 26737622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automated electrohysterographic detection of uterine contractions for monitoring of pregnancy: feasibility and prospects.
    Muszynski C; Happillon T; Azudin K; Tylcz JB; Istrate D; Marque C
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 May; 18(1):136. PubMed ID: 29739438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of internal uterine pressure by joint amplitude and frequency analysis of electrohysterographic signals.
    Rabotti C; Mischi M; van Laar JO; Oei GS; Bergmans JW
    Physiol Meas; 2008 Jul; 29(7):829-41. PubMed ID: 18583724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction of intrauterine pressure waveform from transabdominal electrohysterography.
    Euliano T; Skowronski M; Marossero D; Shuster J; Edwards R
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Dec; 19(12):811-6. PubMed ID: 17190691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New electrohysterogram-based estimators of intrauterine pressure signal, tonus and contraction peak for non-invasive labor monitoring.
    Benalcazar-Parra C; Garcia-Casado J; Ye-Lin Y; Alberola-Rubio J; Lopez Á; Perales-Marin A; Prats-Boluda G
    Physiol Meas; 2019 Sep; 40(8):085003. PubMed ID: 31370050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrohysterography during pregnancy: preliminary report.
    Gondry J; Marque C; Duchene J; Cabrol D
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1993; 27(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 8369867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between electrohysterogram and internal uterine pressure: a preliminary study.
    Rabotti C; Mischi M; van Laar JO; Aelen P; Oei SG; Bergmans JW
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():1661-4. PubMed ID: 17946058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Low-complexity intrauterine pressure estimation using the Teager energy operator on electrohysterographic recordings.
    Rooijakkers MJ; Rabotti C; Oei SG; Aarts RM; Mischi M
    Physiol Meas; 2014 Jul; 35(7):1215-28. PubMed ID: 24853038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultrasound analysis of the uterine wall movement for improved electrohysterographic measurement and modeling.
    Rabotti C; de Lau H; Haazen N; Oei G; Mischi M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():7436-9. PubMed ID: 24111464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Electrohysterography. A promising alternative for monitoring contractions].
    Vlemminx MW; de Lau H; Vullings R; Peters CH; Oei SG
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2015; 159():A8535. PubMed ID: 25650036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automatic identification of motion artifacts in EHG recording for robust analysis of uterine contractions.
    Ye-Lin Y; Garcia-Casado J; Prats-Boluda G; Alberola-Rubio J; Perales A
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2014; 2014():470786. PubMed ID: 24523828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acquisition and Analysis of Electrohysterogram Signal.
    R P; S SD
    J Med Syst; 2020 Feb; 44(3):66. PubMed ID: 32040634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Critical analysis of electrohysterographic methods for continuous monitoring of intrauterine pressure.
    Rooijakkers MJ; Rabotti C; Oei SG; Mischi M
    Math Biosci Eng; 2020 Apr; 17(4):3019-3039. PubMed ID: 32987514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monitoring uterine activity during labor: a comparison of 3 methods.
    Euliano TY; Nguyen MT; Darmanjian S; McGorray SP; Euliano N; Onkala A; Gregg AR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 208(1):66.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23122926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Qualitative assessment of interpretability and observer agreement of three uterine monitoring techniques.
    Thijssen KMJ; Tissink JGLJ; Dieleman JP; Van der Hout-van der Jagt MB; Westerhuis MEMH; Oei SG
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Dec; 255():142-146. PubMed ID: 33129016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Myometrium electromechanical modeling for internal uterine pressure estimation by electrohysterography.
    Rabotti C; Mischi M; van Laar JO; Oei SG; Bergmans JW
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():6259-62. PubMed ID: 19963667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multi-channel electrohysterography enabled uterine contraction characterization and its effect in delivery assessment.
    Shen J; Liu Y; Zhang M; Pumir A; Mu L; Li B; Xu J
    Comput Biol Med; 2023 Dec; 167():107697. PubMed ID: 37976821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Prognostic value of chosen parameters of mechanical and bioelectrical uterine activity in prediction of threatening preterm labour].
    Zietek J; Sikora J; Horoba K; Matonia A; Jezewski J; Magnucki J; Kobielska L
    Ginekol Pol; 2009 Mar; 80(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 19382611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrohysterography for uterine monitoring during term labour compared to external tocodynamometry and intra-uterine pressure catheter.
    Vlemminx MWC; Thijssen KMJ; Bajlekov GI; Dieleman JP; Van Der Hout-Van Der Jagt MB; Oei SG
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Aug; 215():197-205. PubMed ID: 28649034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrohysterographic conduction velocity estimation.
    Mischi M; Rabotti C; Vosters LJ; Oei SG; Bergmans JM
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():6934-7. PubMed ID: 19964460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.