These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26737873)

  • 1. A Multi-techniques Approach to assess reprocessing of Single-use electrosurgical pencils.
    Tessarolo F; Torres S; Ballesteros L; Rigoni M; Piccoli F; Caola I; Montoya Y; Nollo G
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():6876-9. PubMed ID: 26737873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing organic material on single-use vessel sealing devices: a comparative study of reprocessed and new LigaSure™ devices.
    Chivukula SR; Lammers S; Wagner J
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Aug; 35(8):4539-4549. PubMed ID: 32909208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Committee opinion no. 537: reprocessed single-use devices.
    Committee on Gynecologic Practice, The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
    Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Oct; 120(4):974-6. PubMed ID: 22996127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 769: Reprocessed Single-Use Devices.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 133(3):e235-e237. PubMed ID: 30801476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Specific hygiene issues relating to reprocessing and reuse of single-use devices for laparoscopic surgery.
    Roth K; Heeg P; Reichl R
    Surg Endosc; 2002 Jul; 16(7):1091-7. PubMed ID: 12165829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sterility and microbiological assessment of reused single-use cardiac electrophysiology catheters.
    Tessarolo F; Caola I; Caciagli P; Guarrera GM; Nollo G
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 27(12):1385-92. PubMed ID: 17152039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 769 Summary: Reprocessed Single-Use Devices.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 133(3):600-601. PubMed ID: 30801468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Structural damage and chemical contaminants on reprocessed arthroscopic shaver blades.
    Kobayashi M; Nakagawa Y; Okamoto Y; Nakamura S; Nakamura T
    Am J Sports Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):266-73. PubMed ID: 19118081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The sterilization efficacy of reprocessed single use diathermy pencils.
    Batista Neto S; Graziano KU; Padoveze MC; Kawagoe JY
    Rev Lat Am Enfermagem; 2010; 18(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 20428701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microbiological, microstructure, and material science examinations of reprocessed Combitubes after multiple reuse.
    Lipp MD; Jaehnichen G; Golecki N; Fecht G; Reichl R; Heeg P
    Anesth Analg; 2000 Sep; 91(3):693-7. PubMed ID: 10960402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Micro/nanostructured surface modification using femtosecond laser pulses on minimally invasive electrosurgical devices.
    Lin CC; Lin HJ; Lin YH; Sugiatno E; Ruslin M; Su CY; Ou KL; Cheng HY
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2017 May; 105(4):865-873. PubMed ID: 26821850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of Anti-Sticking Nanostructured Surface Coating on Minimally Invasive Electrosurgical Device in Brain.
    Cheng HY; Ou KL; Chiang HJ; Lin LH
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2015 Oct; 43(10):2383-93. PubMed ID: 25851468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Research and Reflection on Reprocessed Medical Devices Supervision].
    Yang X; Xu W; Wang Y; Tian J
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 42(4):286-288. PubMed ID: 30112897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Safety evaluation of single-use medical devices after submission to simulated reutilization cycles.
    da Silva MV; Ribeiro Ade F; Pinto Tde J
    J AOAC Int; 2005; 88(3):823-9. PubMed ID: 16001858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reuse of single-use medical devices: informed consent and physician liability.
    Colonna TE; Thomas DE
    Tex Med; 1999 Mar; 95(3):64-7. PubMed ID: 10932637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reprocessing and reuse of single-use medical devices used during hemodynamic procedures in Brazil: a widespread and largely overlooked problem.
    Amarante JM; Toscano CM; Pearson ML; Roth V; Jarvis WR; Levin AS
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 29(9):854-8. PubMed ID: 18647118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of performance characteristics between new and reprocessed electrophysiology catheters.
    Lester BR; Alexander AA; Miller K; Boser NP; Sullivan BF; Brucker GG
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2006 Nov; 17(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 17226083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of parameters associated to the risk of PVC catheter reuse.
    Granados DL; Jiménez A; Cuadrado TR
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2001; 58(5):505-10. PubMed ID: 11505424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Decontaminated single-use devices: an oxymoron that may be placing patients at risk for cross-contamination.
    Heeg P; Roth K; Reichl R; Cogdill CP; Bond WW
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2001 Sep; 22(9):542-9. PubMed ID: 11732782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What is the use? An international look at reuse of single-use medical devices.
    Popp W; Rasslan O; Unahalekhaka A; Brenner P; Fischnaller E; Fathy M; Goldman C; Gillespie E
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2010 Jul; 213(4):302-7. PubMed ID: 20471316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.