These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26738910)

  • 1. Understanding Orthopaedic Registry Studies: A Comparison with Clinical Studies.
    Inacio MC; Paxton EW; Dillon MT
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Jan; 98(1):e3. PubMed ID: 26738910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of registry data in the evaluation of mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.
    Namba RS; Inacio MC; Paxton EW; Robertsson O; Graves SE
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93 Suppl 3():48-50. PubMed ID: 22262423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. International comparative evaluation of fixed-bearing non-posterior-stabilized and posterior-stabilized total knee replacements.
    Comfort T; Baste V; Froufe MA; Namba R; Bordini B; Robertsson O; Cafri G; Paxton E; Sedrakyan A; Graves S
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Dec; 96 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):65-72. PubMed ID: 25520421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modes of failure of total knee arthroplasty: registries and realities.
    Siqueira MB; Klika AK; Higuera CA; Barsoum WK
    J Knee Surg; 2015 Apr; 28(2):127-38. PubMed ID: 25419836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty modes of failure: wear is not the main reason for failure: a multicentre study of 418 failed knees.
    Epinette JA; Brunschweiler B; Mertl P; Mole D; Cazenave A;
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2012 Oct; 98(6 Suppl):S124-30. PubMed ID: 22926294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. International comparative evaluation of knee replacement with fixed or mobile-bearing posterior-stabilized prostheses.
    Graves S; Sedrakyan A; Baste V; Gioe TJ; Namba R; Martínez Cruz O; Stea S; Paxton E; Banerjee S; Isaacs AJ; Robertsson O
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Dec; 96 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):59-64. PubMed ID: 25520420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The results of TKA: what the registries don't tell us.
    Barrack RL
    Orthopedics; 2011 Sep; 34(9):e485-7. PubMed ID: 21902139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is there a difference in total knee arthroplasty risk of revision in highly crosslinked versus conventional polyethylene?
    Paxton EW; Inacio MC; Kurtz S; Love R; Cafri G; Namba RS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Mar; 473(3):999-1008. PubMed ID: 25567357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the Norwegian knee arthroplasty register and a United States arthroplasty registry.
    Paxton EW; Furnes O; Namba RS; Inacio MC; Fenstad AM; Havelin LI
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93 Suppl 3():20-30. PubMed ID: 22262419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. LCS mobile-bearing total knee replacement. A 10-year's follow-up study.
    Vogt JC; Saarbach C
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 May; 95(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 19328763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. International comparative evaluation of knee replacement with fixed or mobile non-posterior-stabilized implants.
    Namba R; Graves S; Robertsson O; Furnes O; Stea S; Puig-Verdié L; Hoeffel D; Cafri G; Paxton E; Sedrakyan A
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Dec; 96 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):52-8. PubMed ID: 25520419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intraoperative fractures and ligament tears during total knee arthroplasty. A 1795 posterostabilized TKA continuous series.
    Pinaroli A; Piedade SR; Servien E; Neyret P
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 May; 95(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 19423419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The reasons for knee arthroplasty revisions are incomparable in the different arthroplasty registries.
    Niinimäki TT
    Knee; 2015 Mar; 22(2):142-4. PubMed ID: 25596073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bone loss during revision of unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of implanted polyethylene thickness from the National Joint Registry data.
    Sarraf KM; Konan S; Pastides PS; Haddad FS; Oussedik S
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Oct; 28(9):1571-4. PubMed ID: 23538124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lower prosthesis-specific 10-year revision rate with crosslinked than with non-crosslinked polyethylene in primary total knee arthroplasty.
    de Steiger RN; Muratoglu O; Lorimer M; Cuthbert AR; Graves SE
    Acta Orthop; 2015; 86(6):721-7. PubMed ID: 26119884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk of revision for fixed versus mobile-bearing primary total knee replacements.
    Namba RS; Inacio MC; Paxton EW; Ake CF; Wang C; Gross TP; Marinac-Dabic D; Sedrakyan A
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Nov; 94(21):1929-35. PubMed ID: 23138235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. RSA and registries: the quest for phased introduction of new implants.
    Nelissen RG; Pijls BG; Kärrholm J; Malchau H; Nieuwenhuijse MJ; Valstar ER
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93 Suppl 3():62-5. PubMed ID: 22262426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Complications after total knee arthroplasty: a comprehensive report.
    Frosch P; Decking J; Theis C; Drees P; Schoellner C; Eckardt A
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2004 Dec; 70(6):565-9. PubMed ID: 15669457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A distributed health data network analysis of survival outcomes: the International Consortium of Orthopaedic Registries perspective.
    Banerjee S; Cafri G; Isaacs AJ; Graves S; Paxton E; Marinac-Dabic D; Sedrakyan A
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Dec; 96 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):7-11. PubMed ID: 25520413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High early revision rate with the FPV patello-femoral unicompartmental arthroplasty.
    Davies AP
    Knee; 2013 Dec; 20(6):482-4. PubMed ID: 23953660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.