These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26739360)

  • 1. Socially Desirable Responding in Web-Based Questionnaires: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Candor Hypothesis.
    Gnambs T; Kaspar K
    Assessment; 2017 Sep; 24(6):746-762. PubMed ID: 26739360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Socially desirable responding on the web: investigating the candor hypothesis.
    Risko EF; Quilty LC; Oakman JM
    J Pers Assess; 2006 Dec; 87(3):269-76. PubMed ID: 17134335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Social Desirability in Spouse Ratings.
    Vésteinsdóttir V; Steingrimsdottir ED; Joinson A; Reips UD; Thorsdottir F
    Psychol Rep; 2019 Apr; 122(2):593-608. PubMed ID: 29648502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Questions on honest responding.
    Vésteinsdóttir V; Joinson A; Reips UD; Danielsdottir HB; Thorarinsdottir EA; Thorsdottir F
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Apr; 51(2):811-825. PubMed ID: 30565012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Socially desirable responding and its elusive effects on the validity of personality assessments.
    Paunonen SV; LeBel EP
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Jul; 103(1):158-75. PubMed ID: 22564012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Social desirability and self-reports: testing models of socially desirable responding.
    Holtgraves T
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2004 Feb; 30(2):161-72. PubMed ID: 15030631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The desirability bias in personality-related syllogistic reasoning.
    Hadžiahmetović N; Opačić G; Teovanović P; Kolenović-Đapo J
    Scand J Psychol; 2024 Jun; 65(3):394-402. PubMed ID: 38041434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are social desirability scales desirable? A meta-analytic test of the validity of social desirability scales in the context of prosocial behavior.
    Lanz L; Thielmann I; Gerpott FH
    J Pers; 2022 Apr; 90(2):203-221. PubMed ID: 34265863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Social desirability, anonymity, and Internet-based questionnaires.
    Joinson A
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 1999 Aug; 31(3):433-8. PubMed ID: 10502866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Disclosure of sensitive behaviors across self-administered survey modes: a meta-analysis.
    Gnambs T; Kaspar K
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Dec; 47(4):1237-1259. PubMed ID: 25410404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of elaboration on socially desirable responding and the validity of biodata measures.
    Schmitt N; Oswald FL; Kim BH; Gillespie MA; Ramsay LJ; Yoo TY
    J Appl Psychol; 2003 Dec; 88(6):979-88. PubMed ID: 14640810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Meta-Analytic Multitrait Multirater Separation of Substance and Style in Social Desirability Scales.
    Connelly BS; Chang L
    J Pers; 2016 Jun; 84(3):319-34. PubMed ID: 25565409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Well-being scales do not measure social desirability.
    McCrae RR
    J Gerontol; 1986 May; 41(3):390-2. PubMed ID: 3700990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Paper-and-pencil and web-based testing: the measurement invariance of the Big Five personality tests in applied settings.
    Vecchione M; Alessandri G; Barbaranelli C
    Assessment; 2012 Jun; 19(2):243-6. PubMed ID: 21862530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Social desirability effects in driver behavior inventories.
    Af Wåhlberg AE
    J Safety Res; 2010 Apr; 41(2):99-106. PubMed ID: 20497795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of ageing on self-reported aggression measures are partly explained by response bias.
    Vigil-Colet A; Lorenzo-Seva U; Morales-Vives F
    Psicothema; 2015; 27(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 26260926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relationship between social desirability bias and self-reports of health, substance use, and social network factors among urban substance users in Baltimore, Maryland.
    Latkin CA; Edwards C; Davey-Rothwell MA; Tobin KE
    Addict Behav; 2017 Oct; 73():133-136. PubMed ID: 28511097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Socially desirable responding and offence characteristics among rapists.
    Kroner DG; Weekes JR
    Violence Vict; 1996; 11(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 9125793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Social desirability bias in dietary self-report may compromise the validity of dietary intake measures.
    Hebert JR; Clemow L; Pbert L; Ockene IS; Ockene JK
    Int J Epidemiol; 1995 Apr; 24(2):389-98. PubMed ID: 7635601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Examination of the equivalence of self-report survey-based paper-and-pencil and internet data collection methods.
    Weigold A; Weigold IK; Russell EJ
    Psychol Methods; 2013 Mar; 18(1):53-70. PubMed ID: 23477606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.