368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26740065)
1. Dimensionality and Item-Difficulty Hierarchy of the Lower Extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment in Individuals With Subacute and Chronic Stroke.
Balasubramanian CK; Li CY; Bowden MG; Duncan PW; Kautz SA; Velozo CA
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2016 Apr; 97(4):582-589.e2. PubMed ID: 26740065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dimensionality and construct validity of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the upper extremity.
Woodbury ML; Velozo CA; Richards LG; Duncan PW; Studenski S; Lai SM
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Jun; 88(6):715-23. PubMed ID: 17532892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dimensionality and item-difficulty hierarchy of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity among Japanese patients who have experienced stroke.
Tauchi Y; Kyougoku M; Takahashi K; Okita Y; Takebayashi T
Top Stroke Rehabil; 2022 Dec; 29(8):579-587. PubMed ID: 34414858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of a Short Form Assessment Combining the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity and the Wolf Motor Function Test for Evaluating Stroke Recovery.
Woodbury M; Grattan ES; Li CY
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2023 Oct; 104(10):1661-1668. PubMed ID: 37245692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does an association exist between the hierarchical motor components of upper and lower limbs in stroke?
Arya KN; Pandian S; Kumar D
J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2016 Jul; 20(3):504-11. PubMed ID: 27634071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimal clinically important difference of the lower-extremity fugl-meyer assessment in chronic-stroke.
Pandian S; Arya KN; Kumar D
Top Stroke Rehabil; 2016 Aug; 23(4):233-9. PubMed ID: 27086865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are the hierarchical properties of the Fugl-Meyer assessment scale the same in acute stroke and chronic stroke?
Crow JL; Kwakkel G; Bussmann JB; Goos JA; Harmeling-van der Wel BC;
Phys Ther; 2014 Jul; 94(7):977-86. PubMed ID: 24677254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rasch analysis of the Italian Lower Extremity Functional Scale: insights on dimensionality and suggestions for an improved 15-item version.
Bravini E; Giordano A; Sartorio F; Ferriero G; Vercelli S
Clin Rehabil; 2017 Apr; 31(4):532-543. PubMed ID: 27141086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Item Difficulty of Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity in Persons With Chronic Stroke With Moderate-to-Severe Upper Limb Impairment.
Hijikata N; Kawakami M; Ishii R; Tsuzuki K; Nakamura T; Okuyama K; Liu M
Front Neurol; 2020; 11():577855. PubMed ID: 33304304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Determining Levels of Upper Extremity Movement Impairment by Applying a Cluster Analysis to the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity in Chronic Stroke.
Woytowicz EJ; Rietschel JC; Goodman RN; Conroy SS; Sorkin JD; Whitall J; McCombe Waller S
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2017 Mar; 98(3):456-462. PubMed ID: 27519928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Functional Test of the Hemiparetic Upper Extremity: A Rasch Analysis With Theoretical Implications.
Rowe VT; Winstein CJ; Wolf SL; Woodbury ML
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2017 Oct; 98(10):1977-1983. PubMed ID: 28434819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is the long form of the Fugl-Meyer motor scale more responsive than the short form in patients with stroke?
Chen KL; Chen CT; Chou YT; Shih CL; Koh CL; Hsieh CL
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 May; 95(5):941-9. PubMed ID: 24491466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cutoff Score of the Lower-Extremity Motor Subscale of Fugl-Meyer Assessment in Chronic Stroke Survivors: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Kwong PWH; Ng SSM
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2019 Sep; 100(9):1782-1787. PubMed ID: 30902629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity of the Neuromuscular Recovery Scale: a measurement model approach.
Velozo C; Moorhouse M; Ardolino E; Lorenz D; Suter S; Basso DM; Behrman AL
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Aug; 96(8):1385-96. PubMed ID: 25912666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rasch analysis staging methodology to classify upper extremity movement impairment after stroke.
Woodbury ML; Velozo CA; Richards LG; Duncan PW
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Aug; 94(8):1527-33. PubMed ID: 23529144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Structural validity and internal consistency of a hypothesized factor structure of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the upper extremity.
Tauchi Y; Kyougoku M; Okita Y; Takebayashi T
Top Stroke Rehabil; 2023 Jul; 30(5):501-511. PubMed ID: 35491995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of biofeedback cycling training on functional recovery and walking ability of lower extremity in patients with stroke.
Yang HC; Lee CL; Lin R; Hsu MJ; Chen CH; Lin JH; Lo SK
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2014 Jan; 30(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 24388057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contribution of subjective balance confidence on functional mobility in subjects with chronic stroke.
Ng SS
Disabil Rehabil; 2011; 33(23-24):2291-8. PubMed ID: 21473685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Longitudinal stability of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the upper extremity.
Woodbury ML; Velozo CA; Richards LG; Duncan PW; Studenski S; Lai SM
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Aug; 89(8):1563-9. PubMed ID: 18674991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rasch validation of the streamlined Wolf Motor Function Test in people with chronic stroke and subacute stroke.
Chen HF; Wu CY; Lin KC; Chen HC; Chen CP; Chen CK
Phys Ther; 2012 Aug; 92(8):1017-26. PubMed ID: 22556276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
