These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26740491)
1. Sonographically Identified Echogenic Renal Masses Up to 1 cm in Size Are So Rarely Malignant They Can Be Safely Ignored. Itani M; Pandya A; Bude RO J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Feb; 35(2):323-8. PubMed ID: 26740491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Do Incidental Hyperechoic Renal Lesions Measuring Up to 1 cm Warrant Further Imaging? Outcomes of 161 Lesions. Doshi AM; Ayoola A; Rosenkrantz AB AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Aug; 209(2):346-350. PubMed ID: 28609114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Criteria for ultrasound differentiation of small angiomyolipomas (< or = 3 cm) and renal cell carcinomas]. Zebedin D; Kammerhuber F; Uggowitzer MM; Szolar DH Rofo; 1998 Dec; 169(6):627-32. PubMed ID: 9930217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Etiology of Small Echogenic Renal Masses. Kwong A; Mitchell A; Wang D; McGahan JP J Ultrasound Med; 2022 Oct; 41(10):2567-2575. PubMed ID: 35043978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Renal Cell Carcinomas: Sonographic Appearance Depending on Size and Histologic Type. Sidhar K; McGahan JP; Early HM; Corwin M; Fananapazir G; Gerscovich EO J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Feb; 35(2):311-20. PubMed ID: 26740493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of Contrast-enhanced US for Differentiating Benign from Malignant Solid Small Renal Masses. Atri M; Tabatabaeifar L; Jang HJ; Finelli A; Moshonov H; Jewett M Radiology; 2015 Sep; 276(3):900-8. PubMed ID: 25919803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Distinguishes Malignancy in T1-Hyperintense Small Renal Masses. Ludwig DR; Ballard DH; Shetty AS; Siegel CL; Yano M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jan; 214(1):114-121. PubMed ID: 31573857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Frequency of Angiomyolipomas Among Echogenic Nonshadowing Renal Masses (> 4 mm) Found at Ultrasound and the Utility of MRI for Diagnosis. de Silva S; Copping R; Malouf D; Hutton A; Maclean F; Aslan P AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Nov; 209(5):1074-1080. PubMed ID: 28834450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prevalence of Solid Tumors in Incidentally Detected Homogeneous Renal Masses Measuring > 20 HU on Portal Venous Phase CT. Corwin MT; Hansra SS; Loehfelm TW; Lamba R; Fananapazir G AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):W173-W177. PubMed ID: 29995501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tuberose sclerosis complex: analysis of growth rates aids differentiation of renal cell carcinoma from atypical or minimal-fat-containing angiomyolipoma. Patel U; Simpson E; Kingswood JC; Saggar-Malik AK Clin Radiol; 2005 Jun; 60(6):665-73; discussion 663-4. PubMed ID: 16038693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Characterization and staging of renal tumors: significance of MRI diagnostics]. Kalinka A; Gerlach A; Arlart IP; Günes N; Hauser TK; Würstlin S; Bosse A Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 16508837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pathological features of renal neoplasms classified by size and symptomatology. Schlomer B; Figenshau RS; Yan Y; Venkatesh R; Bhayani SB J Urol; 2006 Oct; 176(4 Pt 1):1317-20; discussion 1320. PubMed ID: 16952619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Renal angiomyolipoma: optimal treatment based on size and symptoms. Dickinson M; Ruckle H; Beaghler M; Hadley HR Clin Nephrol; 1998 May; 49(5):281-6. PubMed ID: 9617489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prevalence and predictors of benign lesions in renal masses smaller than 7 cm presumed to be renal cell carcinoma. Akdogan B; Gudeloglu A; Inci K; Gunay LM; Koni A; Ozen H Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2012 Jun; 10(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 22401753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Renal lesion growth in children with tuberous sclerosis complex. Ewalt DH; Sheffield E; Sparagana SP; Delgado MR; Roach ES J Urol; 1998 Jul; 160(1):141-5. PubMed ID: 9628635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The fate of small renal masses, less then 1 cm size: outcome study. Lang EK; Hanano A; Rudman E; Thomas R; Myers L; Nguyen Q; Macchia RJ Int Braz J Urol; 2012; 38(1):40-8; discussion 48. PubMed ID: 22397785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Significance of incidental thyroid lesions detected on CT: correlation among CT, sonography, and pathology. Shetty SK; Maher MM; Hahn PF; Halpern EF; Aquino SL AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Nov; 187(5):1349-56. PubMed ID: 17056928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Thyroid lesions visualized on CT: sonographic and pathologic correlation. Lee C; Chalmers B; Treister D; Adhya S; Godwin B; Ji L; Groshen S; Grant E Acad Radiol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):203-9. PubMed ID: 25262956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incidental finding of renal masses at unenhanced CT: prevalence and analysis of features for guiding management. O'Connor SD; Pickhardt PJ; Kim DH; Oliva MR; Silverman SG AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jul; 197(1):139-45. PubMed ID: 21701022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Small echogenic renal masses: how often is computed tomography used to confirm the sonographic suspicion of angiomyolipoma? Ikeda AK; Korobkin M; Platt JF; Cohan RH; Ellis JH Urology; 1995 Sep; 46(3):311-5. PubMed ID: 7660504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]