These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26740525)

  • 1. PINCAGE: probabilistic integration of cancer genomics data for perturbed gene identification and sample classification.
    Świtnicki MP; Juul M; Madsen T; Sørensen KD; Pedersen JS
    Bioinformatics; 2016 May; 32(9):1353-65. PubMed ID: 26740525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ProbFold: a probabilistic method for integration of probing data in RNA secondary structure prediction.
    Sahoo S; Świtnicki MP; Pedersen JS
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Sep; 32(17):2626-35. PubMed ID: 27153612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integration of somatic mutation, expression and functional data reveals potential driver genes predictive of breast cancer survival.
    Suo C; Hrydziuszko O; Lee D; Pramana S; Saputra D; Joshi H; Calza S; Pawitan Y
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Aug; 31(16):2607-13. PubMed ID: 25810432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploring breast carcinogenesis through integrative genomics and epigenomics analyses.
    Minning C; Mokhtar NM; Abdullah N; Muhammad R; Emran NA; Ali SA; Harun R; Jamal R
    Int J Oncol; 2014 Nov; 45(5):1959-68. PubMed ID: 25175708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MethCNA: a database for integrating genomic and epigenomic data in human cancer.
    Deng G; Yang J; Zhang Q; Xiao ZX; Cai H
    BMC Genomics; 2018 Feb; 19(1):138. PubMed ID: 29433427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cancer driver gene discovery through an integrative genomics approach in a non-parametric Bayesian framework.
    Yang H; Wei Q; Zhong X; Yang H; Li B
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Feb; 33(4):483-490. PubMed ID: 27797769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using epigenomics data to predict gene expression in lung cancer.
    Li J; Ching T; Huang S; Garmire LX
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015; 16 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S10. PubMed ID: 25861082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. NCC-AUC: an AUC optimization method to identify multi-biomarker panel for cancer prognosis from genomic and clinical data.
    Zou M; Liu Z; Zhang XS; Wang Y
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Oct; 31(20):3330-8. PubMed ID: 26092859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting censored survival data based on the interactions between meta-dimensional omics data in breast cancer.
    Kim D; Li R; Dudek SM; Ritchie MD
    J Biomed Inform; 2015 Aug; 56():220-8. PubMed ID: 26048077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inference of patient-specific pathway activities from multi-dimensional cancer genomics data using PARADIGM.
    Vaske CJ; Benz SC; Sanborn JZ; Earl D; Szeto C; Zhu J; Haussler D; Stuart JM
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Jun; 26(12):i237-45. PubMed ID: 20529912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification of diagnostic markers in colorectal cancer via integrative epigenomics and genomics data.
    Kok-Sin T; Mokhtar NM; Ali Hassan NZ; Sagap I; Mohamed Rose I; Harun R; Jamal R
    Oncol Rep; 2015 Jul; 34(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 25997610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MetaKTSP: a meta-analytic top scoring pair method for robust cross-study validation of omics prediction analysis.
    Kim S; Lin CW; Tseng GC
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Jul; 32(13):1966-73. PubMed ID: 27153719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Integrating multiple omics data for the discovery of potential Beclin-1 interactions in breast cancer.
    Chen Y; Wang X; Wang G; Li Z; Wang J; Huang L; Qin Z; Yuan X; Cheng Z; Zhang S; Yin Y; He J
    Mol Biosyst; 2017 May; 13(5):991-999. PubMed ID: 28401970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gene-set analysis is severely biased when applied to genome-wide methylation data.
    Geeleher P; Hartnett L; Egan LJ; Golden A; Raja Ali RA; Seoighe C
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Aug; 29(15):1851-7. PubMed ID: 23732277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. iBAG: integrative Bayesian analysis of high-dimensional multiplatform genomics data.
    Wang W; Baladandayuthapani V; Morris JS; Broom BM; Manyam G; Do KA
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Jan; 29(2):149-59. PubMed ID: 23142963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. PSSV: a novel pattern-based probabilistic approach for somatic structural variation identification.
    Chen X; Shi X; Hilakivi-Clarke L; Shajahan-Haq AN; Clarke R; Xuan J
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 33(2):177-183. PubMed ID: 27659451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. DM-BLD: differential methylation detection using a hierarchical Bayesian model exploiting local dependency.
    Wang X; Gu J; Hilakivi-Clarke L; Clarke R; Xuan J
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 33(2):161-168. PubMed ID: 27616707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Bayesian two-way latent structure model for genomic data integration reveals few pan-genomic cluster subtypes in a breast cancer cohort.
    Swanson DM; Lien T; Bergholtz H; Sørlie T; Frigessi A
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 35(23):4886-4897. PubMed ID: 31077301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tightly integrated genomic and epigenomic data mining using tensor decomposition.
    Fang J
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Jan; 35(1):112-118. PubMed ID: 29939222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Expression and methylation patterns partition luminal-A breast tumors into distinct prognostic subgroups.
    Netanely D; Avraham A; Ben-Baruch A; Evron E; Shamir R
    Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Jul; 18(1):74. PubMed ID: 27386846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.