These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2674150)
21. Ceramic implant abutments for short-span FPDs: a prospective 5-year multicenter study. Andersson B; Glauser R; Maglione M; Taylor A Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):640-6. PubMed ID: 14714845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparative implant research in dogs: prosthodontic protocol using two-stage ceramic endosseous dental implants. Parr GR; Gardner LK; Steflik DE; Sisk AL; Hanes PJ Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1992; 7(4):508-12. PubMed ID: 1299647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The clinical assessment of a ceramic-coated transmucosal dental implant collar. Barclay CW; Last KS; Williams R Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(5):466-72. PubMed ID: 9108748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Tissues at the surface of the new composite material titanium/glass-ceramic for replacement of bone and teeth. Müller-Mai C; Schmitz HJ; Strunz V; Fuhrmann G; Fritz T; Gross UM J Biomed Mater Res; 1989 Oct; 23(10):1149-68. PubMed ID: 2808461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Bone-implant interface and remaining tissues on the implant surface after push-out test: an SEM observation. Li J Biomed Mater Eng; 1997; 7(6):379-85. PubMed ID: 9622105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Does titanium surface treatment influence the bone-implant interface? SEM and histomorphometry in a 6-month sheep study. Huré G; Donath K; Lesourd M; Chappard D; Baslé MF Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(4):506-11. PubMed ID: 8803346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Histomorphometric analysis of the repair of a segmental diaphyseal defect with ceramic and titanium fibermetal implants: effects of bone marrow. Wolff D; Goldberg VM; Stevenson S J Orthop Res; 1994 May; 12(3):439-46. PubMed ID: 8207598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of the peri-implant membrane induced around ceramic dental implants in dogs: a transmission electron microscopic study. Yamada S; Sekiya S; Yamanouchi K; Kitamura H; Ohshima M; Sato T Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1989 Nov; 30(4):187-93. PubMed ID: 2640918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive) and conventional SLA titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs. Schwarz F; Herten M; Sager M; Wieland M; Dard M; Becker J J Clin Periodontol; 2007 Jan; 34(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 17137467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Histologic and histomorphometric analysis of three types of dental implants following 18 months of occlusal loading: a preliminary study in baboons. Watzak G; Zechner W; Ulm C; Tangl S; Tepper G; Watzek G Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):408-16. PubMed ID: 16117764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The mucosal barrier at implant abutments of different materials. Welander M; Abrahamsson I; Berglundh T Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jul; 19(7):635-41. PubMed ID: 18492075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Scanning electron microscopic studies of the oral tissue responses to dental implants. Steflik DE; McKinney RV; Sisk AL; Parr GR; Koth DL Scanning Microsc; 1990 Dec; 4(4):1021-37; discussion 1037-8. PubMed ID: 2094003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Osteoblast activity at the dental implant-bone interface: transmission electron microscopic and high voltage electron microscopic observations. Steflik DE; Parr GR; Sisk AL; Lake FT; Hanes PJ; Berkery DJ; Brewer P J Periodontol; 1994 May; 65(5):404-13. PubMed ID: 8046555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The biomaterial-tissue interface: a morphological study utilizing conventional and alternative ultrastructural modalities. Steflik DE; McKinney RV; Koth DL; Singh BB Scan Electron Microsc; 1984; (Pt 2):547-55. PubMed ID: 6484493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [A biomechanical investigation of Ha-coated ceramic implant]. Liu Y; Chen BS; Tao CZ Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 1994 Dec; 3(4):212-5. PubMed ID: 15160128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of combinations of titanium, zirconia, and alumina implants with 2 bone fillers in the dog. Dubruille JH; Viguier E; Le Naour G; Dubruille MT; Auriol M; Le Charpentier Y Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(2):271-7. PubMed ID: 10212545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Early loading of non-submerged titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Bornstein MM; Schmid B; Belser UC; Lussi A; Buser D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Dec; 16(6):631-8. PubMed ID: 16307568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effect of surface macrotexture and hydroxylapatite coating on the mechanical strengths and histologic profiles of titanium implant materials. Thomas KA; Kay JF; Cook SD; Jarcho M J Biomed Mater Res; 1987 Dec; 21(12):1395-414. PubMed ID: 3429474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of interface characterization and adhesion of glass ceramics to commercially pure titanium and gold alloy after thermal- and mechanical-loading. Vásquez VZ; Ozcan M; Kimpara ET Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 18718654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]