These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26741800)

  • 1. The Rapid Capture of Attention by Rewarded Objects.
    Donohue SE; Hopf JM; Bartsch MV; Schoenfeld MA; Heinze HJ; Woldorff MG
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Apr; 28(4):529-41. PubMed ID: 26741800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Normal aging delays and compromises early multifocal visual attention during object tracking.
    Störmer VS; Li SC; Heekeren HR; Lindenberger U
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Feb; 25(2):188-202. PubMed ID: 23016765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rewarded visual items capture attention only in heterogeneous contexts.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Brandhofer R; Schubö A
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Jul; 53(7):1063-73. PubMed ID: 26997364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rapid top-down control over template-guided attention shifts to multiple objects.
    Grubert A; Fahrenfort J; Olivers CNL; Eimer M
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 146():843-858. PubMed ID: 27554532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selective attention to specific features within objects: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Nobre AC; Rao A; Chelazzi L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):539-61. PubMed ID: 16768359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual object representations can be formed outside the focus of voluntary attention: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Müller D; Winkler I; Roeber U; Schaffer S; Czigler I; Schröger E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1179-88. PubMed ID: 19445610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reward-associated features capture attention in the absence of awareness: Evidence from object-substitution masking.
    Harris JA; Donohue SE; Schoenfeld MA; Hopf JM; Heinze HJ; Woldorff MG
    Neuroimage; 2016 Aug; 137():116-123. PubMed ID: 27153978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Speed of Serial Attention Shifts in Visual Search: Evidence from the N2pc Component.
    Grubert A; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Feb; 28(2):319-32. PubMed ID: 26488588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contingent capture can occur at specific feature values: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Jiao J; Zhao G; Wang Q; Zhang K; Li H; Sun HJ; Liu Q
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Feb; 92(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 23069637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ERP signs of categorical and supra-categorical processing of visual information.
    Zani A; Marsili G; Senerchia A; Orlandi A; Citron FM; Rizzi E; Proverbio AM
    Biol Psychol; 2015 Jan; 104():90-107. PubMed ID: 25447739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural generators of sustained activity differ for stimulus-encoding and delay maintenance.
    Malecki U; Stallforth S; Heipertz D; Lavie N; Duzel E
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Sep; 30(5):924-33. PubMed ID: 19712102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transcranial random-noise stimulation of visual cortex potentiates value-driven attentional capture.
    van Koningsbruggen MG; Ficarella SC; Battelli L; Hickey C
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 11(9):1481-8. PubMed ID: 27107297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Occipital-parietal interactions during shifts of exogenous visuospatial attention: trial-dependent changes of effective connectivity.
    Indovina I; Macaluso E
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Dec; 22(10):1477-86. PubMed ID: 15707797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Top-down directed attention to stimulus features and attentional allocation to bottom-up deviations.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    J Vis; 2008 Nov; 8(15):4.1-8. PubMed ID: 19146288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Value-driven attentional capture is modulated by the contents of working memory: An EEG study.
    Hinault T; Blacker KJ; Gormley M; Anderson BA; Courtney SM
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2019 Apr; 19(2):253-267. PubMed ID: 30460482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of category learning on attentional modulation of visual cortex.
    Folstein JR; Fuller K; Howard D; DePatie T
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Sep; 104():18-30. PubMed ID: 28754490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physical Salience and Value-Driven Salience Operate through Different Neural Mechanisms to Enhance Attentional Selection.
    Bachman MD; Wang L; Gamble ML; Woldorff MG
    J Neurosci; 2020 Jul; 40(28):5455-5464. PubMed ID: 32471878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrophysiological evidence of the capture of visual attention.
    Hickey C; McDonald JJ; Theeuwes J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):604-13. PubMed ID: 16768363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Object-based selection of irrelevant features is not confined to the attended object.
    Boehler CN; Schoenfeld MA; Heinze HJ; Hopf JM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 23(9):2231-9. PubMed ID: 20666592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Distinct roles of the intraparietal sulcus and temporoparietal junction in attentional capture from distractor features: An individual differences approach.
    Painter DR; Dux PE; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jul; 74():50-62. PubMed ID: 25724234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.