These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26742103)
1. Influences of State and Trait Affect on Behavior, Feedback-Related Negativity, and P3b in the Ultimatum Game. Riepl K; Mussel P; Osinsky R; Hewig J PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146358. PubMed ID: 26742103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rejection in Bargaining Situations: An Event-Related Potential Study in Adolescents and Adults. Zanolie K; de Cremer D; Güroğlu B; Crone EA PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139953. PubMed ID: 26445134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Serum omega-3 fatty acids are associated with ultimatum bargaining behavior. Emanuele E; Brondino N; Re S; Bertona M; Geroldi D Physiol Behav; 2009 Jan; 96(1):180-3. PubMed ID: 18940191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Altered behavioral and electrophysiological responses to social fairness in manic and euthymic patients with bipolar disorder. Ryu V; Ha RY; Cho HS Brain Behav; 2021 Aug; 11(8):e2289. PubMed ID: 34291610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationship between platelet serotonin content and rejections of unfair offers in the ultimatum game. Emanuele E; Brondino N; Bertona M; Re S; Geroldi D Neurosci Lett; 2008 May; 437(2):158-61. PubMed ID: 18448251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perceived relative social status and cognitive load influence acceptance of unfair offers in the Ultimatum Game. Harris A; Young A; Hughson L; Green D; Doan SN; Hughson E; Reed CL PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227717. PubMed ID: 31917806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Social comparisons differentially affect fair and unfair processing in ultimatum bargaining. Li Q; Dai W; Zheng Y; Wang C; Yang Z; Ren Q; Hu K; Liu X Neuropsychologia; 2022 Sep; 174():108318. PubMed ID: 35830915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The neural correlate of mid-value offers in ultimatum game. Zhong X; Wang R; Huang S; Chen J; Chen H; Qu C PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0220622. PubMed ID: 31430295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Social preferences trump emotions in human responses to unfair offers. Buskens V; Kovacic I; Rutterkamp E; van de Rijt A; Terburg D Sci Rep; 2023 Jun; 13(1):9602. PubMed ID: 37311882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Salivary alpha-amylase levels and rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game. Takagishi H; Fujii T; Kameshima S; Koizumi M; Takahashi T Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2009; 30(5):643-6. PubMed ID: 20035253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Taking it easy when playing ultimatum game with a Down syndrome proposer: Effects on behavior and medial frontal negativity. Rêgo GG; Campanhã C; do Egito JHT; Boggio PS Soc Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 12(5):530-540. PubMed ID: 27237685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Shall I Show My Emotions? The Effects of Facial Expressions in the Ultimatum Game. Ferracci S; Giuliani F; Brancucci A; Pietroni D Behav Sci (Basel); 2021 Dec; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 35049619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Beauty matters: social preferences in a three-person ultimatum game. Ma Q; Hu Y PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0125806. PubMed ID: 25951138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Disgust selectively modulates reciprocal fairness in economic interactions. Moretti L; di Pellegrino G Emotion; 2010 Apr; 10(2):169-80. PubMed ID: 20364893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Medial frontal negativity reflects advantageous inequality aversion of proposers in the ultimatum game: An ERP study. Wang G; Li J; Li Z; Wei M; Li S Brain Res; 2016 May; 1639():38-46. PubMed ID: 26930614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Empathy leads to fairness. Page KM; Nowak MA Bull Math Biol; 2002 Nov; 64(6):1101-16. PubMed ID: 12508533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. "I'm worth more than that": trait positivity predicts increased rejection of unfair financial offers. Dunn BD; Makarova D; Evans D; Clark L PLoS One; 2010 Dec; 5(12):e15095. PubMed ID: 21170341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digit ratio (2D:4D) moderates the impact of sexual cues on men's decisions in ultimatum games. Van den Bergh B; Dewitte S Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Aug; 273(1597):2091-5. PubMed ID: 16846918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pro-inflammatory cytokine predicts reduced rejection of unfair financial offers. Ohira H; Osumi T; Matsunaga M; Yamakawa K Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2013; 34(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 23524623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preference and strategy in proposer's prosocial giving in the ultimatum game. Inaba M; Inoue Y; Akutsu S; Takahashi N; Yamagishi T PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193877. PubMed ID: 29505587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]