These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26743111)

  • 1. Factors influencing difficulty of the thoracic procedure in minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Okamura A; Watanabe M; Mine S; Nishida K; Imamura Y; Kurogochi T; Kitagawa Y; Sano T
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Oct; 30(10):4279-85. PubMed ID: 26743111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anatomical factor associated with thoracic procedural difficulty in robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Kuriyama K; Okamura A; Kanamori J; Imamura Y; Tamura M; Takahashi N; Terayama M; Kanie Y; Maruyama S; Watanabe M
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2024 Jun; 409(1):190. PubMed ID: 38896339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Utility of thoracic cage width in assessing surgical difficulty of minimally invasive esophagectomy in left lateral decubitus position.
    Takeno S; Tanoue Y; Hamada R; Kawano F; Tashiro K; Wada T; Ikenoue M; Nanashima A; Nakamura K
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3479-3486. PubMed ID: 31576442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mediastinal Adiposity Influences the Technical Difficulty of Thoracic Procedure in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.
    Okamura A; Watanabe M; Kurogochi T; Imamura Y; Nishida K; Mine S
    World J Surg; 2016 Oct; 40(10):2398-404. PubMed ID: 27194559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for treatment of esophageal carcinoma.
    Chiu PW; Teoh AY; Wong VW; Yip HC; Chan SM; Wong SK; Ng EK
    J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):193-199. PubMed ID: 27783358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of thoracic cage width on surgery time and postoperative outcome in minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Mann C; Jezycki T; Berlth F; Hadzijusufovic E; Uzun E; Mähringer-Kunz A; Lang H; Klöckner R; Grimminger PP
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Nov; 37(11):8301-8308. PubMed ID: 37679581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Comparison of Early Surgical Outcomes From The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database.
    Sihag S; Kosinski AS; Gaissert HA; Wright CD; Schipper PH
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Apr; 101(4):1281-8; discussion 1288-9. PubMed ID: 26704412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Short-term Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.
    Nomoto D; Yoshida N; Akiyama T; Kiyozumi Y; Eto K; Hiyoshi Y; Nagai Y; Iwatsuki M; Iwagami S; Baba Y; Miyamoto Y; Baba H
    Anticancer Res; 2019 Jan; 39(1):471-475. PubMed ID: 30591497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Esophageal Position Affects Short-Term Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.
    Uchihara T; Yoshida N; Baba Y; Nakashima Y; Kimura Y; Saeki H; Takeno S; Sadanaga N; Ikebe M; Morita M; Toh Y; Nanashima A; Maehara Y; Baba H
    World J Surg; 2020 Mar; 44(3):831-837. PubMed ID: 31701157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally invasive esophagectomy provides significant survival advantage compared with open or hybrid esophagectomy for patients with cancers of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction.
    Palazzo F; Rosato EL; Chaudhary A; Evans NR; Sendecki JA; Keith S; Chojnacki KA; Yeo CJ; Berger AC
    J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Apr; 220(4):672-9. PubMed ID: 25667145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using a Nationwide Database in Japan.
    Takeuchi H; Miyata H; Ozawa S; Udagawa H; Osugi H; Matsubara H; Konno H; Seto Y; Kitagawa Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):1821-1827. PubMed ID: 28224366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early experience and lessons learned in a new minimally invasive esophagectomy program.
    Mungo B; Lidor AO; Stem M; Molena D
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1692-8. PubMed ID: 26123339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy is equivalent to thoracoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Weksler B; Sharma P; Moudgill N; Chojnacki KA; Rosato EL
    Dis Esophagus; 2012 Jul; 25(5):403-9. PubMed ID: 21899652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recent advances in minimally invasive esophagectomy for squamous esophageal cancer.
    Yip HC; Shirakawa Y; Cheng CY; Huang CL; Chiu PWY
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2020 Dec; 1482(1):113-120. PubMed ID: 32783237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predictive factors of difficulty of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the left decubitus position.
    Fujiwara Y; Lee S; Gyobu K; Inazu D; Naka R; Nishiyama M; Ohira M; Osugi H
    Esophagus; 2019 Jul; 16(3):316-323. PubMed ID: 31041586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally invasive esophagectomy performed with the patient in a prone position: a systematic review.
    Koyanagi K; Ozawa S; Tachimori Y
    Surg Today; 2016 Mar; 46(3):275-84. PubMed ID: 25860592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer: review of the literature and institutional experience.
    Yamamoto M; Weber JM; Karl RC; Meredith KL
    Cancer Control; 2013 Apr; 20(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 23571703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experience with minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Collins G; Johnson E; Kroshus T; Ganz R; Batts K; Seng J; Nwaneri O; Dunn D
    Surg Endosc; 2006 Feb; 20(2):298-301. PubMed ID: 16362469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcomes With Open and Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy After Neoadjuvant Therapy.
    Tapias LF; Mathisen DJ; Wright CD; Wain JC; Gaissert HA; Muniappan A; Lanuti M; Donahue DM; Morse CR
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 101(3):1097-103. PubMed ID: 26652140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Thoracic cavity-to-cage ratio is a predictor of technical difficulties in minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Abe T; Oshikiri T; Goto H; Kato T; Horikawa M; Sawada R; Harada H; Urakawa N; Hasegawa H; Kanaji S; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Kakeji Y
    Surgery; 2022 Jul; 172(1):145-149. PubMed ID: 35314070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.